根治性前列腺切除术与80岁以上患者的良好预后相关。

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/NKGS2301
Isaac E Kim, Michael S Leapman, Micah J Kim, Syed Rahman, Preston Sprenkle, Joseph Renzulli, Joseph Brito, Elias Hyams, Joseph Kim, Gyan Pareek, Isaac Yi Kim
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术与80岁以上患者的良好预后相关。","authors":"Isaac E Kim, Michael S Leapman, Micah J Kim, Syed Rahman, Preston Sprenkle, Joseph Renzulli, Joseph Brito, Elias Hyams, Joseph Kim, Gyan Pareek, Isaac Yi Kim","doi":"10.62347/NKGS2301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>Although surgery is less commonly selected as treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) as patients age, outcomes among older patients treated with radical prostatectomy remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare survival across non-definitive therapy (NDT), radiotherapy, and radical prostatectomy (RP) among men older than 80 years old.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the SEER-17 database, we identified patients ≥80 years at diagnosis with localized prostate cancer in 2000-2021 who were initially managed with NDT, radiotherapy, or RP. We compared overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 53,437 patients with PCa≥80 years including 35,728 (68.2%) who underwent NDT, 15,906 (30.4%) treated with radiotherapy, and 736 (1.4%) with RP. The median age was 83 years (IQR: 81-85) and median PSA at diagnosis was 10.7 ng/mL (IQR: 6.7-19.9). Median OS was 66, 102 and 116 months for patients managed with NDT, radiotherapy, and RP, respectively (OS-P<0.01, PCSS-P<0.01). Cox regression revealed that compared to NDT, radiotherapy (OS-baseline adjusted hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.51, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.51, P<0.01) and RP were associated with higher OS and PCSS (OS-baHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.46, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42, P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that well-selected patients ≥80 years may experience favorable survival following RP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"13 1","pages":"33-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical prostatectomy is associated with favorable outcomes in patients over 80 years old.\",\"authors\":\"Isaac E Kim, Michael S Leapman, Micah J Kim, Syed Rahman, Preston Sprenkle, Joseph Renzulli, Joseph Brito, Elias Hyams, Joseph Kim, Gyan Pareek, Isaac Yi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/NKGS2301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>Although surgery is less commonly selected as treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) as patients age, outcomes among older patients treated with radical prostatectomy remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare survival across non-definitive therapy (NDT), radiotherapy, and radical prostatectomy (RP) among men older than 80 years old.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the SEER-17 database, we identified patients ≥80 years at diagnosis with localized prostate cancer in 2000-2021 who were initially managed with NDT, radiotherapy, or RP. We compared overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 53,437 patients with PCa≥80 years including 35,728 (68.2%) who underwent NDT, 15,906 (30.4%) treated with radiotherapy, and 736 (1.4%) with RP. The median age was 83 years (IQR: 81-85) and median PSA at diagnosis was 10.7 ng/mL (IQR: 6.7-19.9). Median OS was 66, 102 and 116 months for patients managed with NDT, radiotherapy, and RP, respectively (OS-P<0.01, PCSS-P<0.01). Cox regression revealed that compared to NDT, radiotherapy (OS-baseline adjusted hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.51, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.51, P<0.01) and RP were associated with higher OS and PCSS (OS-baHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.46, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42, P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that well-selected patients ≥80 years may experience favorable survival following RP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"33-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928824/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/NKGS2301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/NKGS2301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/背景:虽然随着患者年龄的增长,手术作为局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗方法越来越少,但接受根治性前列腺切除术的老年患者的预后仍不清楚。本研究的目的是比较80岁以上男性非确定性治疗(NDT)、放疗和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的生存率。材料和方法:使用SEER-17数据库,我们确定了2000-2021年诊断为局限性前列腺癌≥80岁的患者,这些患者最初采用无损检测、放疗或RP进行治疗。我们比较了总生存率(OS)和前列腺癌特异性生存率(PCSS)。结果:我们确定了53,437例PCa≥80年的患者,其中35,728例(68.2%)接受了NDT, 15,906例(30.4%)接受了放疗,736例(1.4%)接受了RP。中位年龄为83岁(IQR: 81-85),诊断时中位PSA为10.7 ng/mL (IQR: 6.7-19.9)。NDT、放疗和RP患者的中位生存期分别为66,102和116个月(OS- p)。结论:这些研究结果表明,经过精心挑选的≥80岁的患者可能会在RP后获得良好的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical prostatectomy is associated with favorable outcomes in patients over 80 years old.

Introduction/background: Although surgery is less commonly selected as treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) as patients age, outcomes among older patients treated with radical prostatectomy remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare survival across non-definitive therapy (NDT), radiotherapy, and radical prostatectomy (RP) among men older than 80 years old.

Materials and methods: Using the SEER-17 database, we identified patients ≥80 years at diagnosis with localized prostate cancer in 2000-2021 who were initially managed with NDT, radiotherapy, or RP. We compared overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS).

Results: We identified 53,437 patients with PCa≥80 years including 35,728 (68.2%) who underwent NDT, 15,906 (30.4%) treated with radiotherapy, and 736 (1.4%) with RP. The median age was 83 years (IQR: 81-85) and median PSA at diagnosis was 10.7 ng/mL (IQR: 6.7-19.9). Median OS was 66, 102 and 116 months for patients managed with NDT, radiotherapy, and RP, respectively (OS-P<0.01, PCSS-P<0.01). Cox regression revealed that compared to NDT, radiotherapy (OS-baseline adjusted hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.51, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.51, P<0.01) and RP were associated with higher OS and PCSS (OS-baHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.46, P<0.01; PCSS-baHR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42, P<0.01).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that well-selected patients ≥80 years may experience favorable survival following RP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信