IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0955
Shivanand Bomman, Andrew Canakis, Muaaz Masood, Jagpal S Klair, Rodrigo Alvarez, Arunkumar Muthusamy, Shruti Chandra, Avin Aggarwal, Hemanth Gavini, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
{"title":"Early versus late drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shivanand Bomman, Andrew Canakis, Muaaz Masood, Jagpal S Klair, Rodrigo Alvarez, Arunkumar Muthusamy, Shruti Chandra, Avin Aggarwal, Hemanth Gavini, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Necrotizing pancreatitis can be complicated by necrotic fluid collections (NFCs). International guidelines recommend waiting 4 weeks for the collection to mature before interventional management. With the advances in endoscopic drainage, the need to delay drainage by 4 weeks is unclear. We aimed to compare early drainage (ED: <4 weeks) vs. late drainage (LD: ≥4 weeks) of NFCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches through multiple databases were performed to identify studies that investigated outcomes of ED vs. LD of NFCs. Our primary outcome was the complication rate among these groups. The secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring subsequent necrosectomies, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 studies with 855 patients (320 ED and 535 LD). The complication rates (rate ratio 1.060, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.42; P=0.69; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=51.61) and the number of patients requiring subsequent necrosectomies (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% CI 0.86-5.35; P=0.099; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=79.81) were similar in both groups. Mortality was slightly higher in the ED group (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.05-3.59; P=0.033; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that ED can be performed if needed in carefully selected patients without an increase in complications or subsequent necrosectomies. However, mortality was slightly higher compared to LD. A multidisciplinary team approach is necessary for considering ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坏死性胰腺炎可并发坏死性积液(NFC)。国际指南建议在介入治疗前等待 4 周让积液成熟。随着内镜引流技术的发展,是否需要延迟 4 周引流尚不明确。我们旨在比较早期引流(ED:方法:我们通过多个数据库进行了文献检索,以确定对 NFCs ED 与 LD 结果进行调查的研究。我们的主要结果是这些组别的并发症发生率。次要结果包括需要进行后续坏死切除术的患者人数和死亡率:我们确定了 9 项研究,共 855 例患者(320 例 ED 和 535 例 LD)。两组的并发症发生率(比率比 1.060,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.79-1.42;P=0.69;I 2=51.61)和需要后续坏死组织切除术的患者人数(几率比 [OR]:2.15,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.86-5.35;P=0.099;I 2=79.81)相似。ED组死亡率略高(OR 1.94,95%CI 1.05-3.59;P=0.033;I 2=0):我们的研究表明,经过仔细挑选的患者在必要时可以进行 ED,而不会增加并发症或后续坏死切除术。然而,与 LD 相比,死亡率略高。在考虑 ED 时,有必要采用多学科团队方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early versus late drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Necrotizing pancreatitis can be complicated by necrotic fluid collections (NFCs). International guidelines recommend waiting 4 weeks for the collection to mature before interventional management. With the advances in endoscopic drainage, the need to delay drainage by 4 weeks is unclear. We aimed to compare early drainage (ED: <4 weeks) vs. late drainage (LD: ≥4 weeks) of NFCs.

Methods: Literature searches through multiple databases were performed to identify studies that investigated outcomes of ED vs. LD of NFCs. Our primary outcome was the complication rate among these groups. The secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring subsequent necrosectomies, and mortality.

Results: We identified 9 studies with 855 patients (320 ED and 535 LD). The complication rates (rate ratio 1.060, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.42; P=0.69; I 2=51.61) and the number of patients requiring subsequent necrosectomies (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% CI 0.86-5.35; P=0.099; I 2=79.81) were similar in both groups. Mortality was slightly higher in the ED group (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.05-3.59; P=0.033; I 2=0).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that ED can be performed if needed in carefully selected patients without an increase in complications or subsequent necrosectomies. However, mortality was slightly higher compared to LD. A multidisciplinary team approach is necessary for considering ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信