IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Flora Logoz, Lukas Eggenberger, Michèle Schneeberger, Andreas Walther
{"title":"Psychotherapists' Endorsement of Traditional Masculinity Ideologies and Their Assessment of Gender Differences in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders","authors":"Flora Logoz,&nbsp;Lukas Eggenberger,&nbsp;Michèle Schneeberger,&nbsp;Andreas Walther","doi":"10.1002/capr.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Psychotherapists differ in their treatment success depending on the patient's gender, with men being a challenging patient group for many psychotherapists. On the patient's side, traditional masculinity ideologies (TMI) have been linked to atypical symptom presentation in depression, reduced psychotherapy use, poorer therapy engagement and increased risk for psychotherapy dropout. However, the association between therapists' endorsement of TMI and their assessment of gender differences in the treatment of depressive disorders has never been investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 438 therapists (psychological psychotherapists or psychiatrists) from Switzerland, Germany and Austria completed an online questionnaire about their endorsement of TMI and their perceived differences in psychotherapy success in female and male depression patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most therapists reported no difference in their perceived treatment success for depression therapy between men and women (<i>n</i> = 283, 65%). However, the vast majority of the 155 (35%) psychotherapists who reported a difference in treatment success disfavoured men (<i>n</i> = 118, 27%) as compared to women (<i>n</i> = 37, 8%). Psychotherapists who disfavoured men also reported stronger endorsement of TMI as compared to psychotherapists who reported no perceived gender differences in psychotherapy success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results reveal a group of psychotherapists (high in TMI) that perceive men with depression as harder to treat than female patients with depression. Previous findings on therapist effects suggest that this bias has a negative impact on psychotherapy outcomes in male patients. Therefore, it is important that clinicians recognise how their endorsement of TMI may bias their assessment, potentially disadvantaging male patients with depression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 心理治疗师根据患者的性别不同,其治疗的成功率也不同,对于许多心理治疗师来说,男性患者是一个具有挑战性的患者群体。在患者方面,传统男性意识形态(TMI)与抑郁症的非典型症状表现、心理治疗使用率降低、治疗参与度降低以及心理治疗辍学风险增加有关。然而,治疗师对 TMI 的认可与他们对抑郁障碍治疗中性别差异的评估之间的关联却从未被研究过。 方法 共有来自瑞士、德国和奥地利的 438 名治疗师(心理治疗师或精神科医生)填写了一份在线问卷,内容涉及他们对 TMI 的认可度以及他们对女性和男性抑郁症患者心理治疗成功率差异的看法。 结果 大多数治疗师表示,他们认为男女抑郁症治疗的成功率没有差异(n = 283,65%)。然而,在 155 名(35%)报告治疗成功率存在差异的心理治疗师中,绝大多数不看好男性(n = 118,27%),而看好女性(n = 37,8%)。与认为心理治疗成功率没有性别差异的心理治疗师相比,不喜欢男性的心理治疗师也更认可 TMI。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,有一类心理治疗师(TMI 高)认为男性抑郁症患者比女性抑郁症患者更难治疗。之前关于治疗师效应的研究结果表明,这种偏见会对男性患者的心理治疗结果产生负面影响。因此,临床医生必须认识到他们对 TMI 的认可可能会使他们的评估出现偏差,从而可能对男性抑郁症患者造成不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychotherapists' Endorsement of Traditional Masculinity Ideologies and Their Assessment of Gender Differences in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders

Background

Psychotherapists differ in their treatment success depending on the patient's gender, with men being a challenging patient group for many psychotherapists. On the patient's side, traditional masculinity ideologies (TMI) have been linked to atypical symptom presentation in depression, reduced psychotherapy use, poorer therapy engagement and increased risk for psychotherapy dropout. However, the association between therapists' endorsement of TMI and their assessment of gender differences in the treatment of depressive disorders has never been investigated.

Methods

A total of 438 therapists (psychological psychotherapists or psychiatrists) from Switzerland, Germany and Austria completed an online questionnaire about their endorsement of TMI and their perceived differences in psychotherapy success in female and male depression patients.

Results

Most therapists reported no difference in their perceived treatment success for depression therapy between men and women (n = 283, 65%). However, the vast majority of the 155 (35%) psychotherapists who reported a difference in treatment success disfavoured men (n = 118, 27%) as compared to women (n = 37, 8%). Psychotherapists who disfavoured men also reported stronger endorsement of TMI as compared to psychotherapists who reported no perceived gender differences in psychotherapy success.

Conclusion

Our results reveal a group of psychotherapists (high in TMI) that perceive men with depression as harder to treat than female patients with depression. Previous findings on therapist effects suggest that this bias has a negative impact on psychotherapy outcomes in male patients. Therefore, it is important that clinicians recognise how their endorsement of TMI may bias their assessment, potentially disadvantaging male patients with depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信