最近几种微波辅助消化方法的绿度评价:用AGREEprep进行评价

IF 6.5 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Juan L. Benedé , Francisco Pena-Pereira
{"title":"最近几种微波辅助消化方法的绿度评价:用AGREEprep进行评价","authors":"Juan L. Benedé ,&nbsp;Francisco Pena-Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microwave-assisted digestion (MAD) is a widely used technique for the preparation of samples for elemental analysis. Significant advances toward more efficient and less hazardous MAD methods have been described in recent years, even though no systematic evaluation has been carried out in terms of green sample preparation. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and environmental impact of recent MAD methods through the lens of AGREEprep, a recognized metric tool that identifies the greenness attributes of sample preparation methods. The metric tool was employed for the assessment of 38 decomposition methods for food analysis, including MAD methods involving decreasing amounts of oxidizing agents, considering supplemental reagents and assistances, such as oxygen pressure, hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet irradiation, and microwave-induced combustion. In addition, conventional decomposition methods and alternative approaches involving infrared heating have been considered in the assessment. The 38 methods received overall scores in a wide range of 0.14 to 0.52, being MAD methods without acid consumption and those involving combustion the greenest methods (scores from 0.40 to 0.52). By systematically evaluating key criteria, such as reagent usage, energy consumption, process safety, and waste generation, AGREEprep provides a comprehensive view of MAD methods that can contribute to further improvements toward more sustainable analytical practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the greenness of recent microwave-assisted digestion methods: An evaluation with AGREEprep\",\"authors\":\"Juan L. Benedé ,&nbsp;Francisco Pena-Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Microwave-assisted digestion (MAD) is a widely used technique for the preparation of samples for elemental analysis. Significant advances toward more efficient and less hazardous MAD methods have been described in recent years, even though no systematic evaluation has been carried out in terms of green sample preparation. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and environmental impact of recent MAD methods through the lens of AGREEprep, a recognized metric tool that identifies the greenness attributes of sample preparation methods. The metric tool was employed for the assessment of 38 decomposition methods for food analysis, including MAD methods involving decreasing amounts of oxidizing agents, considering supplemental reagents and assistances, such as oxygen pressure, hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet irradiation, and microwave-induced combustion. In addition, conventional decomposition methods and alternative approaches involving infrared heating have been considered in the assessment. The 38 methods received overall scores in a wide range of 0.14 to 0.52, being MAD methods without acid consumption and those involving combustion the greenest methods (scores from 0.40 to 0.52). By systematically evaluating key criteria, such as reagent usage, energy consumption, process safety, and waste generation, AGREEprep provides a comprehensive view of MAD methods that can contribute to further improvements toward more sustainable analytical practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微波辅助消解(MAD)是一种广泛应用于元素分析样品制备的技术。近年来,尽管在绿色样品制备方面没有进行系统的评估,但在更有效和更低危害的MAD方法方面取得了重大进展。目前的工作通过AGREEprep(一种识别样品制备方法的绿色属性的公认度量工具)的镜头来评估最近MAD方法的有效性和环境影响。该计量工具用于评估38种食品分析分解方法,包括减少氧化剂量的MAD方法,考虑补充试剂和辅助试剂,如氧压、过氧化氢、紫外线照射和微波诱导燃烧。此外,在评估中还考虑了传统的分解方法和涉及红外加热的替代方法。38种方法的总体得分在0.14到0.52之间,其中没有酸消耗的MAD方法和涉及燃烧的方法是最环保的方法(得分从0.40到0.52)。通过系统地评估关键标准,如试剂使用、能源消耗、过程安全性和废物产生,AGREEprep提供了MAD方法的全面视图,可以有助于进一步改进更可持续的分析实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On the greenness of recent microwave-assisted digestion methods: An evaluation with AGREEprep

On the greenness of recent microwave-assisted digestion methods: An evaluation with AGREEprep
Microwave-assisted digestion (MAD) is a widely used technique for the preparation of samples for elemental analysis. Significant advances toward more efficient and less hazardous MAD methods have been described in recent years, even though no systematic evaluation has been carried out in terms of green sample preparation. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and environmental impact of recent MAD methods through the lens of AGREEprep, a recognized metric tool that identifies the greenness attributes of sample preparation methods. The metric tool was employed for the assessment of 38 decomposition methods for food analysis, including MAD methods involving decreasing amounts of oxidizing agents, considering supplemental reagents and assistances, such as oxygen pressure, hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet irradiation, and microwave-induced combustion. In addition, conventional decomposition methods and alternative approaches involving infrared heating have been considered in the assessment. The 38 methods received overall scores in a wide range of 0.14 to 0.52, being MAD methods without acid consumption and those involving combustion the greenest methods (scores from 0.40 to 0.52). By systematically evaluating key criteria, such as reagent usage, energy consumption, process safety, and waste generation, AGREEprep provides a comprehensive view of MAD methods that can contribute to further improvements toward more sustainable analytical practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信