变革之风?德州对风能项目的态度及其对选举的影响

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Talbot M. Andrews , Carol Atkinson-Palombo , Oksan Bayulgen , Adam Gallaher , Lyle Scruggs
{"title":"变革之风?德州对风能项目的态度及其对选举的影响","authors":"Talbot M. Andrews ,&nbsp;Carol Atkinson-Palombo ,&nbsp;Oksan Bayulgen ,&nbsp;Adam Gallaher ,&nbsp;Lyle Scruggs","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals that public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012 to 2022, turbine construction increased state legislative incumbent vote share. Despite increasing partisan differences on the topic of renewable energy, voters, on average, evaluate local costs and benefits and do not punish incumbent state legislators after local projects are constructed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114608"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The winds of change? Attitudes toward wind projects and their electoral implications in Texas\",\"authors\":\"Talbot M. Andrews ,&nbsp;Carol Atkinson-Palombo ,&nbsp;Oksan Bayulgen ,&nbsp;Adam Gallaher ,&nbsp;Lyle Scruggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals that public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012 to 2022, turbine construction increased state legislative incumbent vote share. Despite increasing partisan differences on the topic of renewable energy, voters, on average, evaluate local costs and benefits and do not punish incumbent state legislators after local projects are constructed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001156\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风能的成本竞争力越来越强,但越来越多的人担心,党派间的强烈反对将限制这种低碳能源的迅速采用。在评估风力发电项目时,选民是否会考虑涡轮机建设在当地的成本和收益?或者他们的观点反映了精英在这个问题上的两极分化?为了回答这些问题,我们以德克萨斯州为例:在风电项目可行性和精英在风电开发问题上的两极分化方面,德克萨斯州都处于最前沿。对德州人的日常调查显示,公众对风力发电的看法主要是出于对当地成本和收益的考虑,平均持积极态度。这些观点影响了投票选择:转向2012年至2022年的选举结果,涡轮机建设增加了州立法在职者的选票份额。尽管两党在可再生能源问题上的分歧越来越大,但平均而言,选民会评估当地的成本和收益,并且在当地项目建成后不会惩罚现任州议员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The winds of change? Attitudes toward wind projects and their electoral implications in Texas
Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals that public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012 to 2022, turbine construction increased state legislative incumbent vote share. Despite increasing partisan differences on the topic of renewable energy, voters, on average, evaluate local costs and benefits and do not punish incumbent state legislators after local projects are constructed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信