研究卡泊芬净、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、克霉唑和两性霉素B对引起真菌性角膜炎的临床分离株的敏感性及体外联合用药

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Shaghayegh Moghadam , Hossein Zarrinfar , Ali Naseri , Javad Sadeghi , Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh , Rozhan Heydarian
{"title":"研究卡泊芬净、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、克霉唑和两性霉素B对引起真菌性角膜炎的临床分离株的敏感性及体外联合用药","authors":"Shaghayegh Moghadam ,&nbsp;Hossein Zarrinfar ,&nbsp;Ali Naseri ,&nbsp;Javad Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh ,&nbsp;Rozhan Heydarian","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fungal keratitis is a global cause of blindness, highlighting the need to assess antifungal treatment efficacy before clinical use. This study evaluates the synergistic and antagonistic effects of antifungal agents on fungal keratitis isolates. Susceptibility testing of 35 corneal isolates including <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., <em>Neocosmospora</em> spp., <em>Candida albicans, Penicillium chrysogenum</em> was performed with broth microdilution and checkerboard methods to test six antifungal agents (caspofungin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, clotrimazole). Among <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., the MIC ranges were reported as 0.01–1, 0.5–16, 32–64, 0.06–16, 0.125–8, and 0.25–4 µg/mL for caspofungin, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and clotrimazole, respectively. For <em>Fusarium/Neocosmospora</em> spp., these ranges varied to 0.01–8, 0.125–4, 64, 0.03–16, 0.25–8, and 0.5–8 µg/mL for the same drugs. In <em>Candida</em> spp., the MIC ranges were 0.01–0.03, 0.25, 64, ≥16, ≥16, and 0.5–1 µg/mL for the same antifungal agents. Notably, the combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B exhibited 100% synergistic effects against <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., while combinations of clotrimazole, fluconazole, or voriconazole with amphotericin B showed a 50% synergistic effect against <em>Fusarium/Neocosmospora</em> spp. Furthermore, fluconazole combined with voriconazole or itraconazole, as well as voriconazole and itraconazole, demonstrated 100% synergism against <em>Candida</em> spp. The results indicate that caspofungin is the most effective antifungal agent, while fluconazole exhibited the highest rates of resistance. The combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B proved most effective against <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., azole compounds combined with amphotericin B were most effective against <em>Fusarium/ Neocosmospora</em> spp., and combinations of fluconazole with voriconazole or itraconazole and voriconazole and itraconazole demonstrated synergistic effects against <em>Candida</em> spp.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"112 3","pages":"Article 116806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the susceptibility profiles and in vitro combinations of caspofungin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, clotrimazole, and amphotericin B against clinical isolates causing fungal keratitis\",\"authors\":\"Shaghayegh Moghadam ,&nbsp;Hossein Zarrinfar ,&nbsp;Ali Naseri ,&nbsp;Javad Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh ,&nbsp;Rozhan Heydarian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fungal keratitis is a global cause of blindness, highlighting the need to assess antifungal treatment efficacy before clinical use. This study evaluates the synergistic and antagonistic effects of antifungal agents on fungal keratitis isolates. Susceptibility testing of 35 corneal isolates including <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., <em>Neocosmospora</em> spp., <em>Candida albicans, Penicillium chrysogenum</em> was performed with broth microdilution and checkerboard methods to test six antifungal agents (caspofungin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, clotrimazole). Among <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., the MIC ranges were reported as 0.01–1, 0.5–16, 32–64, 0.06–16, 0.125–8, and 0.25–4 µg/mL for caspofungin, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and clotrimazole, respectively. For <em>Fusarium/Neocosmospora</em> spp., these ranges varied to 0.01–8, 0.125–4, 64, 0.03–16, 0.25–8, and 0.5–8 µg/mL for the same drugs. In <em>Candida</em> spp., the MIC ranges