Dongsheng Zhao, Yan Dong, Qiushi Chen, Fengxiang Zhang, Koulong Zheng
{"title":"阵发性心房颤动触发因素的分布规律与导管消融成功率","authors":"Dongsheng Zhao, Yan Dong, Qiushi Chen, Fengxiang Zhang, Koulong Zheng","doi":"10.1111/anec.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Investigate the distribution of triggers in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients and assess the efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein isolationI (CPVI) combined with non-pulmonary veins (PV) trigger ablation over 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective study included 130 PAF patients undergoing initial catheter ablation. A standardized protocol was applied before CPVI, followed by ablation targeting non-PV triggers. Ablation success was marked by the inability to induce atrial fibrillation (AF) or related arrhythmias. Patients underwent Holter monitoring at intervals post-surgery, culminating in a 7-day exam at 12 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced in 88 patients (67.0%), with 94 foci identified. The left pulmonary vein was a common source, but the superior vena cava emerged as the most prevalent non-PV site. The 1-year success rate was 86.0%, with no significant differences in success rates among trigger types. However, non-PV triggers were linked to lower recurrence rates post-surgery (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that the combination of drug stimulation and high-frequency atrial stimulation before CPVI significantly boosted AF induction rates and revealed a high incidence of non-PV triggers. Effective intraoperative induction and accurate identification of non-PV triggers, particularly in the superior vein cava (SVC), contributed to a substantial reduction in postoperative recurrence rates. This approach suggests a potential strategy for improving outcomes in PAF treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution Patterns of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Triggers and Catheter Ablation Success Rates\",\"authors\":\"Dongsheng Zhao, Yan Dong, Qiushi Chen, Fengxiang Zhang, Koulong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anec.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Investigate the distribution of triggers in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients and assess the efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein isolationI (CPVI) combined with non-pulmonary veins (PV) trigger ablation over 1 year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective study included 130 PAF patients undergoing initial catheter ablation. A standardized protocol was applied before CPVI, followed by ablation targeting non-PV triggers. Ablation success was marked by the inability to induce atrial fibrillation (AF) or related arrhythmias. Patients underwent Holter monitoring at intervals post-surgery, culminating in a 7-day exam at 12 months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced in 88 patients (67.0%), with 94 foci identified. The left pulmonary vein was a common source, but the superior vena cava emerged as the most prevalent non-PV site. The 1-year success rate was 86.0%, with no significant differences in success rates among trigger types. However, non-PV triggers were linked to lower recurrence rates post-surgery (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study found that the combination of drug stimulation and high-frequency atrial stimulation before CPVI significantly boosted AF induction rates and revealed a high incidence of non-PV triggers. Effective intraoperative induction and accurate identification of non-PV triggers, particularly in the superior vein cava (SVC), contributed to a substantial reduction in postoperative recurrence rates. This approach suggests a potential strategy for improving outcomes in PAF treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨阵发性心房颤动(PAF)患者触发因素的分布,评价环肺静脉隔离(CPVI)联合非肺静脉(PV)触发消融治疗1年以上的疗效。方法本前瞻性研究纳入130例首次行导管消融的PAF患者。CPVI前采用标准化方案,随后针对非pv触发因素进行消融。消融成功的标志是不能诱发心房颤动(AF)或相关心律失常。患者术后每隔一段时间进行动态心电图监测,12个月时进行为期7天的检查。结果诱发心房颤动88例(67.0%),确定94个灶。左肺静脉是常见的来源,但上腔静脉是最常见的非pv部位。1年成功率为86.0%,不同触发类型的成功率无显著差异。然而,非pv诱因与术后复发率较低相关(HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.96, p = 0.04)。结论本研究发现,CPVI前联合药物刺激和高频心房刺激可显著提高AF诱导率,非pv诱因发生率较高。术中有效的诱导和准确识别非pv诱因,特别是在上腔静脉(SVC),有助于大幅降低术后复发率。这种方法为改善PAF治疗结果提供了一种潜在的策略。
Distribution Patterns of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Triggers and Catheter Ablation Success Rates
Objective
Investigate the distribution of triggers in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients and assess the efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein isolationI (CPVI) combined with non-pulmonary veins (PV) trigger ablation over 1 year.
Methods
This prospective study included 130 PAF patients undergoing initial catheter ablation. A standardized protocol was applied before CPVI, followed by ablation targeting non-PV triggers. Ablation success was marked by the inability to induce atrial fibrillation (AF) or related arrhythmias. Patients underwent Holter monitoring at intervals post-surgery, culminating in a 7-day exam at 12 months.
Results
Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced in 88 patients (67.0%), with 94 foci identified. The left pulmonary vein was a common source, but the superior vena cava emerged as the most prevalent non-PV site. The 1-year success rate was 86.0%, with no significant differences in success rates among trigger types. However, non-PV triggers were linked to lower recurrence rates post-surgery (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.96, p = 0.04).
Conclusion
The study found that the combination of drug stimulation and high-frequency atrial stimulation before CPVI significantly boosted AF induction rates and revealed a high incidence of non-PV triggers. Effective intraoperative induction and accurate identification of non-PV triggers, particularly in the superior vein cava (SVC), contributed to a substantial reduction in postoperative recurrence rates. This approach suggests a potential strategy for improving outcomes in PAF treatment.
期刊介绍:
The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients.
ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation.
ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.