单腕关节多普勒超声评分对类风湿关节炎活动性的诊断价值研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zijing Chu, Zhixing Zhou, Muhammad Asad Iqbal, Zhongxin Zhang, Xian Wang
{"title":"单腕关节多普勒超声评分对类风湿关节炎活动性的诊断价值研究","authors":"Zijing Chu,&nbsp;Zhixing Zhou,&nbsp;Muhammad Asad Iqbal,&nbsp;Zhongxin Zhang,&nbsp;Xian Wang","doi":"10.1111/1756-185X.70185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a generalized, chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple joints, characterized by joint swelling, tenderness, tendonitis, tenosynovitis, bone destruction, and it usually affects the surrounding joints, mainly including the small joints of the hands and feet [<span>1</span>]. The 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis recommend the clinical use of 28 disease activity scores in 28 joints (DAS28) to evaluate patients' mobility [<span>2</span>]. Ultrasound, on the other hand, is more sensitive and reproducible than clinical assessment of joint inflammation [<span>3</span>]. Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) can capture the changes in blood flow signals, and on the basis of gray scale ultrasound (GSUS), determine whether there is inflammation at the hyperplasia site, and can diagnose RA more accurately and early through the joint examination of the wrist joint by GSUS and PDUS [<span>4</span>]. Nowadays, many studies at home and abroad use multi-joint ultrasound scores to diagnose and assess RA mobility, but the establishment of single-wrist ultrasound score as a standard for evaluating RA mobility is rarely reported. This study was approved by the Research Institution Review Committee of the First People's Hospital of Nantong, and the subjects voluntarily participated in the clinical study and signed the informed consent form.</p><p>RA patients who were admitted to the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Nantong First People's Hospital from 2021 to 2022 were randomly selected, a total of 100 RA patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on disease activity: low/medium mobility and high mobility. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed by using the French acoustic AIXPLORER ultrasound instrument and probe SL15-6 (frequency 6 ~ 15 MHz). Scan the mid-wrist, radial, and ulnar wrist of both wrist joints for diagnosis of synovitis, and scan the volar wrist flexor carpi radialis tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, and dorsal carpal 1st to 6th chamber tendon for tendonization/tenosynovitis. Scan of the single wrist joint with an overall score, bone erosion, and joint effusion. The operator took pictures of all the scanned parts, and two sonographers with 5 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis could not obtain other clinical indicators of the patient, and the semi-quantitative score of the more severe lateral wrist joint under ultrasound conditions was completed. Synovitis (S) and tendon/tenosynovitis (T) were assessed with gray-scale score (GS) and energy Doppler score (PD), respectively, and bone erosion and joint effusion were assessed with GS. The Verio 3.0T high-field magnetic resonance imaging instrument of Siemens was used to perform MR noncontrast scan + enhanced examination on the wrist joint. The wrist with the higher VAS score was scanned by the VAS score [<span>1</span>]. The MR non-contrast scanning sequence selected the coronal turbo spin echo (TSE) and fat suppression (FS). TI-TSE sequence: repetition time (TR) 500 ms; echo time (TE) 24 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; Field of view (FOV): 180 mm × 180 mm. T2-de3d sequence: TR 12.79 ms; TE 4.57 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Axial Pd-FS sequence: TR 2500 ms; TE 9.8 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; FOV 120 mm × 120 mm [<span>2</span>]. MR enhancement was injected with a dose of 0.2 mL/kg and a flow rate of 2.0 mL/s Gadolinium glumethylamine acetate (Gd-DTPA), and the injection site was the elbow vein, and the coronal T1-vibe-FS image was obtained. T1-vibe-FS sequence: TR 14.7 ms; TE 6.06 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Two radiologists with 5 years of experience in RA osteoarthritic imaging will perform a semi-quantitative score of the patient's magnetic resonance images, and if there is a disagreement, the agreement will be completed. Scored according to the RAMRIS system criteria [<span>5</span>], synovitis scores for the distal ulnar-radial, radial wrist, and interosseous-metacarpophalangeal joints of the wrist; Bone marrow edema and bone erosion scores were performed on the distal ulna, distal radius, base of metacarpal bone, and carpal bone, and the scores were added to obtain RAMRIS. The RA uni-wrist ultrasound score, unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score, and RAMRIS were consistent among the two observers, and the ICC values were 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><p>In our study, including 47 in the high activity group (DAS 28 &gt; 5.1) and 53 in the low and intermediate activity group (DAS-28 ≤ 5.1). The incidence of RA synovitis was 58 cases, and the incidence rate was 58%, among which the midline of the wrist was the most common (45/100, 45%), and the radial side of the wrist (30/100, 30%) and the ulnar side of the wrist (29/100, 20%) were the most common incidences. There were 48 cases of tendon/tenosynovitis, with an incidence rate of 48%, among which the extensor tendon of the carpi radialis was the most common (16/100, 16%), followed by the flexor tendon of the third finger (15/100, 15%) and the flexor tendon of the second finger (14/100, 14%). There were 7 cases of bone erosion, with an incidence rate of 7%; There were 2 cases of joint effusion, with an incidence rate of 2%. There were statistically significant differences between the synovitis scores, mid-wrist synovitis, wrist radial synovitis, wrist ulnar synovitis, tendon/tenosynovitis scores, 3rd finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, 4th finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, extensor carpi radialis breviferum tendon and extensor carpi radialis longus tenosynovitis, and total ultrasound scores, as shown in Table 1. The ultrasound performance of the RA high activity group is shown in Figure 1. The RA patient had a CRP of 55.77 mg/L, an ESR of 53 mm/h, five painful joints, five swollen joints, a DAS28 score of 5.5, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone erosion in the ultrasound image of the patient, and a single-wrist ultrasound score of 14. The synovium and tendon of the wrist joint of RA patients were examined by GSUS, PDUS, and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively, and the differences of S, T, GS, PD, total ultrasound score, synovitis score (RAMRIS), bone marrow edema score (RAMRIS), bone erosion score (RAMRIS) and RAMRIS between the two groups were statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The total ultrasound score, S score, T score, GS score, and PD score of RA were positively correlated with DAS28, and the correlation was statistically significant (rho = 0.447, 0.404, 0.221, 0.391, 0.461, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Within the ultrasound scores, the S score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.564, 0.822), the T score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.816, 0.550), and the GS score was positively correlated with the PD score (rho = 0.783), and the correlation was statistically significant. The DAS28 score of RA was positively correlated with wrist RAMRIS (rho = 482, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the unilateral wrist ultrasound score and the unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score to determine different RA mobility and 95% CI were 0.814 (0.724–0.903) and 0.842 (0.762–0.921), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i> = 0.396). The single wrist joint ultrasound score and RAMRIS areas under the ROC curve were 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i> = 0.513).</p><p>RA is characterized by persistent synovitis [<span>6</span>], Synovial inflammation can be used as an indicator or predictor of systemic inflammatory response [<span>7</span>]. In this study, it was found that the incidence of synovitis is higher than that of tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion, and the incidence of tendon/tenosynovitis is lower in the low- to medium-active group (37%). This suggests that the use of ultrasound to assess synovial inflammation and assess disease activity is of important clinical value. In this study, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound scores and RAMRIS in assessing the mobility of RA patients was compared, and the area under the ROC curve of single wrist ultrasound score and RAMRIS was 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and the diagnostic performance of RAMRIS was higher, and there was no significant difference between the two. Although the diagnostic power of the two scores is similar, the composition of the scores is different; the wrist ultrasound score is composed of synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion and is quantitatively counted for tendon/tenosynovitis, while RAMRIS is the sum of synovitis, bone erosion, and bone marrow edema scores, and only qualitative statistics are used for tendon/tenosynovitis. On the one hand, ultrasound is cheap, real-time, and convenient, while magnetic resonance is expensive and less available. On the other hand, bone marrow edema is a reliable predictor of arthritic disease progression [<span>8</span>], bone marrow edema cannot be detected by ultrasound, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive in assessing joint inflammation and can detect bone marrow edema [<span>9</span>]. Due to the difference in imaging ability between the two and the different focus of detection, ultrasound cannot be used to completely replace MRI, so the two can