Adi Elias MD, MPH , Ibrahim Marai MD , Alon Eyal MD, PhD , Wisam Darawsha MD , Faheem Shehadeh MD , Robert Glueck MD , Roy Beinart MD , Eyal Nof MD , Yoav Michowitz MD , Michael Glikson MD , Yuval Konstantino MD , Moti Haim MD , David Luria MD , Alexander Omelchenko MD , Avishag Laish-Farkash MD, PhD , Mahmoud Suleiman MD , Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology
{"title":"低温球囊消融治疗左共同肺静脉变异性心房颤动的疗效观察","authors":"Adi Elias MD, MPH , Ibrahim Marai MD , Alon Eyal MD, PhD , Wisam Darawsha MD , Faheem Shehadeh MD , Robert Glueck MD , Roy Beinart MD , Eyal Nof MD , Yoav Michowitz MD , Michael Glikson MD , Yuval Konstantino MD , Moti Haim MD , David Luria MD , Alexander Omelchenko MD , Avishag Laish-Farkash MD, PhD , Mahmoud Suleiman MD , Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon technology is widely used for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data on its effectiveness in patients with the left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) variant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to examine the outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with the LCPV variant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry is a prospective, multicenter cohort that included citizens who underwent PVI during the years 2019–2021. Study endpoints were acute isolation success of the pulmonary veins (PVs), AF recurrence, and the need for a repeat ablation procedure at 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 74 patients with the LCPV variant and 822 patients with standard PV anatomy. The acute isolation success rate of the LPVs was significantly lower in LCPV variant patients compared with those with a standard anatomy. However, there was no significant difference in the acute isolation success rate of the right PVs between the 2 groups. At 12 months, the rates of AF recurrence did not differ significantly between the LCPV variant group (17.6%) and the standard anatomy group (11.1%) (<em>P =</em> .09), and multivariable adjustment LCPV was not associated with AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.74). Similarly, the rate of repeat ablation for recurrent AF did not differ significantly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, we found that isolating the LCPV using cryoballoon PVI was more challenging than isolating standard anatomy. Despite this, the effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation in patients with LCPV anatomy did not differ significantly from that in the standard anatomy group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 290-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left common pulmonary vein variant\",\"authors\":\"Adi Elias MD, MPH , Ibrahim Marai MD , Alon Eyal MD, PhD , Wisam Darawsha MD , Faheem Shehadeh MD , Robert Glueck MD , Roy Beinart MD , Eyal Nof MD , Yoav Michowitz MD , Michael Glikson MD , Yuval Konstantino MD , Moti Haim MD , David Luria MD , Alexander Omelchenko MD , Avishag Laish-Farkash MD, PhD , Mahmoud Suleiman MD , Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon technology is widely used for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data on its effectiveness in patients with the left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) variant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to examine the outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with the LCPV variant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry is a prospective, multicenter cohort that included citizens who underwent PVI during the years 2019–2021. Study endpoints were acute isolation success of the pulmonary veins (PVs), AF recurrence, and the need for a repeat ablation procedure at 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 74 patients with the LCPV variant and 822 patients with standard PV anatomy. The acute isolation success rate of the LPVs was significantly lower in LCPV variant patients compared with those with a standard anatomy. However, there was no significant difference in the acute isolation success rate of the right PVs between the 2 groups. At 12 months, the rates of AF recurrence did not differ significantly between the LCPV variant group (17.6%) and the standard anatomy group (11.1%) (<em>P =</em> .09), and multivariable adjustment LCPV was not associated with AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.74). Similarly, the rate of repeat ablation for recurrent AF did not differ significantly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, we found that isolating the LCPV using cryoballoon PVI was more challenging than isolating standard anatomy. Despite this, the effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation in patients with LCPV anatomy did not differ significantly from that in the standard anatomy group.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 290-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left common pulmonary vein variant
Background
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon technology is widely used for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data on its effectiveness in patients with the left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) variant.
Objective
The study aimed to examine the outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with the LCPV variant.
Methods
The Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry is a prospective, multicenter cohort that included citizens who underwent PVI during the years 2019–2021. Study endpoints were acute isolation success of the pulmonary veins (PVs), AF recurrence, and the need for a repeat ablation procedure at 12 months.
Results
The study included 74 patients with the LCPV variant and 822 patients with standard PV anatomy. The acute isolation success rate of the LPVs was significantly lower in LCPV variant patients compared with those with a standard anatomy. However, there was no significant difference in the acute isolation success rate of the right PVs between the 2 groups. At 12 months, the rates of AF recurrence did not differ significantly between the LCPV variant group (17.6%) and the standard anatomy group (11.1%) (P = .09), and multivariable adjustment LCPV was not associated with AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.74). Similarly, the rate of repeat ablation for recurrent AF did not differ significantly.
Conclusion
In our study, we found that isolating the LCPV using cryoballoon PVI was more challenging than isolating standard anatomy. Despite this, the effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation in patients with LCPV anatomy did not differ significantly from that in the standard anatomy group.