利用空间MCDA评估澳大利亚维多利亚州废弃矿山和采石场的再利用方案

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Shushil Giri , Oliver S. Holt , Grace Tully , Alec Miller , Mohan Yellishetty , David Whittle , Peter M. Bach
{"title":"利用空间MCDA评估澳大利亚维多利亚州废弃矿山和采石场的再利用方案","authors":"Shushil Giri ,&nbsp;Oliver S. Holt ,&nbsp;Grace Tully ,&nbsp;Alec Miller ,&nbsp;Mohan Yellishetty ,&nbsp;David Whittle ,&nbsp;Peter M. Bach","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Abandoned mines and quarries pose significant risks to communities and ecosystems worldwide. This study introduces a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework and uses it to evaluate and rank seven repurposing options for over 15,000 abandoned mines across Victoria, Australia. The application of the framework incorporates seven end-use options and fourteen different spatial indicators, derived from an extensive literature review of site suitability studies. The MCDA framework was applied to assess the suitability of various repurposing options based on spatial criteria relevant to each end-use. Key findings indicate that tourism, pumped hydropower, flood retention, and solar energy generation are the most favorable options across most regions of Victoria. The study also delineates relatively favourable locations for the overall low-scoring options like water supply, wastewater management and solid waste management. The framework is adaptable to include additional repurposing options and criteria, making it transferable to diverse regions globally. The research not only addresses the specific challenges faced by Victoria but also contributes to the understanding of sustainable abandoned mine rehabilitation on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108254"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing repurposing options for abandoned mines and quarries in Victoria, Australia using spatial MCDA\",\"authors\":\"Shushil Giri ,&nbsp;Oliver S. Holt ,&nbsp;Grace Tully ,&nbsp;Alec Miller ,&nbsp;Mohan Yellishetty ,&nbsp;David Whittle ,&nbsp;Peter M. Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Abandoned mines and quarries pose significant risks to communities and ecosystems worldwide. This study introduces a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework and uses it to evaluate and rank seven repurposing options for over 15,000 abandoned mines across Victoria, Australia. The application of the framework incorporates seven end-use options and fourteen different spatial indicators, derived from an extensive literature review of site suitability studies. The MCDA framework was applied to assess the suitability of various repurposing options based on spatial criteria relevant to each end-use. Key findings indicate that tourism, pumped hydropower, flood retention, and solar energy generation are the most favorable options across most regions of Victoria. The study also delineates relatively favourable locations for the overall low-scoring options like water supply, wastewater management and solid waste management. The framework is adaptable to include additional repurposing options and criteria, making it transferable to diverse regions globally. The research not only addresses the specific challenges faced by Victoria but also contributes to the understanding of sustainable abandoned mine rehabilitation on a global scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001338\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

废弃的矿山和采石场对世界各地的社区和生态系统构成重大风险。本研究引入了一个空间多标准决策分析(MCDA)框架,并使用它对澳大利亚维多利亚州15000多个废弃矿山的7个再利用方案进行了评估和排名。该框架的应用包括七个最终用途选择和十四个不同的空间指标,这些指标来自于对场地适宜性研究的广泛文献综述。根据与每个最终用途相关的空间标准,应用MCDA框架评估各种重新利用方案的适宜性。主要研究结果表明,旅游业、抽水蓄能、防洪和太阳能发电是维多利亚州大部分地区最有利的选择。该研究还为供水、废水管理和固体废物管理等总体得分较低的选择描绘了相对有利的地点。该框架可适应包括其他重新利用的选择和标准,使其可转移到全球不同区域。该研究不仅解决了维多利亚州面临的具体挑战,而且有助于了解全球范围内可持续的废弃矿山修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing repurposing options for abandoned mines and quarries in Victoria, Australia using spatial MCDA

Assessing repurposing options for abandoned mines and quarries in Victoria, Australia using spatial MCDA
Abandoned mines and quarries pose significant risks to communities and ecosystems worldwide. This study introduces a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework and uses it to evaluate and rank seven repurposing options for over 15,000 abandoned mines across Victoria, Australia. The application of the framework incorporates seven end-use options and fourteen different spatial indicators, derived from an extensive literature review of site suitability studies. The MCDA framework was applied to assess the suitability of various repurposing options based on spatial criteria relevant to each end-use. Key findings indicate that tourism, pumped hydropower, flood retention, and solar energy generation are the most favorable options across most regions of Victoria. The study also delineates relatively favourable locations for the overall low-scoring options like water supply, wastewater management and solid waste management. The framework is adaptable to include additional repurposing options and criteria, making it transferable to diverse regions globally. The research not only addresses the specific challenges faced by Victoria but also contributes to the understanding of sustainable abandoned mine rehabilitation on a global scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信