利用本地灵活性市场进行配电网拥塞管理:调查影响因素

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mehdi Attar , Sami Repo , Ville Heikkilä , Olli Suominen
{"title":"利用本地灵活性市场进行配电网拥塞管理:调查影响因素","authors":"Mehdi Attar ,&nbsp;Sami Repo ,&nbsp;Ville Heikkilä ,&nbsp;Olli Suominen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article presents findings on congestion management (CM) in distribution grids using the local flexibility market (LFM). It employs a co-simulation platform to decompose system complexity into manageable components, enabling realistic and comprehensive modeling. Through simulation, the study examines the effectiveness of flexibility in CM and the data exchange dynamics between the distribution system operator (DSO), LFM, and flexibility service provider (FSP) using a case study based on real data from a 359-bus distribution grid in Finland. Regarding flexibility effectiveness, the case study reveals that a larger BA in LFM can intensify voltage congestion, despite enhancing market liquidity. This underscores the trade-off between congestion mitigation and market liquidity, which must be carefully considered when determining BA size in LFM. The study also explores the rebound phenomenon and its negative impact on the grid, highlighting two key influencing factors: the charging/discharging inefficiency of battery storage and the grid’s operational state during rebound events. On data exchange, the article outlines key considerations for communication between the DSO, LFM, and FSP. These include message content, methods for calculating key parameters (such as BA, using sensitivity analysis), and the sequence of message exchanges between stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 110601"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congestion management in distribution grids using local flexibility markets: Investigating influential factors\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Attar ,&nbsp;Sami Repo ,&nbsp;Ville Heikkilä ,&nbsp;Olli Suominen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The article presents findings on congestion management (CM) in distribution grids using the local flexibility market (LFM). It employs a co-simulation platform to decompose system complexity into manageable components, enabling realistic and comprehensive modeling. Through simulation, the study examines the effectiveness of flexibility in CM and the data exchange dynamics between the distribution system operator (DSO), LFM, and flexibility service provider (FSP) using a case study based on real data from a 359-bus distribution grid in Finland. Regarding flexibility effectiveness, the case study reveals that a larger BA in LFM can intensify voltage congestion, despite enhancing market liquidity. This underscores the trade-off between congestion mitigation and market liquidity, which must be carefully considered when determining BA size in LFM. The study also explores the rebound phenomenon and its negative impact on the grid, highlighting two key influencing factors: the charging/discharging inefficiency of battery storage and the grid’s operational state during rebound events. On data exchange, the article outlines key considerations for communication between the DSO, LFM, and FSP. These include message content, methods for calculating key parameters (such as BA, using sensitivity analysis), and the sequence of message exchanges between stakeholders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061525001528\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061525001528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章介绍了利用本地灵活性市场(LFM)进行配电网拥塞管理(CM)的研究成果。它采用了协同仿真平台,将系统复杂性分解为可管理的组成部分,从而实现了现实和全面的建模。通过仿真,该研究使用基于芬兰 359 总线配电网真实数据的案例研究,检验了 CM 中灵活性的有效性,以及配电系统运营商 (DSO)、LFM 和灵活性服务提供商 (FSP) 之间的数据交换动态。关于灵活性的有效性,案例研究表明,尽管提高了市场流动性,但 LFM 中更大的 BA 会加剧电压拥塞。这凸显了缓解拥塞与市场流动性之间的权衡,在确定低频配电网中的 BA 规模时必须仔细考虑这一点。研究还探讨了反弹现象及其对电网的负面影响,强调了两个关键影响因素:电池储能的充放电效率低下和反弹事件期间的电网运行状态。在数据交换方面,文章概述了 DSO、LFM 和 FSP 之间通信的主要注意事项。其中包括信息内容、计算关键参数的方法(如利用敏感性分析计算 BA)以及利益相关者之间的信息交换顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Congestion management in distribution grids using local flexibility markets: Investigating influential factors
The article presents findings on congestion management (CM) in distribution grids using the local flexibility market (LFM). It employs a co-simulation platform to decompose system complexity into manageable components, enabling realistic and comprehensive modeling. Through simulation, the study examines the effectiveness of flexibility in CM and the data exchange dynamics between the distribution system operator (DSO), LFM, and flexibility service provider (FSP) using a case study based on real data from a 359-bus distribution grid in Finland. Regarding flexibility effectiveness, the case study reveals that a larger BA in LFM can intensify voltage congestion, despite enhancing market liquidity. This underscores the trade-off between congestion mitigation and market liquidity, which must be carefully considered when determining BA size in LFM. The study also explores the rebound phenomenon and its negative impact on the grid, highlighting two key influencing factors: the charging/discharging inefficiency of battery storage and the grid’s operational state during rebound events. On data exchange, the article outlines key considerations for communication between the DSO, LFM, and FSP. These include message content, methods for calculating key parameters (such as BA, using sensitivity analysis), and the sequence of message exchanges between stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1022
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: The journal covers theoretical developments in electrical power and energy systems and their applications. The coverage embraces: generation and network planning; reliability; long and short term operation; expert systems; neural networks; object oriented systems; system control centres; database and information systems; stock and parameter estimation; system security and adequacy; network theory, modelling and computation; small and large system dynamics; dynamic model identification; on-line control including load and switching control; protection; distribution systems; energy economics; impact of non-conventional systems; and man-machine interfaces. As well as original research papers, the journal publishes short contributions, book reviews and conference reports. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信