Eric B. Papas , Nuriye Gunler , Shalini Nanayakkara , Azadeh Tavakoli , Sultan Alotaibi , Vinod Maseedupally , Nico Dames
{"title":"角膜里有时钟吗?","authors":"Eric B. Papas , Nuriye Gunler , Shalini Nanayakkara , Azadeh Tavakoli , Sultan Alotaibi , Vinod Maseedupally , Nico Dames","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p > 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p > 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 110356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a clock in the cornea?\",\"authors\":\"Eric B. Papas , Nuriye Gunler , Shalini Nanayakkara , Azadeh Tavakoli , Sultan Alotaibi , Vinod Maseedupally , Nico Dames\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p > 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p > 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525001277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525001277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The overnight corneal swelling response is generally attributed to hypoxia but other factors, such as osmolarity, may contribute. A seldom considered alternative is that the response represents a biological rhythm instigated by the dark/light cycle. The purpose of this study was to investigate that possibility. Ten participants wore goggles designed to exclude light from one eye only, while allowing normal blinking and access to the external atmosphere. Measurements taken from both eyes, prior to and after 6 h of goggle wear, included corneal thickness (epithelial and stromal, centrally and in 4 concentric annuli), intraocular pressure and tear film osmolarity. Data were fitted by linear mixed models to assess the effect of light deprivation. Mean changes (SD) in central corneal thickness for light exposed eyes were 6.8 (8.1) μm in the epithelium and −4.0 (9.3) μm in the stroma. Corresponding values for light deprived eyes were −.1 (10.8) μm and 5.1 (10.6) μm. Corneal thickness changes (epithelial or stromal) between light deprived and light exposed eyes were not significant in any location (p > 0.23). Neither intraocular pressure, nor tear film osmolarity altered significantly (p > 0.6). These data show that monocular darkness does not generate corneal thickness changes, a finding which does not support the hypothesis that corneal thickness control is light mediated in humans. The possibility remains that such a mechanism does exist but contributes only a relatively minor portion to the response and/or has a triggering mechanism that is presently uncharacterised.
期刊介绍:
The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.