没有控制盆地的未来:美国西部复合森林干扰和未受干扰的森林集水区的消失

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/eco.2750
Katie E. Schneider, Terri Hogue
{"title":"没有控制盆地的未来:美国西部复合森林干扰和未受干扰的森林集水区的消失","authors":"Katie E. Schneider,&nbsp;Terri Hogue","doi":"10.1002/eco.2750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent decades, forest disturbances caused by wildfire, insect and disease-induced forest mortality and drought have increased in frequency and magnitude, especially in the Western United States. Forest disturbances have been shown to alter water budget partitioning. However, the water budget response to disturbance is inconsistent and is still being characterized within forest disturbance hydrology (FDH) literature. In this review and synthesis, we evaluate how FDH literature has grown in recent decades (2000–2021), and we extract papers discussing compound (or overlapping) forest disturbances in the Western United States. We then compare literature findings with the actual prevalence of forest disturbance (caused by wildfire, insects and disease) in forested catchments in the Western United States, at HUC-8, −10 and −12 scales. We find that 94% of HUC-8 basins, 85% of HUC-10 basins, and 60% of HUC-12 basins have experienced compound wildfire and insect/disease disturbance over the period 2000–2022, and virtually, no basins remain undisturbed. These figures contrast with recent FDH literature, where relatively few studies evaluate the hydrologic implications of compound disturbances. These findings suggest that FDH literature is not ‘meeting the moment’ and perhaps, more critically, that true control (or ‘static’) basins are nearly nonexistent in the Western United States. We highlight that as a community of ecohydrologists, we must rethink how we assess post-disturbance water budget partitioning. This will require better tools (e.g., models) to assess post-disturbance hydrology, more observations and especially cross-disciplinary collaborations between hydrology and forestry communities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Future Without Control Basins: Compound Forest Disturbance and the Disappearance of Undisturbed Forested Catchments in the Western United States\",\"authors\":\"Katie E. Schneider,&nbsp;Terri Hogue\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.2750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In recent decades, forest disturbances caused by wildfire, insect and disease-induced forest mortality and drought have increased in frequency and magnitude, especially in the Western United States. Forest disturbances have been shown to alter water budget partitioning. However, the water budget response to disturbance is inconsistent and is still being characterized within forest disturbance hydrology (FDH) literature. In this review and synthesis, we evaluate how FDH literature has grown in recent decades (2000–2021), and we extract papers discussing compound (or overlapping) forest disturbances in the Western United States. We then compare literature findings with the actual prevalence of forest disturbance (caused by wildfire, insects and disease) in forested catchments in the Western United States, at HUC-8, −10 and −12 scales. We find that 94% of HUC-8 basins, 85% of HUC-10 basins, and 60% of HUC-12 basins have experienced compound wildfire and insect/disease disturbance over the period 2000–2022, and virtually, no basins remain undisturbed. These figures contrast with recent FDH literature, where relatively few studies evaluate the hydrologic implications of compound disturbances. These findings suggest that FDH literature is not ‘meeting the moment’ and perhaps, more critically, that true control (or ‘static’) basins are nearly nonexistent in the Western United States. We highlight that as a community of ecohydrologists, we must rethink how we assess post-disturbance water budget partitioning. This will require better tools (e.g., models) to assess post-disturbance hydrology, more observations and especially cross-disciplinary collaborations between hydrology and forestry communities.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2750\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,野火、虫害和疾病引起的森林死亡和干旱造成的森林干扰在频率和程度上都有所增加,特别是在美国西部。森林干扰已被证明会改变水分收支分配。然而,水收支对扰动的响应是不一致的,并且在森林扰动水文学(FDH)文献中仍然被表征。在这篇综述和综合中,我们评估了近几十年(2000-2021年)外籍佣工文献的增长情况,并提取了讨论美国西部复合(或重叠)森林干扰的论文。然后,我们将文献研究结果与美国西部森林流域森林干扰(由野火、昆虫和疾病引起)的实际流行率在HUC-8、- 10和- 12尺度上进行了比较。研究发现,在2000-2022年期间,94%的HUC-8流域、85%的HUC-10流域和60%的HUC-12流域经历了野火和病虫害的复合干扰,几乎没有一个流域未受到干扰。这些数字与最近的外佣文献形成对比,其中相对较少的研究评估了复合扰动的水文影响。这些发现表明,FDH文献并没有“满足时宜”,也许,更关键的是,真正的控制(或“静态”)盆地在美国西部几乎不存在。我们强调,作为一个生态水文学家社区,我们必须重新思考如何评估干扰后的水预算分配。这将需要更好的工具(例如,模型)来评估扰动后的水文,需要更多的观测,特别是水文学和林业社区之间的跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Future Without Control Basins: Compound Forest Disturbance and the Disappearance of Undisturbed Forested Catchments in the Western United States

In recent decades, forest disturbances caused by wildfire, insect and disease-induced forest mortality and drought have increased in frequency and magnitude, especially in the Western United States. Forest disturbances have been shown to alter water budget partitioning. However, the water budget response to disturbance is inconsistent and is still being characterized within forest disturbance hydrology (FDH) literature. In this review and synthesis, we evaluate how FDH literature has grown in recent decades (2000–2021), and we extract papers discussing compound (or overlapping) forest disturbances in the Western United States. We then compare literature findings with the actual prevalence of forest disturbance (caused by wildfire, insects and disease) in forested catchments in the Western United States, at HUC-8, −10 and −12 scales. We find that 94% of HUC-8 basins, 85% of HUC-10 basins, and 60% of HUC-12 basins have experienced compound wildfire and insect/disease disturbance over the period 2000–2022, and virtually, no basins remain undisturbed. These figures contrast with recent FDH literature, where relatively few studies evaluate the hydrologic implications of compound disturbances. These findings suggest that FDH literature is not ‘meeting the moment’ and perhaps, more critically, that true control (or ‘static’) basins are nearly nonexistent in the Western United States. We highlight that as a community of ecohydrologists, we must rethink how we assess post-disturbance water budget partitioning. This will require better tools (e.g., models) to assess post-disturbance hydrology, more observations and especially cross-disciplinary collaborations between hydrology and forestry communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信