{"title":"拉施客观测量理论下的患者安全文化量表的开发与心理测量学验证","authors":"Odunayo Kolawole Omolade, John Stephenson","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/9997682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Assessing the culture of patient safety in healthcare settings is pivotal for continuously reinforcing effective, safe and quality patient care. However, most of the rating scales lack evidence of objective validation of the measuring instruments.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the psychometric properties of culture of patient safety scale under the Rasch objective measurement theory.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> The validation of the culture of safety scale was underpinned by the four stages of rating scale development in Rasch objective measurement theory. The first stage involved literature review to shortlist items considered theoretically relevant to culture of patient safety in hospital settings. In the second stage, a panel of academic and practitioners individually reviewed the selected items to give external face validity based on professional experiences. In the third stage, 967 participants from public maternity settings in Nigeria voluntarily accessed the nine items forming the culture of patient safety scale online over 8-week period. Ethical approval was given by the nurses’ association and University of Huddersfield. Subsequently, all the data were exported to SPSS and Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0 for evaluation of the psychometric assumptions. Essential psychometric properties evaluated are dimensionality, category functioning, item difficulty/agreeability, local independence, reliability and item validity. In the fourth stage, problematic items were identified and moderated based on the outcome of the measurement assumptions. Consequently, final decisions made included retention, modification or expulsion of items, making no meaningful contribution to the variable measurement.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion and Implication:</b> The culture of safety scale has excellent psychometric properties and therefore recommended for use among practitioners and researchers. No direct contribution from the public or patients required in this study.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/9997682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development and Psychometric Validation of Culture of Patient Safety Scale Under Rasch Objective Measurement Theory\",\"authors\":\"Odunayo Kolawole Omolade, John Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/9997682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Assessing the culture of patient safety in healthcare settings is pivotal for continuously reinforcing effective, safe and quality patient care. However, most of the rating scales lack evidence of objective validation of the measuring instruments.</p>\\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the psychometric properties of culture of patient safety scale under the Rasch objective measurement theory.</p>\\n <p><b>Method:</b> The validation of the culture of safety scale was underpinned by the four stages of rating scale development in Rasch objective measurement theory. The first stage involved literature review to shortlist items considered theoretically relevant to culture of patient safety in hospital settings. In the second stage, a panel of academic and practitioners individually reviewed the selected items to give external face validity based on professional experiences. In the third stage, 967 participants from public maternity settings in Nigeria voluntarily accessed the nine items forming the culture of patient safety scale online over 8-week period. Ethical approval was given by the nurses’ association and University of Huddersfield. Subsequently, all the data were exported to SPSS and Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0 for evaluation of the psychometric assumptions. Essential psychometric properties evaluated are dimensionality, category functioning, item difficulty/agreeability, local independence, reliability and item validity. In the fourth stage, problematic items were identified and moderated based on the outcome of the measurement assumptions. Consequently, final decisions made included retention, modification or expulsion of items, making no meaningful contribution to the variable measurement.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion and Implication:</b> The culture of safety scale has excellent psychometric properties and therefore recommended for use among practitioners and researchers. No direct contribution from the public or patients required in this study.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/9997682\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/9997682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/9997682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:评估医疗环境中的患者安全文化对于持续加强有效、安全和高质量的患者护理至关重要。然而,大多数评定量表缺乏测量仪器客观验证的证据。目的:探讨Rasch客观测量理论下患者安全量表培养的心理测量特性。方法:以Rasch客观测量理论中评定量表开发的四个阶段为基础,对安全量表的培养进行验证。第一阶段涉及文献综述,以列出被认为在理论上与医院环境中患者安全文化相关的项目。在第二阶段,一个由学者和从业者组成的小组根据专业经验对所选项目进行单独审查,以给出外部面孔效度。在第三阶段,来自尼日利亚公立产科机构的967名参与者在8周的时间里自愿在线访问了构成患者安全文化量表的9个项目。护士协会和哈德斯菲尔德大学给予了道德上的认可。随后,将所有数据导出到SPSS和Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0中进行心理测量假设的评估。评估的基本心理测量属性包括维度、类别功能、项目难度/适应性、局部独立性、信度和项目效度。在第四阶段,根据测量假设的结果识别和调节有问题的项目。因此,最终做出的决定包括保留、修改或删除项目,对变量测量没有任何有意义的贡献。结论与意义:安全培养量表具有良好的心理测量特性,推荐在从业人员和研究人员中使用。本研究不需要公众或患者的直接资助。
The Development and Psychometric Validation of Culture of Patient Safety Scale Under Rasch Objective Measurement Theory
Background: Assessing the culture of patient safety in healthcare settings is pivotal for continuously reinforcing effective, safe and quality patient care. However, most of the rating scales lack evidence of objective validation of the measuring instruments.
Aim: To determine the psychometric properties of culture of patient safety scale under the Rasch objective measurement theory.
Method: The validation of the culture of safety scale was underpinned by the four stages of rating scale development in Rasch objective measurement theory. The first stage involved literature review to shortlist items considered theoretically relevant to culture of patient safety in hospital settings. In the second stage, a panel of academic and practitioners individually reviewed the selected items to give external face validity based on professional experiences. In the third stage, 967 participants from public maternity settings in Nigeria voluntarily accessed the nine items forming the culture of patient safety scale online over 8-week period. Ethical approval was given by the nurses’ association and University of Huddersfield. Subsequently, all the data were exported to SPSS and Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0 for evaluation of the psychometric assumptions. Essential psychometric properties evaluated are dimensionality, category functioning, item difficulty/agreeability, local independence, reliability and item validity. In the fourth stage, problematic items were identified and moderated based on the outcome of the measurement assumptions. Consequently, final decisions made included retention, modification or expulsion of items, making no meaningful contribution to the variable measurement.
Conclusion and Implication: The culture of safety scale has excellent psychometric properties and therefore recommended for use among practitioners and researchers. No direct contribution from the public or patients required in this study.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.