冰岛西南部雷克雅纳斯半岛裂谷地震速度模型的监测

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Bohuslav Růžek, Jana Doubravová, Josef Horálek
{"title":"冰岛西南部雷克雅纳斯半岛裂谷地震速度模型的监测","authors":"Bohuslav Růžek,&nbsp;Jana Doubravová,&nbsp;Josef Horálek","doi":"10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most methods for processing seismological data require a suitable velocity model characteristic for the given region being defined. This is also the case of the Reykjanes Peninsula in SW Iceland, where the REYKJANET seismic network was built to monitor local seismicity in the rift zone. At present, four previously published 1D velocity models (SIL, BRA, TRY and VOG) can potentially be used, prompting us to determine which one is the best. In order to address this issue, we arranged a contest in which all four 1D models and one additional 3D model (T3D) were entered. Uniform methodology for classifying the models was applied and included an analysis of: (i) post-1ocalization travel-time residuals, (ii) residuals of the P-wave first-motion incidence angle and (iii) model-predicted and measured Rayleigh-wave dispersion. We discovered that no single model was unequivocally the most optimal, as the differences between them proved rather minor. A common shortcoming of all the models is the bias of the P-wave first motion incidence angle residuals, which may be a general problem for methods working with P-wave amplitudes (e.g., moment tensor solutions). The VOG model was selected with a weak preference. Finally, we propose a simple method for modifying any of the 1D models by adding a station-dependent surface layer with a vertical velocity gradient. This way, a pseudo-3D model is generated which is fully competitive with a true 3D model while retaining the simplicity of 1D ray tracing. The efficiency of this correction was demonstrated using the VOG model. The corrected VOG model provides post-1ocalization residuals comparable with the true 3D model T3D, has zero bias in predicting the P-wave first-motion incidence angles, and agrees acceptably in predicting the Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity known from other sources. While calculations with a 3D model can be clumsy, the proposed pseudo-3D model is defined by few parameters and is very easy to use. Its applicability is limited to earthquake sources deeper than the deepest lower limit of the topmost layer below the stations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"69 1","pages":"57 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervision of seismic velocity models of the Reykjanes Peninsula Rift, SW Iceland\",\"authors\":\"Bohuslav Růžek,&nbsp;Jana Doubravová,&nbsp;Josef Horálek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most methods for processing seismological data require a suitable velocity model characteristic for the given region being defined. This is also the case of the Reykjanes Peninsula in SW Iceland, where the REYKJANET seismic network was built to monitor local seismicity in the rift zone. At present, four previously published 1D velocity models (SIL, BRA, TRY and VOG) can potentially be used, prompting us to determine which one is the best. In order to address this issue, we arranged a contest in which all four 1D models and one additional 3D model (T3D) were entered. Uniform methodology for classifying the models was applied and included an analysis of: (i) post-1ocalization travel-time residuals, (ii) residuals of the P-wave first-motion incidence angle and (iii) model-predicted and measured Rayleigh-wave dispersion. We discovered that no single model was unequivocally the most optimal, as the differences between them proved rather minor. A common shortcoming of all the models is the bias of the P-wave first motion incidence angle residuals, which may be a general problem for methods working with P-wave amplitudes (e.g., moment tensor solutions). The VOG model was selected with a weak preference. Finally, we propose a simple method for modifying any of the 1D models by adding a station-dependent surface layer with a vertical velocity gradient. This way, a pseudo-3D model is generated which is fully competitive with a true 3D model while retaining the simplicity of 1D ray tracing. The efficiency of this correction was demonstrated using the VOG model. The corrected VOG model provides post-1ocalization residuals comparable with the true 3D model T3D, has zero bias in predicting the P-wave first-motion incidence angles, and agrees acceptably in predicting the Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity known from other sources. While calculations with a 3D model can be clumsy, the proposed pseudo-3D model is defined by few parameters and is very easy to use. Its applicability is limited to earthquake sources deeper than the deepest lower limit of the topmost layer below the stations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-024-1221-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数处理地震资料的方法都要求给定区域具有合适的速度模型特征。冰岛西南部的雷克雅内斯半岛也是如此,在那里建立了雷克雅内特地震台网,以监测裂谷带的当地地震活动。目前,有四种先前发表的一维速度模型(SIL, BRA, TRY和VOG)可以使用,这促使我们确定哪一种是最好的。为了解决这个问题,我们安排了一场比赛,所有四个1D模型和一个额外的3D模型(T3D)都参加了比赛。采用统一的方法对模型进行分类,包括:(i)定位后的行时残差,(ii)纵波首次运动入射角残差,以及(iii)模型预测和测量的瑞利波色散。我们发现没有一个模型是明确的最优的,因为它们之间的差异被证明是相当小的。所有模型的一个共同缺点是p波第一次运动入射角残差的偏差,这可能是处理p波振幅的方法(例如,矩张量解)的一般问题。对VOG模型的选择有弱偏好。最后,我们提出了一种简单的方法,通过添加具有垂直速度梯度的台站相关面层来修改任何一维模型。这样,生成的伪3D模型与真正的3D模型完全竞争,同时保留了1D光线追踪的简单性。利用VOG模型验证了这种校正的有效性。修正后的VOG模型提供了与真实3D模型T3D相当的定位后残差,在预测纵波首次运动入射角方面没有偏差,并且在预测从其他来源已知的瑞利波相速度方面也可以接受。虽然使用3D模型进行计算可能会很笨拙,但所提出的伪3D模型由很少的参数定义,并且非常易于使用。它的适用性仅限于震源深度大于台站以下最上层最深下限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervision of seismic velocity models of the Reykjanes Peninsula Rift, SW Iceland

Most methods for processing seismological data require a suitable velocity model characteristic for the given region being defined. This is also the case of the Reykjanes Peninsula in SW Iceland, where the REYKJANET seismic network was built to monitor local seismicity in the rift zone. At present, four previously published 1D velocity models (SIL, BRA, TRY and VOG) can potentially be used, prompting us to determine which one is the best. In order to address this issue, we arranged a contest in which all four 1D models and one additional 3D model (T3D) were entered. Uniform methodology for classifying the models was applied and included an analysis of: (i) post-1ocalization travel-time residuals, (ii) residuals of the P-wave first-motion incidence angle and (iii) model-predicted and measured Rayleigh-wave dispersion. We discovered that no single model was unequivocally the most optimal, as the differences between them proved rather minor. A common shortcoming of all the models is the bias of the P-wave first motion incidence angle residuals, which may be a general problem for methods working with P-wave amplitudes (e.g., moment tensor solutions). The VOG model was selected with a weak preference. Finally, we propose a simple method for modifying any of the 1D models by adding a station-dependent surface layer with a vertical velocity gradient. This way, a pseudo-3D model is generated which is fully competitive with a true 3D model while retaining the simplicity of 1D ray tracing. The efficiency of this correction was demonstrated using the VOG model. The corrected VOG model provides post-1ocalization residuals comparable with the true 3D model T3D, has zero bias in predicting the P-wave first-motion incidence angles, and agrees acceptably in predicting the Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity known from other sources. While calculations with a 3D model can be clumsy, the proposed pseudo-3D model is defined by few parameters and is very easy to use. Its applicability is limited to earthquake sources deeper than the deepest lower limit of the topmost layer below the stations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信