急性冠脉综合征全因死亡率的新指标:CALLY指数。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biomarkers in medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1080/17520363.2025.2483159
Barış Güven, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Neziha Aybüke Geylan, Barkın Kültürsay, Ayça Dönmez, Zübeyir Bulat, Ömer Burak Gül, Melike Kaya, Veysel Oktay
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征全因死亡率的新指标:CALLY指数。","authors":"Barış Güven, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Neziha Aybüke Geylan, Barkın Kültürsay, Ayça Dönmez, Zübeyir Bulat, Ömer Burak Gül, Melike Kaya, Veysel Oktay","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2025.2483159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index for predicting all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for revascularization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>505 patients who presented with ACS and underwent pPCI were retrospectively included in this single center study. CALLY index and other five prognostic scores were calculated. The median follow-up was 40 months. All-cause mortality was defined as the primary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients was 59 years, 23.4% were female. The CALLY index was categorized into low (<0.7) and high (≥0.7). Age (<i>p</i> = 0.038), concomitant atrial fibrillation (<i>p</i> = 0.023), previous CABG (<i>p</i> = 0.001), ACE-I/ARB/ARNI use (<i>p</i> = 0.015), diuretic use (<i>p</i> = 0.021), and a low-CALLY index (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of all-cause mortality in multivariate cox regression analysis. When compared to other prognostic scores according to AUC in ROC analysis, the CALLY index demonstrated the best ability to predict all-cause mortality. Additionally, patients with a high-CALLY index exhibited significantly better survival outcomes compared to those with a low-CALLY index (log-rank:<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CALLY index can be utilized as a novel prognostic score for predicting all-cause mortality in ACS patients who have undergone pPCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"287-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel indicator of all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome: the CALLY index.\",\"authors\":\"Barış Güven, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Neziha Aybüke Geylan, Barkın Kültürsay, Ayça Dönmez, Zübeyir Bulat, Ömer Burak Gül, Melike Kaya, Veysel Oktay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17520363.2025.2483159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index for predicting all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for revascularization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>505 patients who presented with ACS and underwent pPCI were retrospectively included in this single center study. CALLY index and other five prognostic scores were calculated. The median follow-up was 40 months. All-cause mortality was defined as the primary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients was 59 years, 23.4% were female. The CALLY index was categorized into low (<0.7) and high (≥0.7). Age (<i>p</i> = 0.038), concomitant atrial fibrillation (<i>p</i> = 0.023), previous CABG (<i>p</i> = 0.001), ACE-I/ARB/ARNI use (<i>p</i> = 0.015), diuretic use (<i>p</i> = 0.021), and a low-CALLY index (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of all-cause mortality in multivariate cox regression analysis. When compared to other prognostic scores according to AUC in ROC analysis, the CALLY index demonstrated the best ability to predict all-cause mortality. Additionally, patients with a high-CALLY index exhibited significantly better survival outcomes compared to those with a low-CALLY index (log-rank:<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CALLY index can be utilized as a novel prognostic score for predicting all-cause mortality in ACS patients who have undergone pPCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"287-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980495/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2483159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2483159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定c反应蛋白-白蛋白淋巴细胞(CALLY)指数在预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的全因死亡率中的预后意义。材料和方法:本单中心研究回顾性纳入505例ACS患者并行pPCI。计算CALLY指数及其他5项预后评分。中位随访时间为40个月。全因死亡率被定义为主要终点。结果:患者中位年龄59岁,女性占23.4%。CALLY指数分为低(p = 0.038)、合并房颤(p = 0.023)、既往CABG (p = 0.001)、ACE-I/ARB/ARNI使用(p = 0.015)、利尿剂使用(p = 0.021)和低CALLY指数(p p)。结论:CALLY指数可作为预测接受pPCI的ACS患者全因死亡率的一种新的预后评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel indicator of all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome: the CALLY index.

Aims: This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index for predicting all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for revascularization.

Materials and methods: 505 patients who presented with ACS and underwent pPCI were retrospectively included in this single center study. CALLY index and other five prognostic scores were calculated. The median follow-up was 40 months. All-cause mortality was defined as the primary endpoint.

Results: The median age of the patients was 59 years, 23.4% were female. The CALLY index was categorized into low (<0.7) and high (≥0.7). Age (p = 0.038), concomitant atrial fibrillation (p = 0.023), previous CABG (p = 0.001), ACE-I/ARB/ARNI use (p = 0.015), diuretic use (p = 0.021), and a low-CALLY index (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of all-cause mortality in multivariate cox regression analysis. When compared to other prognostic scores according to AUC in ROC analysis, the CALLY index demonstrated the best ability to predict all-cause mortality. Additionally, patients with a high-CALLY index exhibited significantly better survival outcomes compared to those with a low-CALLY index (log-rank:p < 0.001).

Conclusions: CALLY index can be utilized as a novel prognostic score for predicting all-cause mortality in ACS patients who have undergone pPCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in medicine
Biomarkers in medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory. Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice. As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications. Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest. Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信