靶向调节皮肤微生物组是否会成为寻常性痤疮治疗的未来?

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Kornélia Szabó, Lajos Kemény
{"title":"靶向调节皮肤微生物组是否会成为寻常性痤疮治疗的未来?","authors":"Kornélia Szabó,&nbsp;Lajos Kemény","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Throughout our lives, we encounter a multitude of microbes, but only a limited number of them become integral components of the specialized ecosystem that makes up our bodies. In particular, members of the skin microbiota play a key role in maintaining homeostasis and ensuring optimal skin function. Changes in its composition and the specific species present are often associated with the onset of various disease states. A prime example of this phenomenon is acne vulgaris, where the skin microbiota, in particularly the role of <i>C. acnes</i>, has long been suspected.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>The recent systematic review by Podwojniak et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> sought to critically evaluate this question through a systematic review, to summarize the related knowledge published to date, and to raise awareness of the possibility of targeted and systematic microbiota modulation as a potential therapeutic approach to treat this condition.</p><p>The authors conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and SCOPUS databases, selecting 26 high-quality studies for inclusion in their analysis. One of the contributions of this study is its comprehensive review of the key microbial players in acne pathogenesis. They provide data that the majority of available studies indeed confirm that either <i>C. acnes</i>, or certain ribotypes within the species, are associated with the disease compared to healthy skin.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This reinforces the notion of a pathogenic role for <i>C. acnes</i>, despite the fact that the bacterium also plays an important role as a member of the healthy skin microflora.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>In diseases where the microbiota changes are important factors, dysbiosis is frequently linked to changes in alpha diversity, which quantifies the species richness in a particular sample. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the variation of alpha diversity with the development of acne lesions, thus it is evident that systematic, large, well-controlled studies are imperative for the advancement of this field in the near future.</p><p>Available therapeutic modalities employed in the treatment of acne principally target the inflammatory processes associated with lesion development, the microbial component and sebum production.<span><sup>5</sup></span> The latter, in turn, exerts an indirect influence on lipophilic microbes by modulating sebum levels. This article summarizes acne treatments that are known to affect the cutaneous microbiome, and summarizes their findings. While the analysis indicated that only benzoyl peroxide exhibited a substantial impact on microbiota composition, this may be attributable to the limited amount of data available for other treatments currently in use. However, given the established efficacy of this molecule in the treatment of acne, these results substantiate the notion that modifying the composition of the microbiota constitutes a promising approach in the management of this condition.</p><p>The authors' exploration of novel treatments, including topical probiotics and plant derivatives, underscores the potential for future research in this area. These approaches may offer a means to directly modulate dysbiosis and, consequently, inflammation, while preserving microbial diversity and maintaining a healthy skin microbiome. However, it is important to acknowledge the numerous challenges that currently impede progress in this domain. The long-term implications of modifying the skin microbiome remain to be fully elucidated, and the potential for unintended consequences on skin health and immunity is a salient concern. The heterogeneity of study types, sampling techniques and microbiome classifications poses a significant challenge to the generalizability of findings, underscoring the pressing need for standardized methodologies in microbiome research. Consequently, future studies should prioritize the enrolment of larger, more uniform cohorts and the implementation of consistent analytical approaches. The proposed personalized approaches in microbiome modulation is also particularly interesting. The development of specialized diagnostic tools to assess an individual's cutaneous microbiome and its alterations is crucial for informed treatment decisions.</p><p>None.</p><p>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"39 4","pages":"715-716"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdv.20587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will targeted microbiome modulation in the skin be the future of acne vulgaris treatment?\",\"authors\":\"Kornélia Szabó,&nbsp;Lajos Kemény\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jdv.20587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Throughout our lives, we encounter a multitude of microbes, but only a limited number of them become integral components of the specialized ecosystem that makes up our bodies. In particular, members of the skin microbiota play a key role in maintaining homeostasis and ensuring optimal skin function. Changes in its composition and the specific species present are often associated with the onset of various disease states. A prime example of this phenomenon is acne vulgaris, where the skin microbiota, in particularly the role of <i>C. acnes</i>, has long been suspected.