be combined, and their respective advantages can be used to diagnose ultrasound and magnetic resonance when conditions permit, so as to obtain better disease evaluation results. In this study, we also compared the single wrist score, unilateral hand, and wrist scores, and there was no significant difference between them, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.814 and 0.842, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.396), which further confirmed the possibility of reducing the hand joint score, shortening the examination time without reducing the diagnostic rate of mobility. DAS28 can be affected by external factors such as environment and psychology, and while DAS28 does not include imaging assessments, ultrasound provides a visual picture of disease progression and is more meaningful than laboratory results. Patients with RA often undergo ultrasound of both hands and wrists, and the vast majority of RA ultrasound scores are multi-articular; for example, Nam J et al. successfully predicted the progression of RA using a US32-joint protocol [<span>10</span>]. In this study, considering the cumbersomeness of US examination of multiple joints, we performed US examination of both wrists and selected unilateral wrist joints with more severe US images for scoring, which simplified the ultrasound scoring and saved the time and cost of examination of PIP and MCP in both hands. Disease activity can be assessed more rapidly, and screening for active RA can be facilitated.</p><p>Our study also has certain limitations. First, the sample size of this study is small, and there may be selection bias. Secondly, there is a lack of a healthy control group in this study. Thirdly, other joint scores were not included in this study. Fourth, pathological results were not used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different methods.</p><p>In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the ultrasound score of a single wrist joint is closely related to rheumatoid arthritis activity and has diagnostic potential for RA activity.</p><p>Zijing Chu, Zhixing Zhou, Muhammad Asad Iqbal contributed to the conception and design of the study. Zhongxin Zhang, Xian Wang wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1756-185X.70185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasound Score in a Single Wrist Joint to Assess the Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"Zijing Chu,&nbsp;Zhixing Zhou,&nbsp;Muhammad Asad Iqbal,&nbsp;Zhongxin Zhang,&nbsp;Xian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-185X.70185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a generalized, chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple joints, characterized by joint swelling, tenderness, tendonitis, tenosynovitis, bone destruction, and it usually affects the surrounding joints, mainly including the small joints of the hands and feet [<span>1</span>]. The 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis recommend the clinical use of 28 disease activity scores in 28 joints (DAS28) to evaluate patients' mobility [<span>2</span>]. Ultrasound, on the other hand, is more sensitive and reproducible than clinical assessment of joint inflammation [<span>3</span>]. Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) can capture the changes in blood flow signals, and on the basis of gray scale ultrasound (GSUS), determine whether there is inflammation at the hyperplasia site, and can diagnose RA more accurately and early through the joint examination of the wrist joint by GSUS and PDUS [<span>4</span>]. Nowadays, many studies at home and abroad use multi-joint ultrasound scores to diagnose and assess RA mobility, but the establishment of single-wrist ultrasound score as a standard for evaluating RA mobility is rarely reported. This study was approved by the Research Institution Review Committee of the First People's Hospital of Nantong, and the subjects voluntarily participated in the clinical study and signed the informed consent form.</p><p>RA patients who were admitted to the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Nantong First People's Hospital from 2021 to 2022 were randomly selected, a total of 100 RA patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on disease activity: low/medium mobility and high mobility. