{"title":"青年首发精神病恢复期社会认知与社交圈大小、社会支持的关系","authors":"Janneke van Houts, Barbara Montagne","doi":"10.1111/eip.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Young adults who experienced first episode psychosis (FEP) show impairments in social cognition, have smaller social circles, and experience less social support compared to their peers. While social cognition is important for social functioning, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive skills are related to social circle size or social support. It was examined whether participants with FEP and impairments in social cognition have smaller social circles and/or experience less social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study comparing 35 FEP participants in early recovery and 35 well-matched controls on measures of emotion perception, theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social circle size, and social support, and the relationship between social cognitive impairment, social circle size, and social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant differences between the two groups were found only for ToM and not for emotion perception or social perception. FEP participants had a significantly smaller social circle size and perceived significantly less social support. Correlations between ToM and social circle size or social support were limited, with no significant differences when compared at the group level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>FEP participants and controls differ on social circle size and social support, while concerning social cognition, there was only a difference found on ToM between both groups. Questions are raised as to whether social cognition is related to social circle size or perceived social support in early recovery of FEP. While mechanisms influencing social circle size and social support need further research, it is important to continue to focus on social contact after FEP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship of Social Cognition on Social Circle Size and Social Support in Young Adults Recovering From First Episode Psychosis\",\"authors\":\"Janneke van Houts, Barbara Montagne\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Young adults who experienced first episode psychosis (FEP) show impairments in social cognition, have smaller social circles, and experience less social support compared to their peers. While social cognition is important for social functioning, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive skills are related to social circle size or social support. It was examined whether participants with FEP and impairments in social cognition have smaller social circles and/or experience less social support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study comparing 35 FEP participants in early recovery and 35 well-matched controls on measures of emotion perception, theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social circle size, and social support, and the relationship between social cognitive impairment, social circle size, and social support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Significant differences between the two groups were found only for ToM and not for emotion perception or social perception. FEP participants had a significantly smaller social circle size and perceived significantly less social support. Correlations between ToM and social circle size or social support were limited, with no significant differences when compared at the group level.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>FEP participants and controls differ on social circle size and social support, while concerning social cognition, there was only a difference found on ToM between both groups. Questions are raised as to whether social cognition is related to social circle size or perceived social support in early recovery of FEP. While mechanisms influencing social circle size and social support need further research, it is important to continue to focus on social contact after FEP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationship of Social Cognition on Social Circle Size and Social Support in Young Adults Recovering From First Episode Psychosis
Background
Young adults who experienced first episode psychosis (FEP) show impairments in social cognition, have smaller social circles, and experience less social support compared to their peers. While social cognition is important for social functioning, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive skills are related to social circle size or social support. It was examined whether participants with FEP and impairments in social cognition have smaller social circles and/or experience less social support.
Method
A cross-sectional study comparing 35 FEP participants in early recovery and 35 well-matched controls on measures of emotion perception, theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social circle size, and social support, and the relationship between social cognitive impairment, social circle size, and social support.
Results
Significant differences between the two groups were found only for ToM and not for emotion perception or social perception. FEP participants had a significantly smaller social circle size and perceived significantly less social support. Correlations between ToM and social circle size or social support were limited, with no significant differences when compared at the group level.
Conclusion
FEP participants and controls differ on social circle size and social support, while concerning social cognition, there was only a difference found on ToM between both groups. Questions are raised as to whether social cognition is related to social circle size or perceived social support in early recovery of FEP. While mechanisms influencing social circle size and social support need further research, it is important to continue to focus on social contact after FEP.
期刊介绍:
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.