初级保健小组对家中有姑息治疗需求的患者进行主动监测:它能影响死亡地点吗?

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
C. Angulo García , T. Díaz Canales , L. Masiá Borrell , M. Merlo Loranca , A. Rodríguez Laso
{"title":"初级保健小组对家中有姑息治疗需求的患者进行主动监测:它能影响死亡地点吗?","authors":"C. Angulo García ,&nbsp;T. Díaz Canales ,&nbsp;L. Masiá Borrell ,&nbsp;M. Merlo Loranca ,&nbsp;A. Rodríguez Laso","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether proactive follow-up by Primary Care teams for patients attended by Home Palliative Care Support Teams influences the place of death for patients with advanced chronic illness. Additionally, to examine whether this association is affected by the patient's complexity.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 422 patients attended by a home palliative care support team in Madrid in 2023. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical data, resource consumption, and preferences regarding the place of death. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with the place of death (home or outside: hospital or palliative care unit).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While 63% of patients expressed a preference to die at home, only 32.7% did so. Personal and family preferences emerged as the most decisive factors determining the place of death. Proactive follow-up was associated with a lower likelihood of dying at home after adjusting for family preferences, patient complexity, and functionality (Odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.59). Patients with non-oncological conditions and low scores in functionality indices were more likely to die at home.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Joint follow-up between Primary Care and home palliative care support team increases the probability of dying outside the home, contrary to what is reported in the literature. However, this association may reflect the inability to provide adequate home care rather than being the cause of the place of death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53212,"journal":{"name":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 102476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seguimiento proactivo por los equipos de Atención Primaria en los pacientes con necesidades paliativas en domicilio: ¿puede condicionar el lugar de fallecimiento?\",\"authors\":\"C. Angulo García ,&nbsp;T. Díaz Canales ,&nbsp;L. Masiá Borrell ,&nbsp;M. Merlo Loranca ,&nbsp;A. Rodríguez Laso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether proactive follow-up by Primary Care teams for patients attended by Home Palliative Care Support Teams influences the place of death for patients with advanced chronic illness. Additionally, to examine whether this association is affected by the patient's complexity.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 422 patients attended by a home palliative care support team in Madrid in 2023. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical data, resource consumption, and preferences regarding the place of death. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with the place of death (home or outside: hospital or palliative care unit).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While 63% of patients expressed a preference to die at home, only 32.7% did so. Personal and family preferences emerged as the most decisive factors determining the place of death. Proactive follow-up was associated with a lower likelihood of dying at home after adjusting for family preferences, patient complexity, and functionality (Odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.59). Patients with non-oncological conditions and low scores in functionality indices were more likely to die at home.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Joint follow-up between Primary Care and home palliative care support team increases the probability of dying outside the home, contrary to what is reported in the literature. However, this association may reflect the inability to provide adequate home care rather than being the cause of the place of death.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价初级保健团队对家庭姑息治疗支持团队就诊患者的积极随访是否影响晚期慢性疾病患者的死亡地点。此外,检查这种关联是否受到患者复杂性的影响。材料与方法对马德里家庭姑息治疗支持团队于2023年就诊的422例患者进行了一项分析性、观察性、回顾性队列研究。变量包括社会人口学和临床数据、资源消耗和对死亡地点的偏好。使用双变量和多变量logistic回归来确定与死亡地点(家中或外部:医院或姑息治疗单位)相关的因素。结果63%的患者表示希望在家中死亡,但只有32.7%的患者这样做。个人和家庭偏好成为决定死亡地点的最决定性因素。在调整了家庭偏好、患者复杂性和功能后,积极随访与较低的在家死亡可能性相关(优势比:0.26;95%置信区间:0.11-0.59)。非肿瘤性疾病和功能指数得分较低的患者更有可能在家中死亡。结论与文献报道相反,初级保健和家庭姑息治疗支持团队的联合随访增加了在家外死亡的可能性。然而,这种联系可能反映了无法提供适当的家庭护理,而不是死亡地点的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seguimiento proactivo por los equipos de Atención Primaria en los pacientes con necesidades paliativas en domicilio: ¿puede condicionar el lugar de fallecimiento?

Objective

To evaluate whether proactive follow-up by Primary Care teams for patients attended by Home Palliative Care Support Teams influences the place of death for patients with advanced chronic illness. Additionally, to examine whether this association is affected by the patient's complexity.

Material and methods

An analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 422 patients attended by a home palliative care support team in Madrid in 2023. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical data, resource consumption, and preferences regarding the place of death. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with the place of death (home or outside: hospital or palliative care unit).

Results

While 63% of patients expressed a preference to die at home, only 32.7% did so. Personal and family preferences emerged as the most decisive factors determining the place of death. Proactive follow-up was associated with a lower likelihood of dying at home after adjusting for family preferences, patient complexity, and functionality (Odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.59). Patients with non-oncological conditions and low scores in functionality indices were more likely to die at home.

Conclusions

Joint follow-up between Primary Care and home palliative care support team increases the probability of dying outside the home, contrary to what is reported in the literature. However, this association may reflect the inability to provide adequate home care rather than being the cause of the place of death.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
39 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信