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed by using the French acoustic AIXPLORER ultrasound instrument and probe SL15-6 (frequency 6 ~ 15 MHz). Scan the mid-wrist, radial, and ulnar wrist of both wrist joints for diagnosis of synovitis, and scan the volar wrist flexor carpi radialis tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, and dorsal carpal 1st to 6th chamber tendon for tendonization/tenosynovitis. Scan of the single wrist joint with an overall score, bone erosion, and joint effusion. The operator took pictures of all the scanned parts, and two sonographers with 5 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis could not obtain other clinical indicators of the patient, and the semi-quantitative score of the more severe lateral wrist joint under ultrasound conditions was completed. Synovitis (S) and tendon/tenosynovitis (T) were assessed with gray-scale score (GS) and energy Doppler score (PD), respectively, and bone erosion and joint effusion were assessed with GS. The Verio 3.0T high-field magnetic resonance imaging instrument of Siemens was used to perform MR noncontrast scan + enhanced examination on the wrist joint. The wrist with the higher VAS score was scanned by the VAS score [<span>1</span>]. The MR non-contrast scanning sequence selected the coronal turbo spin echo (TSE) and fat suppression (FS). TI-TSE sequence: repetition time (TR) 500 ms; echo time (TE) 24 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; Field of view (FOV): 180 mm × 180 mm. T2-de3d sequence: TR 12.79 ms; TE 4.57 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Axial Pd-FS sequence: TR 2500 ms; TE 9.8 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; FOV 120 mm × 120 mm [<span>2</span>]. MR enhancement was injected with a dose of 0.2 mL/kg and a flow rate of 2.0 mL/s Gadolinium glumethylamine acetate (Gd-DTPA), and the injection site was the elbow vein, and the coronal T1-vibe-FS image was obtained. T1-vibe-FS sequence: TR 14.7 ms; TE 6.06 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Two radiologists with 5 years of experience in RA osteoarthritic imaging will perform a semi-quantitative score of the patient's magnetic resonance images, and if there is a disagreement, the agreement will be completed. Scored according to the RAMRIS system criteria [<span>5</span>], synovitis scores for the distal ulnar-radial, radial wrist, and interosseous-metacarpophalangeal joints of the wrist; Bone marrow edema and bone erosion scores were performed on the distal ulna, distal radius, base of metacarpal bone, and carpal bone, and the scores were added to obtain RAMRIS. The RA uni-wrist ultrasound score, unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score, and RAMRIS were consistent among the two observers, and the ICC values were 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><p>In our study, including 47 in the high activity group (DAS 28 &gt; 5.1) and 53 in the low and intermediate activity group (DAS-28 ≤ 5.1). The incidence of RA synovitis was 58 cases, and the incidence rate was 58%, among which the midline of the wrist was the most common (45/100, 45%), and the radial side of the wrist (30/100, 30%) and the ulnar side of the wrist (29/100, 20%) were the most common incidences. There were 48 cases of tendon/tenosynovitis, with an incidence rate of 48%, among which the extensor tendon of the carpi radialis was the most common (16/100, 16%), followed by the flexor tendon of the third finger (15/100, 15%) and the flexor tendon of the second finger (14/100, 14%). There were 7 cases of bone erosion, with an incidence rate of 7%; There were 2 cases of joint effusion, with an incidence rate of 2%. There were statistically significant differences between the synovitis scores, mid-wrist synovitis, wrist radial synovitis, wrist ulnar synovitis, tendon/tenosynovitis scores, 3rd finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, 4th finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, extensor carpi radialis breviferum tendon and extensor carpi radialis longus tenosynovitis, and total ultrasound scores, as shown in Table 1. The ultrasound performance of the RA high activity group is shown in Figure 1. The RA patient had a CRP of 55.77 mg/L, an ESR of 53 mm/h, five painful joints, five swollen joints, a DAS28 score of 5.5, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone erosion in the ultrasound image of the patient, and a single-wrist ultrasound score of 14. The synovium and tendon of the wrist joint of RA patients were examined by GSUS, PDUS, and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively, and the differences of S, T, GS, PD, total ultrasound score, synovitis score (RAMRIS), bone marrow edema score (RAMRIS), bone erosion score (RAMRIS) and RAMRIS between the two groups were statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The total ultrasound score, S score, T score, GS score, and PD score of RA were positively correlated with DAS28, and the correlation was statistically significant (rho = 0.447, 0.404, 0.221, 0.391, 0.461, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Within the ultrasound scores, the S score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.564, 0.822), the T score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.816, 0.550), and the GS score was positively correlated with the PD score (rho = 0.783), and the correlation was statistically significant. The DAS28 score of RA was positively correlated with wrist RAMRIS (rho = 482, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the unilateral wrist ultrasound score and the unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score to determine different RA mobility and 95% CI were 0.814 (0.724–0.903) and 0.842 (0.762–0.921), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i> = 0.396). The single wrist joint ultrasound score and RAMRIS areas under the ROC curve were 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i> = 0.513).