利用有限元分析解决电动水上飞机CFRP机翼结构认证挑战

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Jonathan Tapullima, Bjørn Haugen
{"title":"利用有限元分析解决电动水上飞机CFRP机翼结构认证挑战","authors":"Jonathan Tapullima,&nbsp;Bjørn Haugen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the structural certification challenges and business objectives for an electric seaplane in the general aviation category, emphasizing the verification of the composite structure under EASA CS-23. Sandwich structures and bonded joints offer significant weight reduction and structural efficiency advantages, crucial for electric aircraft. However, a fatigue damage and tolerance evaluation under CS-23 Level 4 increase these challenges, requiring exhaustive testing, analysis, and documentation to meet stringent regulatory standards. Certification complexities are further intensified by the differences in passenger capacity constraints between Level 3 and Level 4 aircraft, suggesting pursuing Level 3 certification and impacting on the business case of the emerging sustainable aviation. To evaluate the impact on the weight penalties, this study conducts a comprehensive FEM validation and comparison of two different CFRP wing structural analyses: one to comply with Level 3 certification using a monocoque sandwich structure with a bonded assembly, and the other to comply with Level 4 certification using semi-monocoque with a mechanically fastened assembly. The use of different strain allowable values for both levels defined the current strain constraints range for the composite wings, where the monocoque structure analysis showed a mass reduction of up to 19 % on average.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing structural certification challenges with FEM analysis in electric seaplane CFRP wing\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Tapullima,&nbsp;Bjørn Haugen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the structural certification challenges and business objectives for an electric seaplane in the general aviation category, emphasizing the verification of the composite structure under EASA CS-23. Sandwich structures and bonded joints offer significant weight reduction and structural efficiency advantages, crucial for electric aircraft. However, a fatigue damage and tolerance evaluation under CS-23 Level 4 increase these challenges, requiring exhaustive testing, analysis, and documentation to meet stringent regulatory standards. Certification complexities are further intensified by the differences in passenger capacity constraints between Level 3 and Level 4 aircraft, suggesting pursuing Level 3 certification and impacting on the business case of the emerging sustainable aviation. To evaluate the impact on the weight penalties, this study conducts a comprehensive FEM validation and comparison of two different CFRP wing structural analyses: one to comply with Level 3 certification using a monocoque sandwich structure with a bonded assembly, and the other to comply with Level 4 certification using semi-monocoque with a mechanically fastened assembly. The use of different strain allowable values for both levels defined the current strain constraints range for the composite wings, where the monocoque structure analysis showed a mass reduction of up to 19 % on average.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了通用航空类别电动水上飞机的结构认证挑战和业务目标,重点是在EASA CS-23下对复合材料结构进行验证。夹层结构和粘合接头具有显著的重量减轻和结构效率优势,这对电动飞机至关重要。然而,CS-23 Level 4下的疲劳损伤和容差评估增加了这些挑战,需要详尽的测试、分析和记录,以满足严格的监管标准。3级和4级飞机在载客量限制方面的差异进一步加剧了认证的复杂性,这表明追求3级认证将对新兴的可持续航空的商业案例产生影响。为了评估对重量惩罚的影响,本研究对两种不同的CFRP机翼结构分析进行了全面的有限元验证和比较:一种是采用带粘合组件的单体结构夹层结构符合三级认证,另一种是采用带机械紧固组件的半单体结构符合四级认证。对两种水平使用不同的应变允许值定义了复合材料机翼的当前应变约束范围,其中单壳结构分析显示质量平均减少高达19%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing structural certification challenges with FEM analysis in electric seaplane CFRP wing
This study explores the structural certification challenges and business objectives for an electric seaplane in the general aviation category, emphasizing the verification of the composite structure under EASA CS-23. Sandwich structures and bonded joints offer significant weight reduction and structural efficiency advantages, crucial for electric aircraft. However, a fatigue damage and tolerance evaluation under CS-23 Level 4 increase these challenges, requiring exhaustive testing, analysis, and documentation to meet stringent regulatory standards. Certification complexities are further intensified by the differences in passenger capacity constraints between Level 3 and Level 4 aircraft, suggesting pursuing Level 3 certification and impacting on the business case of the emerging sustainable aviation. To evaluate the impact on the weight penalties, this study conducts a comprehensive FEM validation and comparison of two different CFRP wing structural analyses: one to comply with Level 3 certification using a monocoque sandwich structure with a bonded assembly, and the other to comply with Level 4 certification using semi-monocoque with a mechanically fastened assembly. The use of different strain allowable values for both levels defined the current strain constraints range for the composite wings, where the monocoque structure analysis showed a mass reduction of up to 19 % on average.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信