Zongqi Peng , Yanhui Zhu , Kun Yang , Yi Luo , Xixi Lu , Jiasheng Wang , Yang Zhang , Danni Su , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Jingcong Ma , Yang Liu , Mengzhu Sun
{"title":"大湄公河次区域次生林的恢复努力抵消原始森林的碳损失","authors":"Zongqi Peng , Yanhui Zhu , Kun Yang , Yi Luo , Xixi Lu , Jiasheng Wang , Yang Zhang , Danni Su , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Jingcong Ma , Yang Liu , Mengzhu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) is experiencing significant changes in forest area, prompting an urgent investigation into whether the alterations in carbon stock from forest loss and restoration can meet the region's need for increased carbon sequestration. Therefore, utilizing remote sensing data such as Landsat and machine learning methods, we established distribution maps of primary and secondary forests and forest carbon density maps for the GMS from 2000 to 2020. By analyzing the gradient effect of forest carbon density across four altitude zones, we investigated the altitude asymmetry of the compensatory effect of secondary forests in the GMS, and predicted the carbon potential of the regional forests. The results indicate that, influenced by human activities, forests in the GMS have transitioned from the loss of primary forests in the 2000s to the recovery of secondary forests in the 2010s. While the rates of area change for loss (−2.22 × 10<sup>5</sup> ha yr<sup>−1</sup>) and recovery (1.97 × 10<sup>5</sup> ha yr<sup>−1</sup>) were similar, an altitude asymmetry caused a regional forest carbon imbalance. The low and mid-altitude regions, with higher carbon density and significant forest loss, can only compensate for 31.50 % of the carbon loss in low-altitude (122.28 TgC) and 47.57 % in mid-altitude (76.25 TgC) through secondary forest recovery. In contrast, the high-altitude region, with lower carbon loss (12.93 TgC) and larger recovery area, results in a forest net carbon sink of 10.66 TgC. Over the next decade, if primary forest loss continues at the current pace, existing secondary forest growth will absorb only 50.41 % of carbon emissions. Therefore, collaboration among GMS countries is essential to protect primary forests and promote secondary forest planting in low to mid-altitude areas for sustainable regional forest carbon development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 104796"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoration of secondary forest in the Greater Mekong Subregion struggles to offset primary forest carbon losses\",\"authors\":\"Zongqi Peng , Yanhui Zhu , Kun Yang , Yi Luo , Xixi Lu , Jiasheng Wang , Yang Zhang , Danni Su , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Jingcong Ma , Yang Liu , Mengzhu Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) is experiencing significant changes in forest area, prompting an urgent investigation into whether the alterations in carbon stock from forest loss and restoration can meet the region's need for increased carbon sequestration. Therefore, utilizing remote sensing data such as Landsat and machine learning methods, we established distribution maps of primary and secondary forests and forest carbon density maps for the GMS from 2000 to 2020. By analyzing the gradient effect of forest carbon density across four altitude zones, we investigated the altitude asymmetry of the compensatory effect of secondary forests in the GMS, and predicted the carbon potential of the regional forests. The results indicate that, influenced by human activities, forests in the GMS have transitioned from the loss of primary forests in the 2000s to the recovery of secondary forests in the 2010s. While the rates of area change for loss (−2.22 × 10<sup>5</sup> ha yr<sup>−1</sup>) and recovery (1.97 × 10<sup>5</sup> ha yr<sup>−1</sup>) were similar, an altitude asymmetry caused a regional forest carbon imbalance. The low and mid-altitude regions, with higher carbon density and significant forest loss, can only compensate for 31.50 % of the carbon loss in low-altitude (122.28 TgC) and 47.57 % in mid-altitude (76.25 TgC) through secondary forest recovery. In contrast, the high-altitude region, with lower carbon loss (12.93 TgC) and larger recovery area, results in a forest net carbon sink of 10.66 TgC. Over the next decade, if primary forest loss continues at the current pace, existing secondary forest growth will absorb only 50.41 % of carbon emissions. Therefore, collaboration among GMS countries is essential to protect primary forests and promote secondary forest planting in low to mid-altitude areas for sustainable regional forest carbon development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"volume\":\"249 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001055\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大湄公河次区域(GMS)的森林面积正在发生重大变化,迫切需要调查森林损失和恢复带来的碳储量变化是否能满足该地区增加碳封存的需求。为此,利用Landsat等遥感数据和机器学习方法,建立了2000 - 2020年GMS原生林、次生林分布图和森林碳密度图。通过对森林碳密度梯度效应的分析,探讨了GMS次生林补偿效应的海拔不对称性,并对区域森林碳潜力进行了预测。结果表明,在人类活动的影响下,GMS森林经历了从2000年代的原生林消失到2010年代的次生林恢复的转变。虽然森林损失(- 2.22 × 105 ha yr - 1)和恢复(1.97 × 105 ha yr - 1)的面积变化率相似,但海拔不对称导致区域森林碳不平衡。低、中海拔地区碳密度较高,森林损失显著,但通过次生林恢复只能补偿低海拔地区碳损失的31.50% (122.28 TgC)和中海拔地区47.57% (76.25 TgC)。高海拔地区碳损失较小(12.93 TgC),恢复面积较大,森林净碳汇为10.66 TgC。未来十年,如果原生林以目前的速度继续减少,现有次生林的生长将只能吸收50.41%的碳排放。因此,GMS国家之间的合作对于保护中低海拔地区的原生林和促进次生林种植至关重要,以实现区域森林碳的可持续发展。
Restoration of secondary forest in the Greater Mekong Subregion struggles to offset primary forest carbon losses
The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) is experiencing significant changes in forest area, prompting an urgent investigation into whether the alterations in carbon stock from forest loss and restoration can meet the region's need for increased carbon sequestration. Therefore, utilizing remote sensing data such as Landsat and machine learning methods, we established distribution maps of primary and secondary forests and forest carbon density maps for the GMS from 2000 to 2020. By analyzing the gradient effect of forest carbon density across four altitude zones, we investigated the altitude asymmetry of the compensatory effect of secondary forests in the GMS, and predicted the carbon potential of the regional forests. The results indicate that, influenced by human activities, forests in the GMS have transitioned from the loss of primary forests in the 2000s to the recovery of secondary forests in the 2010s. While the rates of area change for loss (−2.22 × 105 ha yr−1) and recovery (1.97 × 105 ha yr−1) were similar, an altitude asymmetry caused a regional forest carbon imbalance. The low and mid-altitude regions, with higher carbon density and significant forest loss, can only compensate for 31.50 % of the carbon loss in low-altitude (122.28 TgC) and 47.57 % in mid-altitude (76.25 TgC) through secondary forest recovery. In contrast, the high-altitude region, with lower carbon loss (12.93 TgC) and larger recovery area, results in a forest net carbon sink of 10.66 TgC. Over the next decade, if primary forest loss continues at the current pace, existing secondary forest growth will absorb only 50.41 % of carbon emissions. Therefore, collaboration among GMS countries is essential to protect primary forests and promote secondary forest planting in low to mid-altitude areas for sustainable regional forest carbon development.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems.
Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged.
Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.