Christiane Schnee , Karine Laroucau , Morag Livingstone , Rachid Aaziz , Hanna Marti , David Longbottom , Nicole Borel
{"title":"跨欧洲实验室评估商业和内部实时PCR检测小反刍动物流产衣原体","authors":"Christiane Schnee , Karine Laroucau , Morag Livingstone , Rachid Aaziz , Hanna Marti , David Longbottom , Nicole Borel","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Chlamydia abortus</em> is a bacterial pathogen that causes enzootic abortion of ewes (EAE), a disease of sheep and goats with potential risks to human health. Accurate detection is essential for disease management and prevention. While serological tests have been widely used for herd screening, they are lacking in terms of sensitivity and specificity. PCR methods, particularly real-time PCR, are now preferred due to their improved sensitivity and accuracy for confirmation of clinical cases and for use in routine surveillance.</div><div>This study aimed to compare and evaluate the analytical parameters and diagnostic performance of two commercial PCR tests and four in-house PCR methods for their suitability for diagnosing EAE. Two of the in-house methods are based on the <em>omp</em>A gene, which is specifically used to detect <em>C. abortus</em> in ruminants. The other two tests target different genetic markers, that also allow the detection of avian <em>C. abortus</em> strains.</div><div>The study found that all PCR tests had a similar analytical sensitivity and were effective in identifying <em>C. abortus</em> in clinical samples, such as placentas, vaginal swabs and fetal organs especially in animals showing symptoms. However, detection in asymptomatic carriers was more difficult. One of the <em>omp</em>A-based assays showed superior diagnostic accuracy, particularly compared to the commercial kits, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.0 % and a diagnostic specificity of 96.6 % and is thus the one recommended for routine testing. The study also concluded that the interpretation criteria of the commercial kits should be reviewed to improve their reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 105613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-European laboratory evaluation of commercial and in-house real-time PCR assays for the detection of Chlamydia abortus in small ruminants\",\"authors\":\"Christiane Schnee , Karine Laroucau , Morag Livingstone , Rachid Aaziz , Hanna Marti , David Longbottom , Nicole Borel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Chlamydia abortus</em> is a bacterial pathogen that causes enzootic abortion of ewes (EAE), a disease of sheep and goats with potential risks to human health. Accurate detection is essential for disease management and prevention. While serological tests have been widely used for herd screening, they are lacking in terms of sensitivity and specificity. PCR methods, particularly real-time PCR, are now preferred due to their improved sensitivity and accuracy for confirmation of clinical cases and for use in routine surveillance.</div><div>This study aimed to compare and evaluate the analytical parameters and diagnostic performance of two commercial PCR tests and four in-house PCR methods for their suitability for diagnosing EAE. Two of the in-house methods are based on the <em>omp</em>A gene, which is specifically used to detect <em>C. abortus</em> in ruminants. The other two tests target different genetic markers, that also allow the detection of avian <em>C. abortus</em> strains.</div><div>The study found that all PCR tests had a similar analytical sensitivity and were effective in identifying <em>C. abortus</em> in clinical samples, such as placentas, vaginal swabs and fetal organs especially in animals showing symptoms. However, detection in asymptomatic carriers was more difficult. One of the <em>omp</em>A-based assays showed superior diagnostic accuracy, particularly compared to the commercial kits, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.0 % and a diagnostic specificity of 96.6 % and is thus the one recommended for routine testing. The study also concluded that the interpretation criteria of the commercial kits should be reviewed to improve their reliability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-European laboratory evaluation of commercial and in-house real-time PCR assays for the detection of Chlamydia abortus in small ruminants
Chlamydia abortus is a bacterial pathogen that causes enzootic abortion of ewes (EAE), a disease of sheep and goats with potential risks to human health. Accurate detection is essential for disease management and prevention. While serological tests have been widely used for herd screening, they are lacking in terms of sensitivity and specificity. PCR methods, particularly real-time PCR, are now preferred due to their improved sensitivity and accuracy for confirmation of clinical cases and for use in routine surveillance.
This study aimed to compare and evaluate the analytical parameters and diagnostic performance of two commercial PCR tests and four in-house PCR methods for their suitability for diagnosing EAE. Two of the in-house methods are based on the ompA gene, which is specifically used to detect C. abortus in ruminants. The other two tests target different genetic markers, that also allow the detection of avian C. abortus strains.
The study found that all PCR tests had a similar analytical sensitivity and were effective in identifying C. abortus in clinical samples, such as placentas, vaginal swabs and fetal organs especially in animals showing symptoms. However, detection in asymptomatic carriers was more difficult. One of the ompA-based assays showed superior diagnostic accuracy, particularly compared to the commercial kits, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.0 % and a diagnostic specificity of 96.6 % and is thus the one recommended for routine testing. The study also concluded that the interpretation criteria of the commercial kits should be reviewed to improve their reliability.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.