were 0.01–0.03, 0.25, 64, ≥16, ≥16, and 0.5–1 µg/mL for the same antifungal agents. Notably, the combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B exhibited 100% synergistic effects against <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., while combinations of clotrimazole, fluconazole, or voriconazole with amphotericin B showed a 50% synergistic effect against <em>Fusarium/Neocosmospora</em> spp. Furthermore, fluconazole combined with voriconazole or itraconazole, as well as voriconazole and itraconazole, demonstrated 100% synergism against <em>Candida</em> spp. The results indicate that caspofungin is the most effective antifungal agent, while fluconazole exhibited the highest rates of resistance. The combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B proved most effective against <em>Aspergillus</em> spp., azole compounds combined with amphotericin B were most effective against <em>Fusarium/ Neocosmospora</em> spp., and combinations of fluconazole with voriconazole or itraconazole and voriconazole and itraconazole demonstrated synergistic effects against <em>Candida</em> spp.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease\",\"volume\":\"112 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 116806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325001294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325001294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真菌性角膜炎是一种全球性的致盲原因,因此在临床使用前需要评估抗真菌治疗的疗效。本研究评估了抗真菌药物对真菌性角膜炎分离株的增效和拮抗作用。采用微量肉汤稀释法和棋盘法对35株角膜分离物进行了曲霉、新cosmospora、白色念珠菌、青霉菌的药敏试验,检测了6种抗真菌药物(caspofungin、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、两性霉素B、克霉唑)。曲霉中caspofungin、两性霉素B、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、伏立康唑和克霉唑的MIC分别为0.01 ~ 1、0.5 ~ 16、32 ~ 64、0.06 ~ 16、0.125 ~ 8和0.25 ~ 4µg/mL。对于镰刀菌/新宇宙孢子菌,相同的药物,这些范围分别为0.01-8、0.125-4、64、0.03-16、0.25-8和0.5-8µg/mL。在假丝酵母中,相同抗真菌药物的MIC范围分别为0.01 ~ 0.03、0.25、64、≥16、≥16和0.5 ~ 1µg/mL。值得注意的是,卡泊真菌素与两性霉素B合用对曲霉的协同作用为100%,而克霉唑、氟康唑或伏立康唑与两性霉素B合用对镰刀菌/新cosmospora spp的协同作用为50%。氟康唑与伏立康唑或伊曲康唑合用,以及伏立康唑与伊曲康唑合用。结果表明,卡泊真菌素对念珠菌的拮抗效果最好,氟康唑对念珠菌的耐药率最高。氟康唑与伏立康唑或伊曲康唑联用、伏立康唑与伊曲康唑联用对假丝酵母菌的拮抗效果最佳,唑类化合物与两性霉素B联用对镰刀菌/新cosmospora的拮抗效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the susceptibility profiles and in vitro combinations of caspofungin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, clotrimazole, and amphotericin B against clinical isolates causing fungal keratitis
Fungal keratitis is a global cause of blindness, highlighting the need to assess antifungal treatment efficacy before clinical use. This study evaluates the synergistic and antagonistic effects of antifungal agents on fungal keratitis isolates. Susceptibility testing of 35 corneal isolates including Aspergillus spp., Neocosmospora spp., Candida albicans, Penicillium chrysogenum was performed with broth microdilution and checkerboard methods to test six antifungal agents (caspofungin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, clotrimazole). Among Aspergillus spp., the MIC ranges were reported as 0.01–1, 0.5–16, 32–64, 0.06–16, 0.125–8, and 0.25–4 µg/mL for caspofungin, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and clotrimazole, respectively. For Fusarium/Neocosmospora spp., these ranges varied to 0.01–8, 0.125–4, 64, 0.03–16, 0.25–8, and 0.5–8 µg/mL for the same drugs. In Candida spp., the MIC ranges were 0.01–0.03, 0.25, 64, ≥16, ≥16, and 0.5–1 µg/mL for the same antifungal agents. Notably, the combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B exhibited 100% synergistic effects against Aspergillus spp., while combinations of clotrimazole, fluconazole, or voriconazole with amphotericin B showed a 50% synergistic effect against Fusarium/Neocosmospora spp. Furthermore, fluconazole combined with voriconazole or itraconazole, as well as voriconazole and itraconazole, demonstrated 100% synergism against Candida spp. The results indicate that caspofungin is the most effective antifungal agent, while fluconazole exhibited the highest rates of resistance. The combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B proved most effective against Aspergillus spp., azole compounds combined with amphotericin B were most effective against Fusarium/ Neocosmospora spp., and combinations of fluconazole with voriconazole or itraconazole and voriconazole and itraconazole demonstrated synergistic effects against Candida spp.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信