减少低收入和中等收入国家非传染性疾病风险的以饮食为重点的行为干预:对现有证据的范围审查。

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1111/obr.13918
Averi Chakrabarti, Nathan Ellermeier, Arpita Tripathi, Harsha Thirumurthy, Rachel Nugent
{"title":"减少低收入和中等收入国家非传染性疾病风险的以饮食为重点的行为干预:对现有证据的范围审查。","authors":"Averi Chakrabarti,&nbsp;Nathan Ellermeier,&nbsp;Arpita Tripathi,&nbsp;Harsha Thirumurthy,&nbsp;Rachel Nugent","doi":"10.1111/obr.13918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are on the rise worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bearing more than three-quarters of global deaths from NCDs. Unhealthy diet is a major risk factor for NCDs. This scoping review compiles evidence on the effectiveness of diet-focused behavioral interventions in LMICs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a search of five databases to identify studies that evaluated a broad set of behavioral interventions to address diet in LMICs. The final sample comprised 52 studies. The interventions investigated were education (N = 10), messaging (N = 12), multi-component (N = 26), and others (N = 4). Fiscal interventions were excluded as their impacts have been widely studied in prior research. The most common evaluation methods were randomized controlled trials (N = 31) followed by pre-post comparisons (N = 13). We extracted effect sizes for: biological risk factors (such as cholesterol or body mass index), nutritional intake for different food groups (e.g., fruits and vegetables), and nutritional knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Studies of behavioral interventions to promote dietary change reported a broad range of outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes were body mass index (BMI), intake of specific foods, and nutrition knowledge. Most interventions produced small effects in the expected direction. Many of the studies fell short of quality measures, with quality being affected by small sample sizes, no adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing, and a lack of objectively measured outcomes. A few LMICs were heavily represented. Overall, there was limited evidence on how to effectively promote healthier diets through behavioral interventions in LMICs. Existing studies have examined a narrow range of interventions and provided little evidence that health outcomes substantially improved.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diet-focused behavioral interventions to reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of existing evidence\",\"authors\":\"Averi Chakrabarti,&nbsp;Nathan Ellermeier,&nbsp;Arpita Tripathi,&nbsp;Harsha Thirumurthy,&nbsp;Rachel Nugent\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are on the rise worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bearing more than three-quarters of global deaths from NCDs. Unhealthy diet is a major risk factor for NCDs. This scoping review compiles evidence on the effectiveness of diet-focused behavioral interventions in LMICs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a search of five databases to identify studies that evaluated a broad set of behavioral interventions to address diet in LMICs. The final sample comprised 52 studies. The interventions investigated were education (N = 10), messaging (N = 12), multi-component (N = 26), and others (N = 4). Fiscal interventions were excluded as their impacts have been widely studied in prior research. The most common evaluation methods were randomized controlled trials (N = 31) followed by pre-post comparisons (N = 13). We extracted effect sizes for: biological risk factors (such as cholesterol or body mass index), nutritional intake for different food groups (e.g., fruits and vegetables), and nutritional knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Studies of behavioral interventions to promote dietary change reported a broad range of outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes were body mass index (BMI), intake of specific foods, and nutrition knowledge. Most interventions produced small effects in the expected direction. Many of the studies fell short of quality measures, with quality being affected by small sample sizes, no adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing, and a lack of objectively measured outcomes. A few LMICs were heavily represented. Overall, there was limited evidence on how to effectively promote healthier diets through behavioral interventions in LMICs. Existing studies have examined a narrow range of interventions and provided little evidence that health outcomes substantially improved.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13918\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非传染性疾病在世界范围内呈上升趋势,低收入和中等收入国家占全球非传染性疾病死亡人数的四分之三以上。不健康饮食是非传染性疾病的一个主要风险因素。本综述收集了中低收入国家饮食行为干预有效性的证据。方法:我们对五个数据库进行了搜索,以确定评估一系列行为干预措施以解决中低收入国家饮食问题的研究。最终样本包括52项研究。调查的干预措施包括教育(N = 10)、信息传递(N = 12)、多成分(N = 26)和其他(N = 4)。财政干预被排除在外,因为其影响已经在先前的研究中得到了广泛的研究。最常用的评价方法是随机对照试验(N = 31),然后进行前后比较(N = 13)。我们提取了以下因素的效应量:生物风险因素(如胆固醇或体重指数)、不同食物组的营养摄入量(如水果和蔬菜)以及营养知识。结果:促进饮食改变的行为干预研究报告了广泛的结果。最常见的报告结果是身体质量指数(BMI)、特定食物的摄入量和营养知识。大多数干预措施在预期的方向上产生了很小的影响。许多研究缺乏质量测量,质量受到样本量小、没有对多假设检验进行调整以及缺乏客观测量结果的影响。少数中低收入国家的代表人数很多。总体而言,关于中低收入国家如何通过行为干预有效促进健康饮食的证据有限。现有的研究检查了范围狭窄的干预措施,几乎没有证据表明健康结果得到了实质性改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diet-focused behavioral interventions to reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of existing evidence

Purpose

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are on the rise worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bearing more than three-quarters of global deaths from NCDs. Unhealthy diet is a major risk factor for NCDs. This scoping review compiles evidence on the effectiveness of diet-focused behavioral interventions in LMICs.

Methods

We conducted a search of five databases to identify studies that evaluated a broad set of behavioral interventions to address diet in LMICs. The final sample comprised 52 studies. The interventions investigated were education (N = 10), messaging (N = 12), multi-component (N = 26), and others (N = 4). Fiscal interventions were excluded as their impacts have been widely studied in prior research. The most common evaluation methods were randomized controlled trials (N = 31) followed by pre-post comparisons (N = 13). We extracted effect sizes for: biological risk factors (such as cholesterol or body mass index), nutritional intake for different food groups (e.g., fruits and vegetables), and nutritional knowledge.

Results

Studies of behavioral interventions to promote dietary change reported a broad range of outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes were body mass index (BMI), intake of specific foods, and nutrition knowledge. Most interventions produced small effects in the expected direction. Many of the studies fell short of quality measures, with quality being affected by small sample sizes, no adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing, and a lack of objectively measured outcomes. A few LMICs were heavily represented. Overall, there was limited evidence on how to effectively promote healthier diets through behavioral interventions in LMICs. Existing studies have examined a narrow range of interventions and provided little evidence that health outcomes substantially improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信