角膜里有时钟吗?

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eric B. Papas , Nuriye Gunler , Shalini Nanayakkara , Azadeh Tavakoli , Sultan Alotaibi , Vinod Maseedupally , Nico Dames
{"title":"角膜里有时钟吗?","authors":"Eric B. Papas ,&nbsp;Nuriye Gunler ,&nbsp;Shalini Nanayakkara ,&nbsp;Azadeh Tavakoli ,&nbsp;Sultan Alotaibi ,&nbsp;Vinod Maseedupally ,&nbsp;Nico Dames","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p &gt; 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p &gt; 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 110356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a clock in the cornea?\",\"authors\":\"Eric B. Papas ,&nbsp;Nuriye Gunler ,&nbsp;Shalini Nanayakkara ,&nbsp;Azadeh Tavakoli ,&nbsp;Sultan Alotaibi ,&nbsp;Vinod Maseedupally ,&nbsp;Nico Dames\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p &gt; 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p &gt; 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525001277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525001277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

夜间角膜肿胀反应通常归因于缺氧,但其他因素,如渗透压,也可能起作用。很少有人考虑到的另一种说法是,这种反应代表了一种由暗/光周期引发的生物节律。本研究的目的就是调查这种可能性。10名参与者戴着护目镜,只阻挡一只眼睛的光线,同时允许正常眨眼并进入外部环境。在佩戴护目镜6小时前和6小时后,测量双眼角膜厚度(上皮层和间质层,中央和4个同心环空)、眼压和泪膜渗透压。数据采用线性混合模型拟合,以评估光剥夺的影响。光暴露眼角膜中央厚度的平均变化(SD)上皮为6.8 (8.1)μm,间质为- 4.0 (9.3)μm。失光眼对应值为−0.1(10.8) μm和5.1 (10.6)μm。无光眼和有光眼之间角膜厚度(上皮或间质)的变化在任何位置都不显著(p >;0.23)。眼压和泪膜渗透压均未发生显著变化(p >;0.6)。这些数据表明,单眼黑暗不会产生角膜厚度变化,这一发现不支持人类角膜厚度控制是光介导的假设。这种机制确实存在的可能性仍然存在,但对反应的贡献相对较小,并且/或者具有目前尚未确定的触发机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is there a clock in the cornea?

Is there a clock in the cornea?
The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p > 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p > 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental eye research
Experimental eye research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
323
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信