</p><p>RA is characterized by persistent synovitis [<span>6</span>], Synovial inflammation can be used as an indicator or predictor of systemic inflammatory response [<span>7</span>]. In this study, it was found that the incidence of synovitis is higher than that of tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion, and the incidence of tendon/tenosynovitis is lower in the low- to medium-active group (37%). This suggests that the use of ultrasound to assess synovial inflammation and assess disease activity is of important clinical value. In this study, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound scores and RAMRIS in assessing the mobility of RA patients was compared, and the area under the ROC curve of single wrist ultrasound score and RAMRIS was 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and the diagnostic performance of RAMRIS was higher, and there was no significant difference between the two. Although the diagnostic power of the two scores is similar, the composition of the scores is different; the wrist ultrasound score is composed of synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion and is quantitatively counted for tendon/tenosynovitis, while RAMRIS is the sum of synovitis, bone erosion, and bone marrow edema scores, and only qualitative statistics are used for tendon/tenosynovitis. On the one hand, ultrasound is cheap, real-time, and convenient, while magnetic resonance is expensive and less available. On the other hand, bone marrow edema is a reliable predictor of arthritic disease progression [<span>8</span>], bone marrow edema cannot be detected by ultrasound, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive in assessing joint inflammation and can detect bone marrow edema [<span>9</span>]. Due to the difference in imaging ability between the two and the different focus of detection, ultrasound cannot be used to completely replace MRI, so the two can be combined, and their respective advantages can be used to diagnose ultrasound and magnetic resonance when conditions permit, so as to obtain better disease evaluation results. In this study, we also compared the single wrist score, unilateral hand, and wrist scores, and there was no significant difference between them, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.814 and 0.842, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.396), which further confirmed the possibility of reducing the hand joint score, shortening the examination time without reducing the diagnostic rate of mobility. DAS28 can be affected by external factors such as environment and psychology, and while DAS28 does not include imaging assessments, ultrasound provides a visual picture of disease progression and is more meaningful than laboratory results. Patients with RA often undergo ultrasound of both hands and wrists, and the vast majority of RA ultrasound scores are multi-articular; for example, Nam J et al. successfully predicted the progression of RA using a US32-joint protocol [<span>10</span>]. In this study, considering the cumbersomeness of US examination of multiple joints, we performed US examination of both wrists and selected unilateral wrist joints with more severe US images for scoring, which simplified the ultrasound scoring and saved the time and cost of examination of PIP and MCP in both hands. Disease activity can be assessed more rapidly, and screening for active RA can be facilitated.</p><p>Our study also has certain limitations. First, the sample size of this study is small, and there may be selection bias. Secondly, there is a lack of a healthy control group in this study. Thirdly, other joint scores were not included in this study. Fourth, pathological results were not used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different methods.</p><p>In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the ultrasound score of a single wrist joint is closely related to rheumatoid arthritis activity and has diagnostic potential for RA activity.</p><p>Zijing Chu, Zhixing Zhou, Muhammad Asad Iqbal contributed to the conception and design of the study. Zhongxin Zhang, Xian Wang wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1756-185X.70185\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.70185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.70185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种累及多个关节的全身性慢性炎症性疾病,以关节肿胀、压痛、肌腱炎、腱鞘炎、骨质破坏为特征,通常累及周围关节,主要包括手脚的小关节[1]。《2018年中国类风湿性关节炎诊疗指南》推荐临床使用28个关节的28个疾病活动度评分(DAS28)来评估患者的活动能力。另一方面,超声对关节炎症的评估比临床评估更加敏感和可重复性。功率多普勒超声(Power Doppler ultrasound, PDUS)可以捕捉血流信号的变化,在灰度超声(gray - scale ultrasound, GSUS)的基础上判断增生部位是否存在炎症,通过GSUS和PDUS[4]对腕关节进行关节检查,可以更准确、更早地诊断RA。