{"title":"不同残基牙形态下粘接剂固位和义齿重量的比较分析:一项交叉随机对照试验","authors":"Naseer Ahmed, Maria Shakoor Abbasi, Asra Salahuddin, Lareb Tariq, Sarrah Siraj, Gotam Das, Ghazala Suleman, Fahim Vohra, Artak Heboyan","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of various forms of denture adhesives (paste, powder, and strips) on different types of mandibular residual alveolar ridges, considering their respective denture weights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this crossover randomized-controlled trial, the patients were randomly and equally divided into 3 groups based on clinical features and radiographic findings according to the Wical–Swoope classification. Three forms of denture adhesives were used, including powder, cream, and strips, for three residual ridge types. Quantification of retention without adhesive was carried out as a control. The retentive strength of adhesives was compared in each ridge pattern and correlated with the denture weight. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT05063422).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean retentive strengths of dentures without adhesive (control) were relatively low across all ridge classifications, ranging from 0.27 to 0.69 lb. In contrast, the experimental groups utilizing Fittydent and Polygrip adhesive products showed significantly improved retentive strengths, with Fittydent cream and Polygrip cream showed the highest enhancement, ranging from 1.01 to 2.57 lb across different ridge types. Furthermore, significant mean differences were observed between ridge classes and the retentive strength of each adhesive product.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights the crucial role of tailored denture adhesive selection in optimizing retention for denture wearers. Polygrip cream demonstrated superior effectiveness across various ridge classifications compared to Fittydent cream, powder, and strips. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on ridge types and denture weight.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Adhesive Retention and Denture Weight in Different Residual Ridge Morphologies: A Cross-Over Randomized-Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Naseer Ahmed, Maria Shakoor Abbasi, Asra Salahuddin, Lareb Tariq, Sarrah Siraj, Gotam Das, Ghazala Suleman, Fahim Vohra, Artak Heboyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of various forms of denture adhesives (paste, powder, and strips) on different types of mandibular residual alveolar ridges, considering their respective denture weights.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this crossover randomized-controlled trial, the patients were randomly and equally divided into 3 groups based on clinical features and radiographic findings according to the Wical–Swoope classification. Three forms of denture adhesives were used, including powder, cream, and strips, for three residual ridge types. Quantification of retention without adhesive was carried out as a control. The retentive strength of adhesives was compared in each ridge pattern and correlated with the denture weight. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT05063422).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mean retentive strengths of dentures without adhesive (control) were relatively low across all ridge classifications, ranging from 0.27 to 0.69 lb. In contrast, the experimental groups utilizing Fittydent and Polygrip adhesive products showed significantly improved retentive strengths, with Fittydent cream and Polygrip cream showed the highest enhancement, ranging from 1.01 to 2.57 lb across different ridge types. Furthermore, significant mean differences were observed between ridge classes and the retentive strength of each adhesive product.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study highlights the crucial role of tailored denture adhesive selection in optimizing retention for denture wearers. Polygrip cream demonstrated superior effectiveness across various ridge classifications compared to Fittydent cream, powder, and strips. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on ridge types and denture weight.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Adhesive Retention and Denture Weight in Different Residual Ridge Morphologies: A Cross-Over Randomized-Controlled Trial
Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of various forms of denture adhesives (paste, powder, and strips) on different types of mandibular residual alveolar ridges, considering their respective denture weights.
Materials and Methods
In this crossover randomized-controlled trial, the patients were randomly and equally divided into 3 groups based on clinical features and radiographic findings according to the Wical–Swoope classification. Three forms of denture adhesives were used, including powder, cream, and strips, for three residual ridge types. Quantification of retention without adhesive was carried out as a control. The retentive strength of adhesives was compared in each ridge pattern and correlated with the denture weight. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT05063422).
Results
The mean retentive strengths of dentures without adhesive (control) were relatively low across all ridge classifications, ranging from 0.27 to 0.69 lb. In contrast, the experimental groups utilizing Fittydent and Polygrip adhesive products showed significantly improved retentive strengths, with Fittydent cream and Polygrip cream showed the highest enhancement, ranging from 1.01 to 2.57 lb across different ridge types. Furthermore, significant mean differences were observed between ridge classes and the retentive strength of each adhesive product.
Conclusion
The study highlights the crucial role of tailored denture adhesive selection in optimizing retention for denture wearers. Polygrip cream demonstrated superior effectiveness across various ridge classifications compared to Fittydent cream, powder, and strips. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on ridge types and denture weight.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.