鱼体内的浓度比,它们的自然变化,以及缺失值的外推

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Peter Saetre , Olle Hjerne , Ari T.K. Ikonen , Lauri Parviainen , Ulrik Kautsky , Sari Peura
{"title":"鱼体内的浓度比,它们的自然变化,以及缺失值的外推","authors":"Peter Saetre ,&nbsp;Olle Hjerne ,&nbsp;Ari T.K. Ikonen ,&nbsp;Lauri Parviainen ,&nbsp;Ulrik Kautsky ,&nbsp;Sari Peura","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.</div><div>The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.</div><div>We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 107672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentration ratios in fish, their natural variation, and extrapolation of missing values\",\"authors\":\"Peter Saetre ,&nbsp;Olle Hjerne ,&nbsp;Ari T.K. Ikonen ,&nbsp;Lauri Parviainen ,&nbsp;Ulrik Kautsky ,&nbsp;Sari Peura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.</div><div>The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.</div><div>We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"volume\":\"285 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25000591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25000591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在环境影响评价中,为了计算放射性核素从水中向水生生物的转移,需要生物群与水的浓度比。数据经常丢失,特别是对于稀有元素,并且使用各种方法来推断丢失的值。在这项研究中,我们根据先前发表的咸淡水和淡水数据分析了鱼类中的元素浓度。我们根据鱼类的种类对它们进行分组,并使用混合线性模型来计算地点和生态系统特定的CR值。将这些值与不同外推方法(场地、文献、元素和生态系统类似物)的值进行比较。我们还计算了食用和全身的换算系数。在半咸淡水生态系统和淡水生态系统之间,特定地点的CR值经常相差一个数量级或更多。对于大多数元素,该值受场地,地点(场地内)和鱼类类型的影响。此外,骨的包含也影响了一些CR值。文献类似物与现场数据的差异大于现场类似物,但它们都比元素和生态系统类似物表现得更好。在咸淡水和淡水环境中,可食用和全身浓度之间的比例通常相似。我们的结论是,对相似地点的不同水生生态系统进行联合分析,可以对与CR相关的系统和随机变化进行可靠的估计。我们建议,可能的类似物比国际建议中考虑的更多,并且类似物的选择应基于现有数据和类似物在特定评估中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Concentration ratios in fish, their natural variation, and extrapolation of missing values

Concentration ratios in fish, their natural variation, and extrapolation of missing values
In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.
The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.
We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental radioactivity
Journal of environmental radioactivity 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Radioactivity provides a coherent international forum for publication of original research or review papers on any aspect of the occurrence of radioactivity in natural systems. Relevant subject areas range from applications of environmental radionuclides as mechanistic or timescale tracers of natural processes to assessments of the radioecological or radiological effects of ambient radioactivity. Papers deal with naturally occurring nuclides or with those created and released by man through nuclear weapons manufacture and testing, energy production, fuel-cycle technology, etc. Reports on radioactivity in the oceans, sediments, rivers, lakes, groundwaters, soils, atmosphere and all divisions of the biosphere are welcomed, but these should not simply be of a monitoring nature unless the data are particularly innovative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信