目前,国内外许多研究采用多关节超声评分来诊断和评估RA的活动度,但建立单腕超声评分作为评估RA活动度的标准却鲜有报道。本研究经南通市第一人民医院科研机构审查委员会批准,受试者自愿参加临床研究并签署知情同意书。随机选取2021 - 2022年南通市第一人民医院风湿病免疫科收治的RA患者,共纳入100例RA患者,根据疾病活动度分为低/中活动度组和高活动度组。采用法国声学AIXPLORER超声仪,探头SL15-6(频率6 ~ 15 MHz)进行肌肉骨骼超声检查。扫描双腕关节腕中、桡腕、尺腕诊断滑膜炎,扫描掌侧腕桡侧腕屈肌腱、拇长屈肌腱、拇长屈肌腱、腕背1 ~ 6房腱,检查腱化/腱鞘炎。单腕关节扫描,总体评分、骨侵蚀和关节积液。操作者对所有扫描部位拍照,两名具有5年肌肉骨骼影像学诊断经验的超声医师无法获得患者的其他临床指标,完成超声条件下较为严重的腕外侧关节半定量评分。分别用灰度评分(GS)和能量多普勒评分(PD)评估滑膜炎(S)和肌腱/腱鞘炎(T),用GS评分评估骨侵蚀和关节积液。采用西门子Verio 3.0T高场磁共振成像仪对腕关节进行MR非对比扫描+增强检查。采用VAS评分[1]对VAS评分较高的腕关节进行扫描。磁共振非对比扫描序列选择冠状涡旋回波(TSE)和脂肪抑制(FS)。TI-TSE序列:重复时间(TR) 500 ms;回波时间(TE) 24 ms;层厚2mm;层间距2mm;视场(FOV): 180mm × 180mm。T2-de3d序列:TR 12.79 ms;TE 4.57 ms;层厚0.5 mm;层间距0 mm;视场180mm × 180mm。轴向Pd-FS序列:TR 2500 ms;TE 9.8 ms;层厚2mm;层间距2mm;FOV 120mm × 120mm[2]。MR增强注射剂量为0.2 mL/kg,流速为2.0 mL/s,注射部位为手肘静脉,获得冠状t1 -vib - fs图像。T1-vibe-FS序列:TR 14.7 ms;TE 6.06 ms;层厚0.5 mm;层间距0 mm;视场180mm × 180mm。两名具有5年RA骨关节炎成像经验的放射科医生将对患者的磁共振图像进行半定量评分,如果存在分歧,将完成协议。根据RAMRIS系统标准[5]评分,腕关节尺桡远端、桡腕关节和骨间掌指关节的滑膜炎评分;对远端尺骨、远端桡骨、掌骨基部和腕骨进行骨髓水肿和骨侵蚀评分,并将评分加起来,得到RAMRIS。两组RA单腕超声评分、单侧手腕超声评分、RAMRIS均一致,ICC值分别为0.8、0.8、0.7 (p &lt; 0.001)。在我们的研究中,高活性组47例(DAS 28 &gt; 5.1),中低活性组53例(DAS-28≤5.1)。RA滑膜炎的发生率为58例,发生率为58%,其中以腕中线最常见(45/ 100,45%),腕桡侧(30/ 100,30%)和腕尺侧(29/ 100,20%)最常见。 肌腱/腱鞘炎48例,发病率为48%,其中桡腕伸肌腱最常见(16/ 100,16%),其次是中指屈肌腱(15/ 100,15%)和中指屈肌腱(14/ 100,14%)。骨侵蚀7例,发生率为7%;关节积液2例,发生率为2%。滑膜炎评分、腕中滑膜炎、腕桡骨滑膜炎、腕尺滑膜炎、肌腱/腱鞘炎评分、第三指屈肌腱腱鞘炎、第四指屈肌腱腱鞘炎、桡短腕伸肌肌腱和桡长腕伸肌腱鞘炎及超声总评分差异有统计学意义,见表1。RA高活性组超声表现如图1所示。RA患者CRP为55.77 mg/L, ESR为53 mm/h, 5个关节疼痛,5个关节肿胀,DAS28评分5.5,患者超声图像显示滑膜炎、腱鞘炎、骨质侵蚀,单腕超声评分14。对RA患者的腕关节滑膜、肌腱分别进行GSUS、PDUS、磁共振成像检查,两组间S、T、GS、PD、超声总评分、滑膜炎评分(RAMRIS)、骨髓水肿评分(RAMRIS)、骨侵蚀评分(RAMRIS)、RAMRIS差异均有统计学意义(p &lt; 0.05)。RA的总超声评分、S评分、T评分、GS评分、PD评分与DAS28呈正相关,相关性均有统计学意义(rho = 0.447、0.404、0.221、0.391、0.461,p &lt; 0.05)。超声评分中,S评分与GS评分、PD评分呈正相关(rho = 0.564, 0.822), T评分与GS评分、PD评分呈正相关(rho = 0.816, 0.550), GS评分与PD评分呈正相关(rho = 0.783),相关性均有统计学意义。RA的DAS28评分与腕部RAMRIS呈正相关(rho = 482, p &lt; 0.001)。单侧腕关节超声评分和单侧手腕关节超声评分判断不同RA活动度的ROC曲线下面积及95% CI分别为0.814(0.724-0.903)、0.842(0.762-0.921),两者之间无显著差异(p = 0.396)。单腕关节超声评分和ROC曲线下RAMRIS面积分别为0.814和0.852,两者差异无统计学意义(p = 0.513)。RA以持续滑膜炎[6]为特征,滑膜炎症可作为全身性炎症反应[7]的指标或预测指标。本研究发现,滑膜炎的发生率高于腱鞘炎、骨侵蚀和关节积液的发生率,而中低活动组肌腱/腱鞘炎的发生率较低(37%)。这表明使用超声评估滑膜炎症和评估疾病活动性具有重要的临床价值。本研究比较了超声评分和RAMRIS在评估RA患者活动能力方面的诊断性能,单腕超声评分和RAMRIS的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.814和0.852,RAMRIS的诊断性能更高,两者之间无显著差异。虽然两种评分的诊断能力相似,但评分的构成不同;腕关节超声评分由滑膜炎、腱鞘炎、骨侵蚀和关节积液组成,对肌腱/腱鞘炎进行定量统计,RAMRIS评分为滑膜炎、骨侵蚀和骨髓水肿评分之和,对肌腱/腱鞘炎仅进行定性统计。一方面,超声波便宜、实时、方便,而磁共振昂贵且不易获得。另一方面,骨髓水肿是关节炎疾病进展[8]的可靠预测指标,骨髓水肿不能通过超声检测到,而磁共振成像在评估关节炎症方面很敏感,可以检测到骨髓水肿[8]。由于两者成像能力不同,检测重点不同,超声不能完全取代MRI,因此可以将两者结合起来,在条件允许的情况下,利用其各自的优势对超声和磁共振进行诊断,从而获得更好的疾病评价结果。在本研究中,我们还比较了单手腕评分、单侧手评分和手腕评分,三者之间无显著差异,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.814和0.842 (p = 0。 396),进一步证实了在不降低活动度诊断率的情况下,降低手部关节评分,缩短检查时间的可能性。DAS28可受外部因素如环境和心理的影响,而DAS28不包括影像学评估,超声提供疾病进展的视觉图像,比实验室结果更有意义。RA患者常进行双手和手腕超声检查,绝大多数RA超声评分为多关节;例如,Nam J等人使用us32联合协议[10]成功预测了RA的进展。本研究中,考虑到多关节超声检查的繁琐,我们对双腕进行超声检查,选择超声图像较严重的单侧腕关节进行评分,简化了超声评分,节省了双手PIP和MCP检查的时间和费用。可以更快速地评估疾病活动性,并促进对活动性类风湿性关节炎的筛查。我们的研究也有一定的局限性。首先,本研究样本量较小,可能存在选择偏倚。其次,本研究缺少健康对照组。第三,其他关节评分未纳入本研究。第四,不以病理结果作为评价不同方法诊断效果的金标准。总之,我们的研究表明单个腕关节的超声评分与类风湿关节炎活动密切相关,具有类风湿关节炎活动的诊断潜力。褚子静,周志兴,Muhammad Asad Iqbal对研究的构思和设计做出了贡献。张忠信、王贤撰写了部分手稿。所有作者都对文章做出了贡献,并批准了提交的版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Study of the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasound Score in a Single Wrist Joint to Assess the Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Study of the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasound Score in a Single Wrist Joint to Assess the Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a generalized, chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple joints, characterized by joint swelling, tenderness, tendonitis, tenosynovitis, bone destruction, and it usually affects the surrounding joints, mainly including the small joints of the hands and feet [1]. The 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis recommend the clinical use of 28 disease activity scores in 28 joints (DAS28) to evaluate patients' mobility [2]. Ultrasound, on the other hand, is more sensitive and reproducible than clinical assessment of joint inflammation [3]. Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) can capture the changes in blood flow signals, and on the basis of gray scale ultrasound (GSUS), determine whether there is inflammation at the hyperplasia site, and can diagnose RA more accurately and early through the joint examination of the wrist joint by GSUS and PDUS [4]. Nowadays, many studies at home and abroad use multi-joint ultrasound scores to diagnose and assess RA mobility, but the establishment of single-wrist ultrasound score as a standard for evaluating RA mobility is rarely reported. This study was approved by the Research Institution Review Committee of the First People's Hospital of Nantong, and the subjects voluntarily participated in the clinical study and signed the informed consent form.

