防止苍蝇停车的交通标志的有效性

Alexandra Gavriilidou, Rolien Holster, Winnie Daamen
{"title":"防止苍蝇停车的交通标志的有效性","authors":"Alexandra Gavriilidou,&nbsp;Rolien Holster,&nbsp;Winnie Daamen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As bicycle use increases, so does the need for formal parking spaces to safely store them while performing other activities at a destination. In the Netherlands, several municipalities have created indoor and outdoor formal parking spaces, which remain underutilised. Instead, many cyclists choose to ‘fly park’, i.e. informally lock their bicycle to objects on the street. This can cause dangerous situations or inconvenience, for example by blocking sidewalks. The discrepancy between the use of formal and informal parking spaces may be attributed to a lack of information provided to cyclists about the available formal parking options. This study investigated the effectiveness of different traffic sign designs in encouraging the use of formal parking spaces. The designs were developed within this research with the intention of capturing different communication strategies, namely hazardous, neutral educative and negative educative. A stated preference choice experiment was then performed to allow the comparison of the effectiveness of the different designs, and thus communication strategies. The responses were analysed using discrete choice modelling. According to the results, traffic signs alerting users to the fact that controls are performed (hazardous communication) are the most effective in the fly parking prevention, especially for frequent bicycle users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of traffic signs to prevent fly parking\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Gavriilidou,&nbsp;Rolien Holster,&nbsp;Winnie Daamen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As bicycle use increases, so does the need for formal parking spaces to safely store them while performing other activities at a destination. In the Netherlands, several municipalities have created indoor and outdoor formal parking spaces, which remain underutilised. Instead, many cyclists choose to ‘fly park’, i.e. informally lock their bicycle to objects on the street. This can cause dangerous situations or inconvenience, for example by blocking sidewalks. The discrepancy between the use of formal and informal parking spaces may be attributed to a lack of information provided to cyclists about the available formal parking options. This study investigated the effectiveness of different traffic sign designs in encouraging the use of formal parking spaces. The designs were developed within this research with the intention of capturing different communication strategies, namely hazardous, neutral educative and negative educative. A stated preference choice experiment was then performed to allow the comparison of the effectiveness of the different designs, and thus communication strategies. The responses were analysed using discrete choice modelling. According to the results, traffic signs alerting users to the fact that controls are performed (hazardous communication) are the most effective in the fly parking prevention, especially for frequent bicycle users.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295010592500004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295010592500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着自行车使用量的增加,在目的地进行其他活动时,也需要正式的停车位来安全地存放自行车。在荷兰,一些城市已经建立了室内和室外的正式停车位,但这些停车位仍未得到充分利用。相反,许多骑自行车的人选择“飞停”,即非正式地将自行车锁在街上的物体上。这可能会造成危险的情况或不便,例如堵塞人行道。正式和非正式停车位的使用差异可能是由于缺乏向骑自行车的人提供关于可用的正式停车选择的信息。本研究调查了不同交通标志设计在鼓励使用正式停车位方面的效果。这些设计是在本研究中开发的,旨在捕捉不同的沟通策略,即危险、中性教育和消极教育。然后进行了一个陈述偏好选择实验,以允许比较不同设计的有效性,从而交流策略。使用离散选择模型对响应进行了分析。结果表明,交通标志提醒用户进行控制(危险通信)是预防苍蝇停车最有效的方法,特别是对于经常骑自行车的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of traffic signs to prevent fly parking
As bicycle use increases, so does the need for formal parking spaces to safely store them while performing other activities at a destination. In the Netherlands, several municipalities have created indoor and outdoor formal parking spaces, which remain underutilised. Instead, many cyclists choose to ‘fly park’, i.e. informally lock their bicycle to objects on the street. This can cause dangerous situations or inconvenience, for example by blocking sidewalks. The discrepancy between the use of formal and informal parking spaces may be attributed to a lack of information provided to cyclists about the available formal parking options. This study investigated the effectiveness of different traffic sign designs in encouraging the use of formal parking spaces. The designs were developed within this research with the intention of capturing different communication strategies, namely hazardous, neutral educative and negative educative. A stated preference choice experiment was then performed to allow the comparison of the effectiveness of the different designs, and thus communication strategies. The responses were analysed using discrete choice modelling. According to the results, traffic signs alerting users to the fact that controls are performed (hazardous communication) are the most effective in the fly parking prevention, especially for frequent bicycle users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信