双曲率索穹顶风致压力分布的CFD模拟:几何参数的影响

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Elshaimaa A. Ahmed , Hamid Montazeri , Ashraf A. El Damatty
{"title":"双曲率索穹顶风致压力分布的CFD模拟:几何参数的影响","authors":"Elshaimaa A. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Hamid Montazeri ,&nbsp;Ashraf A. El Damatty","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Double-curvature cable domes exhibit superior stability and rigidity compared to their positive-curvature counterparts. However, their inherent flexibility and lightweight nature make them highly sensitive to wind loads. Given the absence of clear regulations in existing design codes for such innovative structures, this study aims to investigate the impact of three geometrical parameters on wind-induced mean and peak pressures on these roofs: (i) cable and strut arrangement, (ii) structure height, and (iii) saddle-shaped roof curvature. The evaluations are based on high-fidelity Scale-Adaptive Simulations (SAS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The results of mean pressure coefficient show minimal effect from variations in cable and strut arrangement, whereas significant sensitivity is observed in both structure height and roof curvature. Specifically, reducing the structure height from 0.4 to 0.1 of the dome span results in a 0.38 decrease in the negative wind pressure coefficient, while changing the saddle roof height from 0.25 to 0.1 of the span leads to a reduction of 1.5 in the negative wind pressure coefficient at the middle of the roof and an increase of 0.4 at the leading edge. A comparison with the design peak pressure coefficient specified in CNR-DT 207/2018 for hyperbolic-paraboloid roofs shows an underestimation of suction at several locations, with a maximum deviation of 1.5.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 106087"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CFD simulations of the wind-induced pressure distribution on double-curvature cable domes: Impact of geometrical parameters\",\"authors\":\"Elshaimaa A. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Hamid Montazeri ,&nbsp;Ashraf A. El Damatty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Double-curvature cable domes exhibit superior stability and rigidity compared to their positive-curvature counterparts. However, their inherent flexibility and lightweight nature make them highly sensitive to wind loads. Given the absence of clear regulations in existing design codes for such innovative structures, this study aims to investigate the impact of three geometrical parameters on wind-induced mean and peak pressures on these roofs: (i) cable and strut arrangement, (ii) structure height, and (iii) saddle-shaped roof curvature. The evaluations are based on high-fidelity Scale-Adaptive Simulations (SAS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The results of mean pressure coefficient show minimal effect from variations in cable and strut arrangement, whereas significant sensitivity is observed in both structure height and roof curvature. Specifically, reducing the structure height from 0.4 to 0.1 of the dome span results in a 0.38 decrease in the negative wind pressure coefficient, while changing the saddle roof height from 0.25 to 0.1 of the span leads to a reduction of 1.5 in the negative wind pressure coefficient at the middle of the roof and an increase of 0.4 at the leading edge. A comparison with the design peak pressure coefficient specified in CNR-DT 207/2018 for hyperbolic-paraboloid roofs shows an underestimation of suction at several locations, with a maximum deviation of 1.5.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与正曲率电缆圆顶相比,双曲率电缆圆顶具有优越的稳定性和刚度。然而,它们固有的灵活性和轻量化使它们对风荷载非常敏感。鉴于这种创新结构的现有设计规范中缺乏明确的规定,本研究旨在研究三个几何参数对这些屋顶的风致平均和峰值压力的影响:(i)缆索和支柱布置,(ii)结构高度,(iii)鞍形屋顶曲率。评估基于高保真比例自适应模拟(SAS)计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟。平均压力系数的结果显示,索和支杆布置的变化对结构的影响最小,而结构高度和顶板曲率的变化对结构的影响显著。其中,将结构高度从拱跨的0.4减小到0.1,负风压系数减小0.38;将鞍顶高度从拱跨的0.25减小到0.1,顶中部负风压系数减小1.5,前缘负风压系数增大0.4。与CNR-DT 207/2018中规定的双曲抛物面屋顶的设计峰值压力系数相比,在几个位置低估了吸力,最大偏差为1.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CFD simulations of the wind-induced pressure distribution on double-curvature cable domes: Impact of geometrical parameters
Double-curvature cable domes exhibit superior stability and rigidity compared to their positive-curvature counterparts. However, their inherent flexibility and lightweight nature make them highly sensitive to wind loads. Given the absence of clear regulations in existing design codes for such innovative structures, this study aims to investigate the impact of three geometrical parameters on wind-induced mean and peak pressures on these roofs: (i) cable and strut arrangement, (ii) structure height, and (iii) saddle-shaped roof curvature. The evaluations are based on high-fidelity Scale-Adaptive Simulations (SAS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The results of mean pressure coefficient show minimal effect from variations in cable and strut arrangement, whereas significant sensitivity is observed in both structure height and roof curvature. Specifically, reducing the structure height from 0.4 to 0.1 of the dome span results in a 0.38 decrease in the negative wind pressure coefficient, while changing the saddle roof height from 0.25 to 0.1 of the span leads to a reduction of 1.5 in the negative wind pressure coefficient at the middle of the roof and an increase of 0.4 at the leading edge. A comparison with the design peak pressure coefficient specified in CNR-DT 207/2018 for hyperbolic-paraboloid roofs shows an underestimation of suction at several locations, with a maximum deviation of 1.5.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信