流感样疾病的护理点核酸检测:德国初级保健高危患者的成本-后果分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Johannes Pöhlmann, Anika Joecker, Tanja Wittki, Tray Brown, Richard F. Pollock, Jordan Chase
{"title":"流感样疾病的护理点核酸检测:德国初级保健高危患者的成本-后果分析","authors":"Johannes Pöhlmann,&nbsp;Anika Joecker,&nbsp;Tanja Wittki,&nbsp;Tray Brown,&nbsp;Richard F. Pollock,&nbsp;Jordan Chase","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Influenza A/B virus, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause similar symptoms, often referred to as influenza-like illness, but require different treatments which must be administered within a short timeframe after symptom onset. This necessitates rapid detection and accurate differentiation by primary care providers, ideally at point of care (POC). POC nucleic acid tests such as the multiplex, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Xpert<sup>®</sup> Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV <i>plus</i> (Xpert Xpress) offer a faster, more accurate alternative compared to antigen testing, clinical judgement alone, or send-out PCR. This cost–consequence analysis evaluated Xpert Xpress versus conventional testing methods, from a German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 1-year decision tree was developed to compare Xpert Xpress with antigen testing, send-out PCR, and empiric diagnosis, for influenza A/B virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. The model accounted for diagnostic accuracy and projected the share of patients receiving results within guideline-recommended treatment windows. Data on test accuracy, treatment effects, and costs were sourced from literature and German databases. The main outcome was total cost to the SHI for the 2023/24 respiratory illness season.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Xpert Xpress was associated with the highest number of net correct treatment courses (<i>n</i> = 443,600) versus empiric diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 239,250), antigen testing (<i>n</i> = 347,218), and send-out PCR (<i>n</i> = 280,527). Acquisition costs were highest for Xpert Xpress (EUR 38.4 million versus EUR 27.4 million for antigen testing and EUR 33.5 million for send-out PCR) but were offset by reduced hospitalization and intensive care costs. Overall, Xpert Xpress was associated with cost savings of EUR 1.97 million versus empiric diagnosis, EUR 10.1 million versus antigen testing, and EUR 20.8 million versus send-out PCR.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using Xpert Xpress at POC combined fast turnaround with high diagnostic accuracy, thereby increasing correct treatment courses while reducing total costs for influenza, COVID-19, and RSV, offering substantial savings to the German SHI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 5","pages":"2385 - 2402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point of Care Nucleic Acid Testing for Influenza-Like Illness: A Cost–Consequence Analysis for High-Risk Patients in Primary Care in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Pöhlmann,&nbsp;Anika Joecker,&nbsp;Tanja Wittki,&nbsp;Tray Brown,&nbsp;Richard F. Pollock,&nbsp;Jordan Chase\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Influenza A/B virus, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause similar symptoms, often referred to as influenza-like illness, but require different treatments which must be administered within a short timeframe after symptom onset. This necessitates rapid detection and accurate differentiation by primary care providers, ideally at point of care (POC). POC nucleic acid tests such as the multiplex, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Xpert<sup>®</sup> Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV <i>plus</i> (Xpert Xpress) offer a faster, more accurate alternative compared to antigen testing, clinical judgement alone, or send-out PCR. This cost–consequence analysis evaluated Xpert Xpress versus conventional testing methods, from a German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 1-year decision tree was developed to compare Xpert Xpress with antigen testing, send-out PCR, and empiric diagnosis, for influenza A/B virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. The model accounted for diagnostic accuracy and projected the share of patients receiving results within guideline-recommended treatment windows. Data on test accuracy, treatment effects, and costs were sourced from literature and German databases. The main outcome was total cost to the SHI for the 2023/24 respiratory illness season.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Xpert Xpress was associated with the highest number of net correct treatment courses (<i>n</i> = 443,600) versus empiric diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 239,250), antigen testing (<i>n</i> = 347,218), and send-out PCR (<i>n</i> = 280,527). Acquisition costs were highest for Xpert Xpress (EUR 38.4 million versus EUR 27.4 million for antigen testing and EUR 33.5 million for send-out PCR) but were offset by reduced hospitalization and intensive care costs. Overall, Xpert Xpress was associated with cost savings of EUR 1.97 million versus empiric diagnosis, EUR 10.1 million versus antigen testing, and EUR 20.8 million versus send-out PCR.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using Xpert Xpress at POC combined fast turnaround with high diagnostic accuracy, thereby increasing correct treatment courses while reducing total costs for influenza, COVID-19, and RSV, offering substantial savings to the German SHI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"2385 - 2402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03156-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流感A/B病毒、严重急性呼吸道冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)引起类似的症状,通常被称为流感样疾病,但需要不同的治疗方法,必须在症状出现后的短时间内给予治疗。这需要初级保健提供者快速发现和准确区分,理想情况下是在护理点(POC)。POC核酸检测,如多重实时聚合酶链反应(PCR) Xpert®Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus (Xpert Xpress),与抗原检测、单独临床判断或发送式PCR相比,提供了更快、更准确的替代方案。本成本-后果分析从德国法定健康保险(SHI)的角度对Xpert Xpress与传统测试方法进行了评估。方法:建立1年决策树,将Xpert Xpress与流感A/B病毒、SARS-CoV-2和RSV的抗原检测、外送PCR和经验诊断进行比较。该模型考虑了诊断的准确性,并预测了在指南推荐的治疗窗口内接受结果的患者比例。有关检测准确性、治疗效果和费用的数据来源于文献和德国数据库。主要结果为2023/24呼吸道疾病季节的卫生系统总费用。结果:与经验诊断(n = 239,250)、抗原检测(n = 347,218)和发送PCR (n = 280,527)相比,Xpert Xpress与最高的净正确疗程数(n = 443,600)相关。收购成本最高的是Xpert Xpress(3840万欧元,抗原检测为2740万欧元,送出PCR为3350万欧元),但住院和重症监护费用的减少抵消了这一成本。总体而言,与经验性诊断相比,Xpert Xpress节省了197万欧元的成本,与抗原检测相比节省了1010万欧元的成本,与发送式PCR相比节省了2080万欧元的成本。结论:在POC中使用Xpert Xpress结合了快速周转和高诊断准确性,从而增加了正确的治疗疗程,同时降低了流感、COVID-19和RSV的总成本,为德国SHI提供了大量节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Point of Care Nucleic Acid Testing for Influenza-Like Illness: A Cost–Consequence Analysis for High-Risk Patients in Primary Care in Germany

