传导系统起搏的无创心电图成像评估:一种评估室内同步性的新算法

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ivan Eltsov MD , Alvise Del Monte MD , Luigi Pannone MD , Ingrid Overeinder MD , Domenico Della Rocca MD, PhD , Roberto Scacciavillani MD , Frederik H. Verbrugge MD, PhD , Qingguo Zeng PhD , Gezim Bala MD, PhD , Andrea Maria Paparella MSc , Giacomo Talevi MSc , Erwin Stroker MD, PhD , Juan Sieira MD, PhD , Ali Gharaviri PhD , Andrea Sarkozy MD, PhD , Gian-Battista Chierchia MD, PhD , Mark La Meir MD, PhD , Carlo de Asmundis MD, PhD , Alexandre Almorad MD
{"title":"传导系统起搏的无创心电图成像评估:一种评估室内同步性的新算法","authors":"Ivan Eltsov MD ,&nbsp;Alvise Del Monte MD ,&nbsp;Luigi Pannone MD ,&nbsp;Ingrid Overeinder MD ,&nbsp;Domenico Della Rocca MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Scacciavillani MD ,&nbsp;Frederik H. Verbrugge MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Qingguo Zeng PhD ,&nbsp;Gezim Bala MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Maria Paparella MSc ,&nbsp;Giacomo Talevi MSc ,&nbsp;Erwin Stroker MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Juan Sieira MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ali Gharaviri PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Sarkozy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gian-Battista Chierchia MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mark La Meir MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo de Asmundis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandre Almorad MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compared with right ventricular apex pacing.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with an LBBAP device using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) and ECGI analyses have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, and V1–V6 activation delay were calculated using ECG. Total ventricular activation time, left ventricular activation time, intrinsic left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, intrinsic right ventricular activation time, and intraventricular dyssynchrony were calculated based on ECGI. All patients have been followed up to 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. The study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and left ventricular activation time) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between classic ECG parameters and ECGI analysis was identified. Two additional 12-lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found. Follow-up did not show any worsening of ejection fraction, paced QRS, or pacing parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison with intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined, and corresponding 12-lead parameters were also identified, which allows to predict ventricular activation by using 12-lead ECG only.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 329-338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging assessment of conduction system pacing: A novel algorithm to assess intraventricular synchrony\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Eltsov MD ,&nbsp;Alvise Del Monte MD ,&nbsp;Luigi Pannone MD ,&nbsp;Ingrid Overeinder MD ,&nbsp;Domenico Della Rocca MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Scacciavillani MD ,&nbsp;Frederik H. Verbrugge MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Qingguo Zeng PhD ,&nbsp;Gezim Bala MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Maria Paparella MSc ,&nbsp;Giacomo Talevi MSc ,&nbsp;Erwin Stroker MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Juan Sieira MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ali Gharaviri PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Sarkozy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gian-Battista Chierchia MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mark La Meir MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo de Asmundis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandre Almorad MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compared with right ventricular apex pacing.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with an LBBAP device using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) and ECGI analyses have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, and V1–V6 activation delay were calculated using ECG. Total ventricular activation time, left ventricular activation time, intrinsic left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, intrinsic right ventricular activation time, and intraventricular dyssynchrony were calculated based on ECGI. All patients have been followed up to 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. The study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and left ventricular activation time) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between classic ECG parameters and ECGI analysis was identified. Two additional 12-lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found. Follow-up did not show any worsening of ejection fraction, paced QRS, or pacing parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison with intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined, and corresponding 12-lead parameters were also identified, which allows to predict ventricular activation by using 12-lead ECG only.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 329-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824004136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景左束分支区起搏(LBBAP)已成为包括房室传导阻滞在内的各种适应症的首选程序,与右室心尖起搏相比,被认为是一种生理起搏方式。目的本研究的目的是利用心电图成像(ECGI)评估LBBAP装置患者的心室激活和同步性。方法连续25例患者行LBBAP植入术。植入后第一天进行心电图和ECGI分析。心电法计算原生QRS和节律QRS、左室激活时间、右室激活时间、V1-V6激活延迟。基于ECGI计算总心室激活时间、左心室激活时间、内在左心室激活时间、右心室激活时间、内在右心室激活时间和室内非同步化。所有患者随访12个月。结果所有患者均分为两组(宽QRS组和窄QRS组)。研究表明,对于最初狭窄的QRS组,起搏时的激活时间和同步性与原生组相当。在宽QRS组,这些参数明显改善。对于有节奏心律分析,经典心电图LBBAP参数(有节奏QRS和左心室激活时间)不足以正确评价有节奏心律的心室激活。发现经典心电图参数与ECGI分析不一致。另外发现两个12导联心电图参数预测ECGI测量。随访未见射血分数、起搏QRS或起搏参数恶化。结论心电成像对新型起搏方式的疗效评估具有重要价值,为准确判断起搏结果提供了更多的数据,包括详细的激活评估和与本征传导的比较。确定了确认适当心室激活的关键ECGI值,并确定了相应的12导联参数,这使得仅使用12导联心电图即可预测心室激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging assessment of conduction system pacing: A novel algorithm to assess intraventricular synchrony

Background

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compared with right ventricular apex pacing.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with an LBBAP device using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI).

Methods

A total of 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) and ECGI analyses have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, and V1–V6 activation delay were calculated using ECG. Total ventricular activation time, left ventricular activation time, intrinsic left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, intrinsic right ventricular activation time, and intraventricular dyssynchrony were calculated based on ECGI. All patients have been followed up to 12 months.

Results

All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. The study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and left ventricular activation time) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between classic ECG parameters and ECGI analysis was identified. Two additional 12-lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found. Follow-up did not show any worsening of ejection fraction, paced QRS, or pacing parameters.

Conclusion

ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison with intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined, and corresponding 12-lead parameters were also identified, which allows to predict ventricular activation by using 12-lead ECG only.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信