{"title":"内镜下近端移位胰管支架的移除:一个病例系列和文献回顾。","authors":"Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents <i>in situ</i>. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2025.0954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents <i>in situ</i>. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"230-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.
Background: Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.
Method: A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.
Results: Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents in situ. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.
Conclusions: Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.