中国能源三难问题的多维评估与动态演化

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tie Wei, Zhicheng Duan, Pin Xie
{"title":"中国能源三难问题的多维评估与动态演化","authors":"Tie Wei,&nbsp;Zhicheng Duan,&nbsp;Pin Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global energy dynamics are currently undergoing a critical transition toward low-carbon systems while maintaining high-quality development standards. However, this transition is hindered by the “energy trilemma,” which illustrates the inherent conflict between energy equity, security, and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the dynamics of this trilemma across spatiotemporal contexts, focusing on China, a country grappling with regional disparities in energy development. Through a multi-dimensional assessment, strategic countermeasures are discussed to mitigate the challenges posed by the energy trilemma. Key findings: (1) China's coordinated energy development remained low (0.4–0.5) from 2001 to 2021, with growth decelerating after surpassing the 0.5 coordination index threshold. (2) Energy equity, leading 57 % of provinces to 83 %, along with a decline in provinces lagging in environmental sustainability from 7 to 2 drove China's transition from nearly disordered to barely coordinated levels. (3) The spatial pattern remained uniform until 2015, with changes in environmental sustainability and security shaping regional characteristics from 2015 to 2021. (4) Under non-spatial conditions, provinces below 0.25 improved to 0.3–0.35 within three years. Static conditions showed positive spillovers, with neighbors above 0.6 reaching 0.55–0.6. In dynamic conditions, regional disparities appeared (5) Projections show strong internal stability by 2025, but the probability of disordered provinces advancing increases from 34.4 % to 61.9 % by 2030, while transition provinces reaching coordinated growth rises from 21.4 % to 39.8 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 107914"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The multi-dimensional assessment and dynamic evolution of the energy trilemma in China\",\"authors\":\"Tie Wei,&nbsp;Zhicheng Duan,&nbsp;Pin Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global energy dynamics are currently undergoing a critical transition toward low-carbon systems while maintaining high-quality development standards. However, this transition is hindered by the “energy trilemma,” which illustrates the inherent conflict between energy equity, security, and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the dynamics of this trilemma across spatiotemporal contexts, focusing on China, a country grappling with regional disparities in energy development. Through a multi-dimensional assessment, strategic countermeasures are discussed to mitigate the challenges posed by the energy trilemma. Key findings: (1) China's coordinated energy development remained low (0.4–0.5) from 2001 to 2021, with growth decelerating after surpassing the 0.5 coordination index threshold. (2) Energy equity, leading 57 % of provinces to 83 %, along with a decline in provinces lagging in environmental sustainability from 7 to 2 drove China's transition from nearly disordered to barely coordinated levels. (3) The spatial pattern remained uniform until 2015, with changes in environmental sustainability and security shaping regional characteristics from 2015 to 2021. (4) Under non-spatial conditions, provinces below 0.25 improved to 0.3–0.35 within three years. Static conditions showed positive spillovers, with neighbors above 0.6 reaching 0.55–0.6. In dynamic conditions, regional disparities appeared (5) Projections show strong internal stability by 2025, but the probability of disordered provinces advancing increases from 34.4 % to 61.9 % by 2030, while transition provinces reaching coordinated growth rises from 21.4 % to 39.8 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001118\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The multi-dimensional assessment and dynamic evolution of the energy trilemma in China
Global energy dynamics are currently undergoing a critical transition toward low-carbon systems while maintaining high-quality development standards. However, this transition is hindered by the “energy trilemma,” which illustrates the inherent conflict between energy equity, security, and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the dynamics of this trilemma across spatiotemporal contexts, focusing on China, a country grappling with regional disparities in energy development. Through a multi-dimensional assessment, strategic countermeasures are discussed to mitigate the challenges posed by the energy trilemma. Key findings: (1) China's coordinated energy development remained low (0.4–0.5) from 2001 to 2021, with growth decelerating after surpassing the 0.5 coordination index threshold. (2) Energy equity, leading 57 % of provinces to 83 %, along with a decline in provinces lagging in environmental sustainability from 7 to 2 drove China's transition from nearly disordered to barely coordinated levels. (3) The spatial pattern remained uniform until 2015, with changes in environmental sustainability and security shaping regional characteristics from 2015 to 2021. (4) Under non-spatial conditions, provinces below 0.25 improved to 0.3–0.35 within three years. Static conditions showed positive spillovers, with neighbors above 0.6 reaching 0.55–0.6. In dynamic conditions, regional disparities appeared (5) Projections show strong internal stability by 2025, but the probability of disordered provinces advancing increases from 34.4 % to 61.9 % by 2030, while transition provinces reaching coordinated growth rises from 21.4 % to 39.8 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信