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>The recent systematic review by Podwojniak et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> sought to critically evaluate this question through a systematic review, to summarize the related knowledge published to date, and to raise awareness of the possibility of targeted and systematic microbiota modulation as a potential therapeutic approach to treat this condition.</p><p>The authors conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and SCOPUS databases, selecting 26 high-quality studies for inclusion in their analysis. One of the contributions of this study is its comprehensive review of the key microbial players in acne pathogenesis. They provide data that the majority of available studies indeed confirm that either <i>C. acnes</i>, or certain ribotypes within the species, are associated with the disease compared to healthy skin.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This reinforces the notion of a pathogenic role for <i>C. acnes</i>, despite the fact that the bacterium also plays an important role as a member of the healthy skin microflora.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>In diseases where the microbiota changes are important factors, dysbiosis is frequently linked to changes in alpha diversity, which quantifies the species richness in a particular sample. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the variation of alpha diversity with the development of acne lesions, thus it is evident that systematic, large, well-controlled studies are imperative for the advancement of this field in the near future.</p><p>Available therapeutic modalities employed in the treatment of acne principally target the inflammatory processes associated with lesion development, the microbial component and sebum production.<span><sup>5</sup></span> The latter, in turn, exerts an indirect influence on lipophilic microbes by modulating sebum levels. This article summarizes acne treatments that are known to affect the cutaneous microbiome, and summarizes their findings. While the analysis indicated that only benzoyl peroxide exhibited a substantial impact on microbiota composition, this may be attributable to the limited amount of data available for other treatments currently in use. However, given the established efficacy of this molecule in the treatment of acne, these results substantiate the notion that modifying the composition of the microbiota constitutes a promising approach in the management of this condition.</p><p>The authors' exploration of novel treatments, including topical probiotics and plant derivatives, underscores the potential for future research in this area. These approaches may offer a means to directly modulate dysbiosis and, consequently, inflammation, while preserving microbial diversity and maintaining a healthy skin microbiome. However, it is important to acknowledge the numerous challenges that currently impede progress in this domain. The long-term implications of modifying the skin microbiome remain to be fully elucidated, and the potential for unintended consequences on skin health and immunity is a salient concern. The heterogeneity of study types, sampling techniques and microbiome classifications poses a significant challenge to the generalizability of findings, underscoring the pressing need for standardized methodologies in microbiome research. Consequently, future studies should prioritize the enrolment of larger, more uniform cohorts and the implementation of consistent analytical approaches. The proposed personalized approaches in microbiome modulation is also particularly interesting. The development of specialized diagnostic tools to assess an individual's cutaneous microbiome and its alterations is crucial for informed treatment decisions.</p><p>None.</p><p>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"715-716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdv.20587\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们的一生中,我们会遇到许许多多的微生物,但只有数量有限的微生物会成为构成我们身体的特殊生态系统中不可或缺的组成部分。尤其是皮肤微生物群,它们在维持皮肤平衡和确保最佳皮肤功能方面发挥着关键作用。皮肤微生物群的组成和特定物种的变化往往与各种疾病的发病有关。1 Podwojniak 等人最近的系统综述2 试图通过系统综述批判性地评估这一问题,总结迄今为止已发表的相关知识,并提高人们对有针对性和系统性地调节微生物群作为治疗这种疾病的潜在疗法的可能性的认识。这项研究的贡献之一是全面回顾了痤疮发病机制中的关键微生物。他们提供的数据表明,与健康皮肤相比,大多数现有研究确实证实痤疮丙酸杆菌或该菌种中的某些核型与痤疮有关。4 在微生物群变化是重要因素的疾病中,菌群失调经常与 alpha 多样性(量化特定样本中物种的丰富程度)的变化有关。目前,有关α多样性随痤疮皮损发展而变化的数据还很少,因此,要在不久的将来推动这一领域的发展,系统、大型、良好控制的研究显然势在必行。5 目前治疗痤疮的方法主要针对与皮损发展相关的炎症过程、微生物成分和皮脂分泌,而后者又通过调节皮脂水平对亲脂微生物产生间接影响。本文概述了已知会影响皮肤微生物群的痤疮治疗方法,并总结了其研究结果。虽然分析表明只有过氧化苯甲酰对微生物群的组成有实质性影响,但这可能是由于目前使用的其他治疗方法的数据量有限。然而,鉴于过氧化苯甲酰分子在治疗痤疮方面的公认疗效,这些结果证实了这样一种观点,即改变微生物群的组成是治疗痤疮的一种很有前景的方法。作者对包括局部益生菌和植物衍生物在内的新型治疗方法的探索强调了这一领域未来研究的潜力。这些方法可以直接调节菌群失调,从而缓解炎症,同时保护微生物多样性,维持健康的皮肤微生物群。然而,重要的是要承认目前阻碍这一领域进展的众多挑战。改变皮肤微生物群的长期影响仍有待全面阐明,而对皮肤健康和免疫力可能造成的意外后果也是一个突出的问题。研究类型、采样技术和微生物组分类的异质性对研究结果的普遍性提出了巨大挑战,这突出表明微生物组研究迫切需要标准化方法。因此,未来的研究应优先考虑招募更大、更统一的队列,并采用一致的分析方法。微生物组调节的个性化方法建议也特别有趣。开发专门的诊断工具来评估个人的皮肤微生物组及其变化,对于做出明智的治疗决定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will targeted microbiome modulation in the skin be the future of acne vulgaris treatment?

