内镜下近端移位胰管支架的移除:一个病例系列和文献回顾。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0954
Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana
{"title":"内镜下近端移位胰管支架的移除:一个病例系列和文献回顾。","authors":"Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents <i>in situ</i>. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2025.0954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents <i>in situ</i>. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"230-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰腺支架近端移位是一个不常见但重要的问题,它会带来疼痛和胰腺炎的风险。对于内窥镜医生来说,这通常是一个具有挑战性的情况,10%的病例需要手术切除。方法:对2010年1月至2019年12月在印度北部一家三级医疗中心进行的支架移除手术进行了10年的回顾性研究。结果:本组共16例(平均年龄39.52岁,男性13例[81.25%])行近端移位胰内支架(pmps)。13例(81.25%)患者胰管扩张,3例(18.75%)患者胰管未扩张。在大多数患者中,pmps位于膝(50%),62%长度为10 cm。3例(18.75%)患者支架碎片化,其余13例(81.25%)患者支架原位完整。12例(75%)患者可以完全取出PPMS和支架碎片,大多数(50%)患者使用抓钳。在支架碎片化和定位困难的患者中(n=3),胰镜辅助技术可将支架或碎片取出。3例患者pmps无法检索:所有这些失败都发生在我们单位没有SpyGlass胰镜的研究期间。2例患者(12.5%)报告术后疼痛对静脉镇痛药有反应。结论:内镜下取下近端移位支架,结合技术和附件是安全有效的。胰镜检查提高了成功率。支架移除很少需要手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.

Background: Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.

Method: A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.

Results: Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents in situ. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.

Conclusions: Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信