Introduction

Influenza A/B virus, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause similar symptoms, often referred to as influenza-like illness, but require different treatments which must be administered within a short timeframe after symptom onset. This necessitates rapid detection and accurate differentiation by primary care providers, ideally at point of care (POC). POC nucleic acid tests such as the multiplex, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus (Xpert Xpress) offer a faster, more accurate alternative compared to antigen testing, clinical judgement alone, or send-out PCR. This cost–consequence analysis evaluated Xpert Xpress versus conventional testing methods, from a German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.

Methods

A 1-year decision tree was developed to compare Xpert Xpress with antigen testing, send-out PCR, and empiric diagnosis, for influenza A/B virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. The model accounted for diagnostic accuracy and projected the share of patients receiving results within guideline-recommended treatment windows. Data on test accuracy, treatment effects, and costs were sourced from literature and German databases. The main outcome was total cost to the SHI for the 2023/24 respiratory illness season.

Results

Xpert Xpress was associated with the highest number of net correct treatment courses (n = 443,600) versus empiric diagnosis (n = 239,250), antigen testing (n = 347,218), and send-out PCR (n = 280,527). Acquisition costs were highest for Xpert Xpress (EUR 38.4 million versus EUR 27.4 million for antigen testing and EUR 33.5 million for send-out PCR) but were offset by reduced hospitalization and intensive care costs. Overall, Xpert Xpress was associated with cost savings of EUR 1.97 million versus empiric diagnosis, EUR 10.1 million versus antigen testing, and EUR 20.8 million versus send-out PCR.

Conclusions

Using Xpert Xpress at POC combined fast turnaround with high diagnostic accuracy, thereby increasing correct treatment courses while reducing total costs for influenza, COVID-19, and RSV, offering substantial savings to the German SHI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信