抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂在预防双相情感障碍患者缺勤中的作用:一项全国性的基于登记的研究。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Minna Holm, Antti Tanskanen, Jari Tiihonen, Heidi Taipale
{"title":"抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂在预防双相情感障碍患者缺勤中的作用:一项全国性的基于登记的研究。","authors":"Minna Holm,&nbsp;Antti Tanskanen,&nbsp;Jari Tiihonen,&nbsp;Heidi Taipale","doi":"10.1111/acps.13806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Medication use may significantly affect work ability in bipolar disorder, but this area has been largely overlooked in research. We aimed to investigate how specific mood stabilizer and antipsychotic agents are associated with the risk of sickness absence among employed individuals with bipolar disorder.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified a nationwide cohort of 22,408 employed individuals with bipolar disorder, including 10,000 first-episode cases, and followed them from 2005 to 2018 through the nationwide administrative registers. The risk of sickness absence was analyzed using within-individual Cox regression where each person serves as their own control to eliminate selection bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the whole cohort, the monotherapies of lithium (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–0.84), valproate (HR = 0.77, 0.70–0.85), and lamotrigine (HR = 0.87, 0.80–0.95) were associated with a lower risk of sickness absence than nonuse of mood stabilizers. In contrast, pregabalin monotherapy was associated with an increased risk of sickness absence (HR = 1.63, 1.34–1.99). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence (HR = 0.75, 0.66–0.86) than antipsychotic nonuse. In the first-episode sample, lithium (HR = 0.51, 0.41–0.64), valproate (HR = 0.63, 0.52–0.75), lamotrigine (HR = 0.79, 0.68–0.91), and olanzapine (HR = 0.69, 0.54–0.87) monotherapies were associated with a lower hazard of sickness absence than nonuse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Mood stabilizers including lithium, valproate, and lamotrigine, as well as olanzapine, of antipsychotics may reduce the risk of sickness absence, particularly, in first-episode patients. These findings encourage the continuous use of these medications to support occupational functioning among people with bipolar disorder.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"152 2","pages":"104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers in Preventing Sickness Absence Among Employed Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: A Nationwide Register-Based Study\",\"authors\":\"Minna Holm,&nbsp;Antti Tanskanen,&nbsp;Jari Tiihonen,&nbsp;Heidi Taipale\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medication use may significantly affect work ability in bipolar disorder, but this area has been largely overlooked in research. We aimed to investigate how specific mood stabilizer and antipsychotic agents are associated with the risk of sickness absence among employed individuals with bipolar disorder.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified a nationwide cohort of 22,408 employed individuals with bipolar disorder, including 10,000 first-episode cases, and followed them from 2005 to 2018 through the nationwide administrative registers. The risk of sickness absence was analyzed using within-individual Cox regression where each person serves as their own control to eliminate selection bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the whole cohort, the monotherapies of lithium (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–0.84), valproate (HR = 0.77, 0.70–0.85), and lamotrigine (HR = 0.87, 0.80–0.95) were associated with a lower risk of sickness absence than nonuse of mood stabilizers. In contrast, pregabalin monotherapy was associated with an increased risk of sickness absence (HR = 1.63, 1.34–1.99). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence (HR = 0.75, 0.66–0.86) than antipsychotic nonuse. In the first-episode sample, lithium (HR = 0.51, 0.41–0.64), valproate (HR = 0.63, 0.52–0.75), lamotrigine (HR = 0.79, 0.68–0.91), and olanzapine (HR = 0.69, 0.54–0.87) monotherapies were associated with a lower hazard of sickness absence than nonuse.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mood stabilizers including lithium, valproate, and lamotrigine, as well as olanzapine, of antipsychotics may reduce the risk of sickness absence, particularly, in first-episode patients. These findings encourage the continuous use of these medications to support occupational functioning among people with bipolar disorder.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"152 2\",\"pages\":\"104-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13806\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物使用可能会显著影响双相情感障碍患者的工作能力,但这方面的研究在很大程度上被忽视了。我们的目的是调查特定的情绪稳定剂和抗精神病药物如何与双相情感障碍就业个体的缺勤风险相关。方法:我们在全国范围内确定了22,408名双相情感障碍患者的队列,包括10,000例首发病例,并从2005年到2018年通过全国行政登记对他们进行了跟踪。使用个体内Cox回归分析缺勤风险,其中每个人作为自己的对照以消除选择偏差。结果:在整个队列中,锂(HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66-0.84)、丙戊酸盐(HR = 0.77, 0.70-0.85)和拉莫三嗪(HR = 0.87, 0.80-0.95)的单一治疗与不使用情绪稳定剂的疾病缺席风险较低相关。相比之下,普瑞巴林单药治疗与缺勤风险增加相关(HR = 1.63, 1.34-1.99)。在抗精神病药物中,与未使用抗精神病药物相比,奥氮平与较低的疾病缺勤风险相关(HR = 0.75, 0.66-0.86)。在首次发作的样本中,锂(HR = 0.51, 0.41-0.64)、丙戊酸盐(HR = 0.63, 0.52-0.75)、拉莫三嗪(HR = 0.79, 0.68-0.91)和奥氮平(HR = 0.69, 0.54-0.87)单一疗法与缺勤的风险较低相关。结论:情绪稳定剂包括锂、丙戊酸盐、拉莫三嗪和奥氮平,抗精神病药物可以降低疾病缺勤的风险,特别是在首发患者中。这些发现鼓励持续使用这些药物来支持双相情感障碍患者的职业功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers in Preventing Sickness Absence Among Employed Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: A Nationwide Register-Based Study

Introduction

Medication use may significantly affect work ability in bipolar disorder, but this area has been largely overlooked in research. We aimed to investigate how specific mood stabilizer and antipsychotic agents are associated with the risk of sickness absence among employed individuals with bipolar disorder.

Methods

We identified a nationwide cohort of 22,408 employed individuals with bipolar disorder, including 10,000 first-episode cases, and followed them from 2005 to 2018 through the nationwide administrative registers. The risk of sickness absence was analyzed using within-individual Cox regression where each person serves as their own control to eliminate selection bias.

Results

In the whole cohort, the monotherapies of lithium (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–0.84), valproate (HR = 0.77, 0.70–0.85), and lamotrigine (HR = 0.87, 0.80–0.95) were associated with a lower risk of sickness absence than nonuse of mood stabilizers. In contrast, pregabalin monotherapy was associated with an increased risk of sickness absence (HR = 1.63, 1.34–1.99). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence (HR = 0.75, 0.66–0.86) than antipsychotic nonuse. In the first-episode sample, lithium (HR = 0.51, 0.41–0.64), valproate (HR = 0.63, 0.52–0.75), lamotrigine (HR = 0.79, 0.68–0.91), and olanzapine (HR = 0.69, 0.54–0.87) monotherapies were associated with a lower hazard of sickness absence than nonuse.

Conclusions

Mood stabilizers including lithium, valproate, and lamotrigine, as well as olanzapine, of antipsychotics may reduce the risk of sickness absence, particularly, in first-episode patients. These findings encourage the continuous use of these medications to support occupational functioning among people with bipolar disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信