基于EPIC的强化氨挥发预测:不同肥料的模型描述与测试

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Andrea Gozio , Matteo Longo , Miguel L. Cabrera , Roberto César Izaurralde , David E. Kissel , Barbara Lazzaro , Nicola Dal Ferro , Francesco Morari
{"title":"基于EPIC的强化氨挥发预测:不同肥料的模型描述与测试","authors":"Andrea Gozio ,&nbsp;Matteo Longo ,&nbsp;Miguel L. Cabrera ,&nbsp;Roberto César Izaurralde ,&nbsp;David E. Kissel ,&nbsp;Barbara Lazzaro ,&nbsp;Nicola Dal Ferro ,&nbsp;Francesco Morari","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2025.127616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biogeochemical models are promising cost-effective tools to evaluate ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization reduction strategies at large spatial scales provided they capture all the relevant processes that regulate universally the nitrogen (N) cycle in agroecosystems. This work aims to enhance the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model to improve its ability to simulate NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization from both organic and mineral N fertilizers in agricultural fields. Extant algorithms of NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in EPIC were replaced with a mechanistic submodel that, operating at hourly steps, effectively simulated NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization by capturing processes of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) adsorption, urea hydrolysis, soil pH-based partitioning of total ammoniacal N into NH<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and mass transfer. The new EPIC submodel was calibrated and validated using data from two different locations (Legnaro, NE Italy; Eatonton, Georgia, USA), including several combinations of fertilizer types and application methods in different pedo-climatic conditions. Results showed that the new submodel provided more accurate estimates of cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> loss than the original one (validated R² = 0.79 vs. 0.50, validated RMSE = 10.6 vs 17.8 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). Furthermore, the implementation now enables more accurate simulation of fertilizer types and management, incorporating the effect of fertilizer pH, depth and method of application, and infiltration of the liquid fraction. In conclusion, the updated EPIC reported here becomes an effective tool to evaluate and select best agricultural practices capable of reducing NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 127616"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced ammonia volatilization prediction with EPIC: Model description and testing of different fertilizers\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Gozio ,&nbsp;Matteo Longo ,&nbsp;Miguel L. Cabrera ,&nbsp;Roberto César Izaurralde ,&nbsp;David E. Kissel ,&nbsp;Barbara Lazzaro ,&nbsp;Nicola Dal Ferro ,&nbsp;Francesco Morari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2025.127616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biogeochemical models are promising cost-effective tools to evaluate ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization reduction strategies at large spatial scales provided they capture all the relevant processes that regulate universally the nitrogen (N) cycle in agroecosystems. This work aims to enhance the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model to improve its ability to simulate NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization from both organic and mineral N fertilizers in agricultural fields. Extant algorithms of NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in EPIC were replaced with a mechanistic submodel that, operating at hourly steps, effectively simulated NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization by capturing processes of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) adsorption, urea hydrolysis, soil pH-based partitioning of total ammoniacal N into NH<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and mass transfer. The new EPIC submodel was calibrated and validated using data from two different locations (Legnaro, NE Italy; Eatonton, Georgia, USA), including several combinations of fertilizer types and application methods in different pedo-climatic conditions. Results showed that the new submodel provided more accurate estimates of cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> loss than the original one (validated R² = 0.79 vs. 0.50, validated RMSE = 10.6 vs 17.8 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). Furthermore, the implementation now enables more accurate simulation of fertilizer types and management, incorporating the effect of fertilizer pH, depth and method of application, and infiltration of the liquid fraction. In conclusion, the updated EPIC reported here becomes an effective tool to evaluate and select best agricultural practices capable of reducing NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030125001121\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030125001121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果生物地球化学模型能够捕捉到农业生态系统中普遍调节氮循环的所有相关过程,那么它是在大空间尺度上评估氨(NH3)挥发减少策略的有希望的经济有效的工具。本工作旨在增强环境政策综合气候(EPIC)模型,以提高其模拟农田中有机和矿质氮肥NH3挥发的能力。现有的EPIC中NH3挥发算法被一个机械子模型所取代,该模型以小时为步长,通过捕获铵(NH4+)吸附、尿素水解、土壤ph将总氨态N分配为NH3和NH4+以及传质等过程,有效地模拟了NH3的挥发。新的EPIC子模型使用来自两个不同地点的数据进行校准和验证(意大利东北部的Legnaro;Eatonton, Georgia, USA),包括几种不同土壤气候条件下肥料类型和施用方法的组合。结果表明,与原始子模型相比,新子模型提供了更准确的累积NH3损失量估算(验证R²= 0.79 vs. 0.50,验证RMSE = 10.6 vs. 17.8 kg N ha−1)。此外,现在的实施可以更准确地模拟肥料类型和管理,包括肥料pH值、施用深度和方法以及液体部分的渗透。综上所述,本文报告的最新EPIC成为评估和选择能够减少NH3挥发的最佳农业实践的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced ammonia volatilization prediction with EPIC: Model description and testing of different fertilizers
Biogeochemical models are promising cost-effective tools to evaluate ammonia (NH3) volatilization reduction strategies at large spatial scales provided they capture all the relevant processes that regulate universally the nitrogen (N) cycle in agroecosystems. This work aims to enhance the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model to improve its ability to simulate NH3 volatilization from both organic and mineral N fertilizers in agricultural fields. Extant algorithms of NH3 volatilization in EPIC were replaced with a mechanistic submodel that, operating at hourly steps, effectively simulated NH3 volatilization by capturing processes of ammonium (NH4+) adsorption, urea hydrolysis, soil pH-based partitioning of total ammoniacal N into NH3 and NH4+, and mass transfer. The new EPIC submodel was calibrated and validated using data from two different locations (Legnaro, NE Italy; Eatonton, Georgia, USA), including several combinations of fertilizer types and application methods in different pedo-climatic conditions. Results showed that the new submodel provided more accurate estimates of cumulative NH3 loss than the original one (validated R² = 0.79 vs. 0.50, validated RMSE = 10.6 vs 17.8 kg N ha−1). Furthermore, the implementation now enables more accurate simulation of fertilizer types and management, incorporating the effect of fertilizer pH, depth and method of application, and infiltration of the liquid fraction. In conclusion, the updated EPIC reported here becomes an effective tool to evaluate and select best agricultural practices capable of reducing NH3 volatilization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信