当前临床实践与心血管植入式电子设备的远程监测建议:来自远程监测数据库的现实世界分析

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Matteo Bertini MD, PhD , Antonio D’Onofrio MD , Marcello Piacenti MD , Carlo Lavalle MD , Carmelo La Greca MD , Claudia Amellone MD , Paolo Compagnucci MD , Leonardo Calò MD , Antonio Rapacciuolo MD , Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono MD , Patrizia Pepi MD , Gianluca Savarese MD , Erika Taravelli MD , Vincenzo Russo MD , Gennaro Vitulano MD , Francesco Villella MD , Francesco Vitali MD , Nicola Pierucci MD , Monica Campari MS , Sergio Valsecchi PhD , Luca Santini MD
{"title":"当前临床实践与心血管植入式电子设备的远程监测建议:来自远程监测数据库的现实世界分析","authors":"Matteo Bertini MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Antonio D’Onofrio MD ,&nbsp;Marcello Piacenti MD ,&nbsp;Carlo Lavalle MD ,&nbsp;Carmelo La Greca MD ,&nbsp;Claudia Amellone MD ,&nbsp;Paolo Compagnucci MD ,&nbsp;Leonardo Calò MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Rapacciuolo MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono MD ,&nbsp;Patrizia Pepi MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Savarese MD ,&nbsp;Erika Taravelli MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Russo MD ,&nbsp;Gennaro Vitulano MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Villella MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Vitali MD ,&nbsp;Nicola Pierucci MD ,&nbsp;Monica Campari MS ,&nbsp;Sergio Valsecchi PhD ,&nbsp;Luca Santini MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The recently published Consensus Statement on the Practical Management of Remote Device Clinics offers recommendations for managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). They recommend activating remote monitoring (RM) soon after implantation and maintaining connectivity. Moreover, it is reasonable to replace scheduled device follow-up with alert-based RM, with alert parameters customized to clinical indications to reduce RM workload.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate current clinical practice to inform adjustments to better follow recommendations and improve use of RM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 6553 CIED patients followed on the LATITUDE (Boston Scientific) remote network at 26 centers between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed. Median RM duration was 40 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patient enrollment significantly increased over the observation period. The proportion of patients enrolled within 2 weeks of implantation was 73% and within 3 months was 94%. At the time of data extraction, 14% of patients had interrupted connectivity. Scheduled device transmissions were programmed at least once every 3 months in 96% of patients for all CIED types. In 2023, 6600 in-office interrogations were performed, and 70,453 remote transmissions were reviewed. Scheduled transmissions accounted for 52% of the total, patient-initiated interrogations for 28% and alert transmissions for 20%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of RM in clinical practice is increasing, with more in-office and remote visits. Centers are not adopting the alert-based RM strategy, which would enable them to reduce the significant burden of nonactionable remote and in-office visits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 246-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current clinical practice versus remote monitoring recommendations for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: A real-world analysis from a remote monitoring database\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Bertini MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Antonio D’Onofrio MD ,&nbsp;Marcello Piacenti MD ,&nbsp;Carlo Lavalle MD ,&nbsp;Carmelo La Greca MD ,&nbsp;Claudia Amellone MD ,&nbsp;Paolo Compagnucci MD ,&nbsp;Leonardo Calò MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Rapacciuolo MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono MD ,&nbsp;Patrizia Pepi MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Savarese MD ,&nbsp;Erika Taravelli MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Russo MD ,&nbsp;Gennaro Vitulano MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Villella MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Vitali MD ,&nbsp;Nicola Pierucci MD ,&nbsp;Monica Campari MS ,&nbsp;Sergio Valsecchi PhD ,&nbsp;Luca Santini MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The recently published Consensus Statement on the Practical Management of Remote Device Clinics offers recommendations for managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). They recommend activating remote monitoring (RM) soon after implantation and maintaining connectivity. Moreover, it is reasonable to replace scheduled device follow-up with alert-based RM, with alert parameters customized to clinical indications to reduce RM workload.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate current clinical practice to inform adjustments to better follow recommendations and improve use of RM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 6553 CIED patients followed on the LATITUDE (Boston Scientific) remote network at 26 centers between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed. Median RM duration was 40 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patient enrollment significantly increased over the observation period. The proportion of patients enrolled within 2 weeks of implantation was 73% and within 3 months was 94%. At the time of data extraction, 14% of patients had interrupted connectivity. Scheduled device transmissions were programmed at least once every 3 months in 96% of patients for all CIED types. In 2023, 6600 in-office interrogations were performed, and 70,453 remote transmissions were reviewed. Scheduled transmissions accounted for 52% of the total, patient-initiated interrogations for 28% and alert transmissions for 20%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of RM in clinical practice is increasing, with more in-office and remote visits. Centers are not adopting the alert-based RM strategy, which would enable them to reduce the significant burden of nonactionable remote and in-office visits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 246-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近发表的关于远程设备诊所实际管理的共识声明为管理心血管植入式电子设备(cied)患者提供了建议。他们建议在植入后尽快激活远程监控(RM)并保持连接。此外,用基于警报的RM代替预定的设备随访是合理的,警报参数根据临床适应症定制,以减少RM的工作量。目的:本研究的目的是评估当前的临床实践,以便更好地遵循建议并改进RM的使用。方法对2010年至2023年26个中心的6553例CIED患者的数据进行分析。中位RM持续时间为40个月。结果观察期内患者入组人数显著增加。植入2周内入组的患者比例为73%,植入3个月内入组的患者比例为94%。在提取数据时,14%的患者出现了连接中断。96%的所有CIED类型患者至少每3个月进行一次计划装置传输。在2023年,进行了6600次办公室审讯,审查了70453次远程传输。计划传输占总数的52%,患者发起的询问占28%,警报传输占20%。结论RM在临床中的应用越来越多,上门和远程就诊越来越多。中心没有采用基于警报的RM策略,这将使他们能够减少不可操作的远程和办公室访问的重大负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current clinical practice versus remote monitoring recommendations for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: A real-world analysis from a remote monitoring database

Current clinical practice versus remote monitoring recommendations for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: A real-world analysis from a remote monitoring database

Background

The recently published Consensus Statement on the Practical Management of Remote Device Clinics offers recommendations for managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). They recommend activating remote monitoring (RM) soon after implantation and maintaining connectivity. Moreover, it is reasonable to replace scheduled device follow-up with alert-based RM, with alert parameters customized to clinical indications to reduce RM workload.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate current clinical practice to inform adjustments to better follow recommendations and improve use of RM.

Methods

Data from 6553 CIED patients followed on the LATITUDE (Boston Scientific) remote network at 26 centers between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed. Median RM duration was 40 months.

Results

Patient enrollment significantly increased over the observation period. The proportion of patients enrolled within 2 weeks of implantation was 73% and within 3 months was 94%. At the time of data extraction, 14% of patients had interrupted connectivity. Scheduled device transmissions were programmed at least once every 3 months in 96% of patients for all CIED types. In 2023, 6600 in-office interrogations were performed, and 70,453 remote transmissions were reviewed. Scheduled transmissions accounted for 52% of the total, patient-initiated interrogations for 28% and alert transmissions for 20%.

Conclusion

The use of RM in clinical practice is increasing, with more in-office and remote visits. Centers are not adopting the alert-based RM strategy, which would enable them to reduce the significant burden of nonactionable remote and in-office visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信