TBM盘式铣刀比能预测的前沿方法:将COSSA-RF模型与三种解释技术相结合

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jian Zhou , Zijian Liu , Chuanqi Li , Kun Du , Haiqing Yang
{"title":"TBM盘式铣刀比能预测的前沿方法:将COSSA-RF模型与三种解释技术相结合","authors":"Jian Zhou ,&nbsp;Zijian Liu ,&nbsp;Chuanqi Li ,&nbsp;Kun Du ,&nbsp;Haiqing Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Specific energy (SE) is an important index to measure crushing efficiency in mechanized tunnel excavation. Accurate prediction of the SE of tunnel boring machine disc cutters is important for optimizing the crushing process, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing machine wear. Therefore, in this paper, the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), combined with six chaotic mapping strategies, is utilized to optimize the random forest (RF) model for predicting SE, referred to as the COSSA-RF prediction models. For this purpose, an SE prediction database was established for training and validating model performance, encompassing 160 sets of experimental data, each with six input parameters: uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), disc cutter diameter (<em>D</em>), cutter tip width (<em>T</em>), cutter spacing (<em>S</em>), and cutter penetration depth (<em>P</em>), along with a target parameter, SE. The evaluation results indicate that the COSSA-RF models demonstrate superior performance compared to other four machine learning models. In particular, the Chebyshev map-SSA-RF (CHSSA-RF) model achieves the most satisfactory prediction accuracy among all models, resulting in the highest coefficient of determination <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> and dynamic variance-weighted global performance indicator values (0.9756 and 0.0814) and the lowest values of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (6.4742, 4.0003, and 20.41%). Lastly, the results of interpretability analysis of the best model through SHapley Additive exPlanations, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and Vivid methods show that the importance of input parameters ranked as follows: UCS, BTS, <em>P</em>, <em>S</em>, <em>T</em>, and <em>D</em>. Moreover, interactions between parameters (UCS and BTS, BTS and <em>P</em>, and BTS and <em>S</em>) significantly influence the model predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 241-262"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cutting-edge approaches to specific energy prediction in TBM disc cutters: Integrating COSSA-RF model with three interpretative techniques\",\"authors\":\"Jian Zhou ,&nbsp;Zijian Liu ,&nbsp;Chuanqi Li ,&nbsp;Kun Du ,&nbsp;Haiqing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Specific energy (SE) is an important index to measure crushing efficiency in mechanized tunnel excavation. Accurate prediction of the SE of tunnel boring machine disc cutters is important for optimizing the crushing process, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing machine wear. Therefore, in this paper, the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), combined with six chaotic mapping strategies, is utilized to optimize the random forest (RF) model for predicting SE, referred to as the COSSA-RF prediction models. For this purpose, an SE prediction database was established for training and validating model performance, encompassing 160 sets of experimental data, each with six input parameters: uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), disc cutter diameter (<em>D</em>), cutter tip width (<em>T</em>), cutter spacing (<em>S</em>), and cutter penetration depth (<em>P</em>), along with a target parameter, SE. The evaluation results indicate that the COSSA-RF models demonstrate superior performance compared to other four machine learning models. In particular, the Chebyshev map-SSA-RF (CHSSA-RF) model achieves the most satisfactory prediction accuracy among all models, resulting in the highest coefficient of determination <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> and dynamic variance-weighted global performance indicator values (0.9756 and 0.0814) and the lowest values of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (6.4742, 4.0003, and 20.41%). Lastly, the results of interpretability analysis of the best model through SHapley Additive exPlanations, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and Vivid methods show that the importance of input parameters ranked as follows: UCS, BTS, <em>P</em>, <em>S</em>, <em>T</em>, and <em>D</em>. Moreover, interactions between parameters (UCS and BTS, BTS and <em>P</em>, and BTS and <em>S</em>) significantly influence the model predictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 241-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425000170\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425000170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比能(SE)是衡量机械化隧道开挖破碎效率的重要指标。准确预测隧道掘进机盘式铣刀的切削效率对优化破碎工艺、降低能耗、减少机器磨损具有重要意义。因此,本文利用麻雀搜索算法(SSA),结合6种混沌映射策略,对预测SE的随机森林(RF)模型进行优化,简称COSSA-RF预测模型。为此,我们建立了一个SE预测数据库,用于训练和验证模型的性能,该数据库包含160组实验数据,每组数据有6个输入参数:单轴抗压强度(UCS)、巴西抗拉强度(BTS)、盘式刀具直径(D)、刀具尖端宽度(T)、刀具间距(S)和刀具穿透深度(P),以及目标参数SE。评估结果表明,与其他四种机器学习模型相比,COSSA-RF模型表现出优越的性能。其中,Chebyshev map-SSA-RF (CHSSA-RF)模型的预测精度在所有模型中最令人满意,其决定系数R2和动态方差加权全局性能指标值最高(0.9756和0.0814),均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)最低(6.4742、4.0003和20.41%)。最后,通过SHapley加性解释、局部可解释模型不可知解释和Vivid方法对最佳模型的可解释性分析结果表明,输入参数的重要性依次为:UCS、BTS、P、S、T和d,参数之间的交互作用(UCS与BTS、BTS与P、BTS与S)显著影响模型预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cutting-edge approaches to specific energy prediction in TBM disc cutters: Integrating COSSA-RF model with three interpretative techniques
Specific energy (SE) is an important index to measure crushing efficiency in mechanized tunnel excavation. Accurate prediction of the SE of tunnel boring machine disc cutters is important for optimizing the crushing process, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing machine wear. Therefore, in this paper, the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), combined with six chaotic mapping strategies, is utilized to optimize the random forest (RF) model for predicting SE, referred to as the COSSA-RF prediction models. For this purpose, an SE prediction database was established for training and validating model performance, encompassing 160 sets of experimental data, each with six input parameters: uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), disc cutter diameter (D), cutter tip width (T), cutter spacing (S), and cutter penetration depth (P), along with a target parameter, SE. The evaluation results indicate that the COSSA-RF models demonstrate superior performance compared to other four machine learning models. In particular, the Chebyshev map-SSA-RF (CHSSA-RF) model achieves the most satisfactory prediction accuracy among all models, resulting in the highest coefficient of determination R2 and dynamic variance-weighted global performance indicator values (0.9756 and 0.0814) and the lowest values of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (6.4742, 4.0003, and 20.41%). Lastly, the results of interpretability analysis of the best model through SHapley Additive exPlanations, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and Vivid methods show that the importance of input parameters ranked as follows: UCS, BTS, P, S, T, and D. Moreover, interactions between parameters (UCS and BTS, BTS and P, and BTS and S) significantly influence the model predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信