综合生态风险时空变化及其对植被恢复的响应:基于外部风险源-结构-功能框架的量化

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ping Yu , Ling Zhang , Dan Xia
{"title":"综合生态风险时空变化及其对植被恢复的响应:基于外部风险源-结构-功能框架的量化","authors":"Ping Yu ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Dan Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehensive ecological risk (CER) assessment under the interference of climate change and human activities is essential for the high-quality utilization of resources and the sustainable development of ecosystems. In this study, a CER assessment framework was developed by combining natural and human external risk sources, ecosystem structure vulnerability (ESV), and ecosystem function (EF). Then, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity risk mitigation effects of vegetation restoration were discussed. Finally, an effective risk management scheme was proposed according to the risk heterogeneity of different major function-oriented zones (MFOZs). The results were as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, both the overall CER within the basin and the CER in various MFOZs exhibited a significant decrease, with the largest reduction observed in the number of high CER zones in the optimize development zones. (2) The most significant reduction in CER due to vegetation restoration is observed in the ecological functional zones of Shaanxi and Shanxi. (3) The relative contribution of accessibility, geography, climate, and economic on high CER varies significantly across different MFOZs. (4) For high risk of optimized development zones, ecological restoration should be prioritized, with strict controls on urban expansion. The results of this study should be considered account when formulating targeted ecological risk control policies to achieve sustainable development of ecological environments in different urban MFOZs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal changes and response to vegetation restoration of comprehensive ecological risk: Quantification using the external risk source-structure-function framework\",\"authors\":\"Ping Yu ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Dan Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Comprehensive ecological risk (CER) assessment under the interference of climate change and human activities is essential for the high-quality utilization of resources and the sustainable development of ecosystems. In this study, a CER assessment framework was developed by combining natural and human external risk sources, ecosystem structure vulnerability (ESV), and ecosystem function (EF). Then, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity risk mitigation effects of vegetation restoration were discussed. Finally, an effective risk management scheme was proposed according to the risk heterogeneity of different major function-oriented zones (MFOZs). The results were as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, both the overall CER within the basin and the CER in various MFOZs exhibited a significant decrease, with the largest reduction observed in the number of high CER zones in the optimize development zones. (2) The most significant reduction in CER due to vegetation restoration is observed in the ecological functional zones of Shaanxi and Shanxi. (3) The relative contribution of accessibility, geography, climate, and economic on high CER varies significantly across different MFOZs. (4) For high risk of optimized development zones, ecological restoration should be prioritized, with strict controls on urban expansion. The results of this study should be considered account when formulating targeted ecological risk control policies to achieve sustainable development of ecological environments in different urban MFOZs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500093X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500093X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化和人类活动干扰下的生态风险综合评价是资源高质量利用和生态系统可持续发展的重要内容。本研究将自然和人为外部风险源、生态系统结构脆弱性(ESV)和生态系统功能(EF)相结合,构建了生态系统风险评估框架。在此基础上,探讨了植被恢复的时空异质性风险缓解效果。最后,根据不同主体功能区的风险异质性,提出了有效的风险管理方案。结果表明:(1)2000 - 2020年,流域内总体CER和各主产区CER均呈现显著下降趋势,其中优化开发区CER高区数量下降幅度最大;(2)植被恢复导致的CER降低以陕西和山西生态功能区最为显著。(3)可达性、地理、气候和经济对高CER的相对贡献在不同区域间差异显著。(4)对于风险较高的优化开发区,应优先进行生态修复,严格控制城市扩张。在制定有针对性的生态风险控制政策时,应综合考虑上述研究结果,以实现不同城市中心控制区生态环境的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatiotemporal changes and response to vegetation restoration of comprehensive ecological risk: Quantification using the external risk source-structure-function framework
Comprehensive ecological risk (CER) assessment under the interference of climate change and human activities is essential for the high-quality utilization of resources and the sustainable development of ecosystems. In this study, a CER assessment framework was developed by combining natural and human external risk sources, ecosystem structure vulnerability (ESV), and ecosystem function (EF). Then, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity risk mitigation effects of vegetation restoration were discussed. Finally, an effective risk management scheme was proposed according to the risk heterogeneity of different major function-oriented zones (MFOZs). The results were as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, both the overall CER within the basin and the CER in various MFOZs exhibited a significant decrease, with the largest reduction observed in the number of high CER zones in the optimize development zones. (2) The most significant reduction in CER due to vegetation restoration is observed in the ecological functional zones of Shaanxi and Shanxi. (3) The relative contribution of accessibility, geography, climate, and economic on high CER varies significantly across different MFOZs. (4) For high risk of optimized development zones, ecological restoration should be prioritized, with strict controls on urban expansion. The results of this study should be considered account when formulating targeted ecological risk control policies to achieve sustainable development of ecological environments in different urban MFOZs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信