RA patients who were admitted to the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Nantong First People's Hospital from 2021 to 2022 were randomly selected, a total of 100 RA patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on disease activity: low/medium mobility and high mobility. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed by using the French acoustic AIXPLORER ultrasound instrument and probe SL15-6 (frequency 6 ~ 15 MHz). Scan the mid-wrist, radial, and ulnar wrist of both wrist joints for diagnosis of synovitis, and scan the volar wrist flexor carpi radialis tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, flexor pollicis longus tendon, and dorsal carpal 1st to 6th chamber tendon for tendonization/tenosynovitis. Scan of the single wrist joint with an overall score, bone erosion, and joint effusion. The operator took pictures of all the scanned parts, and two sonographers with 5 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis could not obtain other clinical indicators of the patient, and the semi-quantitative score of the more severe lateral wrist joint under ultrasound conditions was completed. Synovitis (S) and tendon/tenosynovitis (T) were assessed with gray-scale score (GS) and energy Doppler score (PD), respectively, and bone erosion and joint effusion were assessed with GS. The Verio 3.0T high-field magnetic resonance imaging instrument of Siemens was used to perform MR noncontrast scan + enhanced examination on the wrist joint. The wrist with the higher VAS score was scanned by the VAS score [1]. The MR non-contrast scanning sequence selected the coronal turbo spin echo (TSE) and fat suppression (FS). TI-TSE sequence: repetition time (TR) 500 ms; echo time (TE) 24 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; Field of view (FOV): 180 mm × 180 mm. T2-de3d sequence: TR 12.79 ms; TE 4.57 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Axial Pd-FS sequence: TR 2500 ms; TE 9.8 ms; Layer thickness 2 mm; Layer spacing 2 mm; FOV 120 mm × 120 mm [2]. MR enhancement was injected with a dose of 0.2 mL/kg and a flow rate of 2.0 mL/s Gadolinium glumethylamine acetate (Gd-DTPA), and the injection site was the elbow vein, and the coronal T1-vibe-FS image was obtained. T1-vibe-FS sequence: TR 14.7 ms; TE 6.06 ms; Layer thickness 0.5 mm; Layer spacing 0 mm; FOV 180 mm × 180 mm. Two radiologists with 5 years of experience in RA osteoarthritic imaging will perform a semi-quantitative score of the patient's magnetic resonance images, and if there is a disagreement, the agreement will be completed. Scored according to the RAMRIS system criteria [5], synovitis scores for the distal ulnar-radial, radial wrist, and interosseous-metacarpophalangeal joints of the wrist; Bone marrow edema and bone erosion scores were performed on the distal ulna, distal radius, base of metacarpal bone, and carpal bone, and the scores were added to obtain RAMRIS. The RA uni-wrist ultrasound score, unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score, and RAMRIS were consistent among the two observers, and the ICC values were 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7, respectively (p < 0.001).

