Peter Saetre , Olle Hjerne , Ari T.K. Ikonen , Lauri Parviainen , Ulrik Kautsky , Sari Peura
{"title":"鱼体内的浓度比,它们的自然变化,以及缺失值的外推","authors":"Peter Saetre , Olle Hjerne , Ari T.K. Ikonen , Lauri Parviainen , Ulrik Kautsky , Sari Peura","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.</div><div>The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.</div><div>We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 107672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentration ratios in fish, their natural variation, and extrapolation of missing values\",\"authors\":\"Peter Saetre , Olle Hjerne , Ari T.K. Ikonen , Lauri Parviainen , Ulrik Kautsky , Sari Peura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.</div><div>The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.</div><div>We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"volume\":\"285 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25000591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25000591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concentration ratios in fish, their natural variation, and extrapolation of missing values
In environmental impact assessments the biota-to-water concentration ratio (CR) is needed for calculating the transfer of radionuclides from water to aquatic organisms. Data are frequently missing, especially for rare elements, and various approaches are used for extrapolation of missing values. In this study we have analysed elemental concentrations in fish based on previously published data for brackish and freshwater. We grouped the fish according to their species and used a mixed linear model to calculate site- and ecosystem-specific CR values. These values were compared with values from different extrapolation methods (site, literature, element and ecosystem analogues). We also calculated edible versus whole body conversion factors.
The site-specific CR values frequently differed by an order of magnitude or more between the brackish and freshwater ecosystems. For most elements the value was affected by site, locality (within site) and fish type. Also the inclusion of bones affected some CR values. Literature analogues diverged more from the site data than site analogues, but these both performed better than element and ecosystem analogues. The ratio between edible and whole-body concentrations was typically similar in brackish and freshwater environments.
We conclude that a joint analysis of different aquatic ecosystems at similar sites allows for robust estimates of systematic and random variation associated with CR. We suggest that there are more possible analogues than the ones considered in the international recommendations, and that the choice of analogue should be based on the available data and the performance of the analogues in the specific assessment at hand.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Radioactivity provides a coherent international forum for publication of original research or review papers on any aspect of the occurrence of radioactivity in natural systems.
Relevant subject areas range from applications of environmental radionuclides as mechanistic or timescale tracers of natural processes to assessments of the radioecological or radiological effects of ambient radioactivity. Papers deal with naturally occurring nuclides or with those created and released by man through nuclear weapons manufacture and testing, energy production, fuel-cycle technology, etc. Reports on radioactivity in the oceans, sediments, rivers, lakes, groundwaters, soils, atmosphere and all divisions of the biosphere are welcomed, but these should not simply be of a monitoring nature unless the data are particularly innovative.