Throughout our lives, we encounter a multitude of microbes, but only a limited number of them become integral components of the specialized ecosystem that makes up our bodies. In particular, members of the skin microbiota play a key role in maintaining homeostasis and ensuring optimal skin function. Changes in its composition and the specific species present are often associated with the onset of various disease states. A prime example of this phenomenon is acne vulgaris, where the skin microbiota, in particularly the role of C. acnes, has long been suspected.1

The recent systematic review by Podwojniak et al.2 sought to critically evaluate this question through a systematic review, to summarize the related knowledge published to date, and to raise awareness of the possibility of targeted and systematic microbiota modulation as a potential therapeutic approach to treat this condition.

The authors conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and SCOPUS databases, selecting 26 high-quality studies for inclusion in their analysis. One of the contributions of this study is its comprehensive review of the key microbial players in acne pathogenesis. They provide data that the majority of available studies indeed confirm that either C. acnes, or certain ribotypes within the species, are associated with the disease compared to healthy skin.3 This reinforces the notion of a pathogenic role for C. acnes, despite the fact that the bacterium also plays an important role as a member of the healthy skin microflora.4

In diseases where the microbiota changes are important factors, dysbiosis is frequently linked to changes in alpha diversity, which quantifies the species richness in a particular sample. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the variation of alpha diversity with the development of acne lesions, thus it is evident that systematic, large, well-controlled studies are imperative for the advancement of this field in the near future.

Available therapeutic modalities employed in the treatment of acne principally target the inflammatory processes associated with lesion development, the microbial component and sebum production.5 The latter, in turn, exerts an indirect influence on lipophilic microbes by modulating sebum levels. This article summarizes acne treatments that are known to affect the cutaneous microbiome, and summarizes their findings. While the analysis indicated that only benzoyl peroxide exhibited a substantial impact on microbiota composition, this may be attributable to the limited amount of data available for other treatments currently in use. However, given the established efficacy of this molecule in the treatment of acne, these results substantiate the notion that modifying the composition of the microbiota constitutes a promising approach in the management of this condition.

The authors' exploration of novel treatments, including topical probiotics and plant derivatives, underscores the potential for future research in this area. These approaches may offer a means to directly modulate dysbiosis and, consequently, inflammation, while preserving microbial diversity and maintaining a healthy skin microbiome. However, it is important to acknowledge the numerous challenges that currently impede progress in this domain. The long-term implications of modifying the skin microbiome remain to be fully elucidated, and the potential for unintended consequences on skin health and immunity is a salient concern. The heterogeneity of study types, sampling techniques and microbiome classifications poses a significant challenge to the generalizability of findings, underscoring the pressing need for standardized methodologies in microbiome research. Consequently, future studies should prioritize the enrolment of larger, more uniform cohorts and the implementation of consistent analytical approaches. The proposed personalized approaches in microbiome modulation is also particularly interesting. The development of specialized diagnostic tools to assess an individual's cutaneous microbiome and its alterations is crucial for informed treatment decisions.

None.

None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信