In our study, including 47 in the high activity group (DAS 28 > 5.1) and 53 in the low and intermediate activity group (DAS-28 ≤ 5.1). The incidence of RA synovitis was 58 cases, and the incidence rate was 58%, among which the midline of the wrist was the most common (45/100, 45%), and the radial side of the wrist (30/100, 30%) and the ulnar side of the wrist (29/100, 20%) were the most common incidences. There were 48 cases of tendon/tenosynovitis, with an incidence rate of 48%, among which the extensor tendon of the carpi radialis was the most common (16/100, 16%), followed by the flexor tendon of the third finger (15/100, 15%) and the flexor tendon of the second finger (14/100, 14%). There were 7 cases of bone erosion, with an incidence rate of 7%; There were 2 cases of joint effusion, with an incidence rate of 2%. There were statistically significant differences between the synovitis scores, mid-wrist synovitis, wrist radial synovitis, wrist ulnar synovitis, tendon/tenosynovitis scores, 3rd finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, 4th finger flexor tendon tenosynovitis, extensor carpi radialis breviferum tendon and extensor carpi radialis longus tenosynovitis, and total ultrasound scores, as shown in Table 1. The ultrasound performance of the RA high activity group is shown in Figure 1. The RA patient had a CRP of 55.77 mg/L, an ESR of 53 mm/h, five painful joints, five swollen joints, a DAS28 score of 5.5, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone erosion in the ultrasound image of the patient, and a single-wrist ultrasound score of 14. The synovium and tendon of the wrist joint of RA patients were examined by GSUS, PDUS, and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively, and the differences of S, T, GS, PD, total ultrasound score, synovitis score (RAMRIS), bone marrow edema score (RAMRIS), bone erosion score (RAMRIS) and RAMRIS between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The total ultrasound score, S score, T score, GS score, and PD score of RA were positively correlated with DAS28, and the correlation was statistically significant (rho = 0.447, 0.404, 0.221, 0.391, 0.461, p < 0.05). Within the ultrasound scores, the S score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.564, 0.822), the T score was positively correlated with the GS score and PD score (rho = 0.816, 0.550), and the GS score was positively correlated with the PD score (rho = 0.783), and the correlation was statistically significant. The DAS28 score of RA was positively correlated with wrist RAMRIS (rho = 482, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the unilateral wrist ultrasound score and the unilateral hand and wrist ultrasound score to determine different RA mobility and 95% CI were 0.814 (0.724–0.903) and 0.842 (0.762–0.921), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (p = 0.396). The single wrist joint ultrasound score and RAMRIS areas under the ROC curve were 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (p = 0.513).

RA is characterized by persistent synovitis [6], Synovial inflammation can be used as an indicator or predictor of systemic inflammatory response [7]. In this study, it was found that the incidence of synovitis is higher than that of tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion, and the incidence of tendon/tenosynovitis is lower in the low- to medium-active group (37%). This suggests that the use of ultrasound to assess synovial inflammation and assess disease activity is of important clinical value. In this study, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound scores and RAMRIS in assessing the mobility of RA patients was compared, and the area under the ROC curve of single wrist ultrasound score and RAMRIS was 0.814 and 0.852, respectively, and the diagnostic performance of RAMRIS was higher, and there was no significant difference between the two. Although the diagnostic power of the two scores is similar, the composition of the scores is different; the wrist ultrasound score is composed of synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone erosion, and joint effusion and is quantitatively counted for tendon/tenosynovitis, while RAMRIS is the sum of synovitis, bone erosion, and bone marrow edema scores, and only qualitative statistics are used for tendon/tenosynovitis. On the one hand, ultrasound is cheap, real-time, and convenient, while magnetic resonance is expensive and less available. On the other hand, bone marrow edema is a reliable predictor of arthritic disease progression [8], bone marrow edema cannot be detected by ultrasound, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive in assessing joint inflammation and can detect bone marrow edema [9]. Due to the difference in imaging ability between the two and the different focus of detection, ultrasound cannot be used to completely replace MRI, so the two can be combined, and their respective advantages can be used to diagnose ultrasound and magnetic resonance when conditions permit, so as to obtain better disease evaluation results. In this study, we also compared the single wrist score, unilateral hand, and wrist scores, and there was no significant difference between them, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.814 and 0.842, respectively (p = 0.396), which further confirmed the possibility of reducing the hand joint score, shortening the examination time without reducing the diagnostic rate of mobility. DAS28 can be affected by external factors such as environment and psychology, and while DAS28 does not include imaging assessments, ultrasound provides a visual picture of disease progression and is more meaningful than laboratory results. Patients with RA often undergo ultrasound of both hands and wrists, and the vast majority of RA ultrasound scores are multi-articular; for example, Nam J et al. successfully predicted the progression of RA using a US32-joint protocol [10]. In this study, considering the cumbersomeness of US examination of multiple joints, we performed US examination of both wrists and selected unilateral wrist joints with more severe US images for scoring, which simplified the ultrasound scoring and saved the time and cost of examination of PIP and MCP in both hands. Disease activity can be assessed more rapidly, and screening for active RA can be facilitated.

Our study also has certain limitations. First, the sample size of this study is small, and there may be selection bias. Secondly, there is a lack of a healthy control group in this study. Thirdly, other joint scores were not included in this study. Fourth, pathological results were not used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different methods.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the ultrasound score of a single wrist joint is closely related to rheumatoid arthritis activity and has diagnostic potential for RA activity.

Zijing Chu, Zhixing Zhou, Muhammad Asad Iqbal contributed to the conception and design of the study. Zhongxin Zhang, Xian Wang wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信