重新思考清洁烹饪解决方案:评估尼泊尔补贴和分配方式对改进炉灶项目的影响

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sunil Prasad Lohani , Rosy Pradhan Shrestha , Mandip Shrestha , Henna Rinta-Kiikka , Jarkko Tissari
{"title":"重新思考清洁烹饪解决方案:评估尼泊尔补贴和分配方式对改进炉灶项目的影响","authors":"Sunil Prasad Lohani ,&nbsp;Rosy Pradhan Shrestha ,&nbsp;Mandip Shrestha ,&nbsp;Henna Rinta-Kiikka ,&nbsp;Jarkko Tissari","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clean cooking intervention and sustained use of them are crucial in achieving several sustainable development goals (SDG) including SDG 3, 7 and 13. This study aims to examine the impact of subsidy and distribution modality and sustainability of improved cook stove program (ICS) through retrospective assessments. The ICS distributed was an upgrade over inefficient traditional stoves, with a thermal efficiency of approximately 27 %, nearly twice the 15 % efficiency for the traditional stove. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative elements to comprehensively evaluate the government-financed improved cook stove program in two rural municipalities of Nepal. This study uncovers the nuances of the ICS in study areas and reveal significant discrepancies between the intended outcomes of interventions and the actual practices and preferences of end-users. The results show that, although stoves are provided free of cost, sustained use was not ensured. Surprisingly, approximately 35 % of the end-users had exchanged their stoves for onions, especially those with low income. However, 22 % of the participants mentioned that they use the stove occasionally, particularly during rainy season and festivals. The adoption of the improved cookstove is ultimately determined by preference of the cookstove user. The study findings emphasized the needs of end-users' requirement while selecting the clean cooking options for better intervention outcomes. Nepal as a case study, the research contributes to the global discourse on clean cooking interventions, offering insights applicable to other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges. The findings of this study should inform policy and practice in diverse contexts and should encourage relevant stakeholders and policy makers to reevaluate their policies and program related with clean cooking intervention in Nepal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking clean cooking solutions: Assessing the impact of subsidy and distribution modality on improved cook stove programs in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Prasad Lohani ,&nbsp;Rosy Pradhan Shrestha ,&nbsp;Mandip Shrestha ,&nbsp;Henna Rinta-Kiikka ,&nbsp;Jarkko Tissari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Clean cooking intervention and sustained use of them are crucial in achieving several sustainable development goals (SDG) including SDG 3, 7 and 13. This study aims to examine the impact of subsidy and distribution modality and sustainability of improved cook stove program (ICS) through retrospective assessments. The ICS distributed was an upgrade over inefficient traditional stoves, with a thermal efficiency of approximately 27 %, nearly twice the 15 % efficiency for the traditional stove. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative elements to comprehensively evaluate the government-financed improved cook stove program in two rural municipalities of Nepal. This study uncovers the nuances of the ICS in study areas and reveal significant discrepancies between the intended outcomes of interventions and the actual practices and preferences of end-users. The results show that, although stoves are provided free of cost, sustained use was not ensured. Surprisingly, approximately 35 % of the end-users had exchanged their stoves for onions, especially those with low income. However, 22 % of the participants mentioned that they use the stove occasionally, particularly during rainy season and festivals. The adoption of the improved cookstove is ultimately determined by preference of the cookstove user. The study findings emphasized the needs of end-users' requirement while selecting the clean cooking options for better intervention outcomes. Nepal as a case study, the research contributes to the global discourse on clean cooking interventions, offering insights applicable to other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges. The findings of this study should inform policy and practice in diverse contexts and should encourage relevant stakeholders and policy makers to reevaluate their policies and program related with clean cooking intervention in Nepal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

清洁烹饪干预措施和持续使用对实现包括可持续发展目标3、7和13在内的若干可持续发展目标至关重要。本研究旨在透过回溯性评估,检视补助与分配方式对改良炉灶计划(ICS)可持续性的影响。分配的ICS是对效率低下的传统炉子的升级,热效率约为27%,几乎是传统炉子15%效率的两倍。本研究采用混合方法,结合定性和定量因素,全面评估尼泊尔两个农村城市政府资助的改进炉灶项目。本研究揭示了ICS在研究领域的细微差别,并揭示了干预措施的预期结果与最终用户的实际做法和偏好之间的重大差异。结果表明,虽然炉具是免费提供的,但不能保证持续使用。令人惊讶的是,大约35%的终端用户将他们的炉灶换成了洋葱,尤其是那些低收入的用户。然而,22%的参与者提到他们偶尔使用炉子,特别是在雨季和节日期间。采用改进的炉灶最终取决于炉灶用户的偏好。研究结果强调了最终用户的需求,同时选择清洁烹饪选项以获得更好的干预结果。该研究以尼泊尔为例,促进了关于清洁烹饪干预措施的全球讨论,提供了适用于其他面临类似挑战的低收入和中等收入国家的见解。这项研究的结果应该为不同背景下的政策和实践提供信息,并鼓励相关利益相关者和政策制定者重新评估他们与尼泊尔清洁烹饪干预相关的政策和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking clean cooking solutions: Assessing the impact of subsidy and distribution modality on improved cook stove programs in Nepal
Clean cooking intervention and sustained use of them are crucial in achieving several sustainable development goals (SDG) including SDG 3, 7 and 13. This study aims to examine the impact of subsidy and distribution modality and sustainability of improved cook stove program (ICS) through retrospective assessments. The ICS distributed was an upgrade over inefficient traditional stoves, with a thermal efficiency of approximately 27 %, nearly twice the 15 % efficiency for the traditional stove. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative elements to comprehensively evaluate the government-financed improved cook stove program in two rural municipalities of Nepal. This study uncovers the nuances of the ICS in study areas and reveal significant discrepancies between the intended outcomes of interventions and the actual practices and preferences of end-users. The results show that, although stoves are provided free of cost, sustained use was not ensured. Surprisingly, approximately 35 % of the end-users had exchanged their stoves for onions, especially those with low income. However, 22 % of the participants mentioned that they use the stove occasionally, particularly during rainy season and festivals. The adoption of the improved cookstove is ultimately determined by preference of the cookstove user. The study findings emphasized the needs of end-users' requirement while selecting the clean cooking options for better intervention outcomes. Nepal as a case study, the research contributes to the global discourse on clean cooking interventions, offering insights applicable to other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges. The findings of this study should inform policy and practice in diverse contexts and should encourage relevant stakeholders and policy makers to reevaluate their policies and program related with clean cooking intervention in Nepal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信