医学专业的家庭和社区医学对选择专业的影响

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
J.A. Divisón Garrote , A. Castillo Sandoval , J.A. Carbayo Herencia , M. Simarro Rueda , E. Carrasco Carrasco , M. Guillén Pérez , A. Muros Ortega
{"title":"医学专业的家庭和社区医学对选择专业的影响","authors":"J.A. Divisón Garrote ,&nbsp;A. Castillo Sandoval ,&nbsp;J.A. Carbayo Herencia ,&nbsp;M. Simarro Rueda ,&nbsp;E. Carrasco Carrasco ,&nbsp;M. Guillén Pérez ,&nbsp;A. Muros Ortega","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The presence of the subject of Family and Community Medicine (FCM) is important in the medical degree and should be taught by family doctors. The aim of the study was to assess whether its inclusion as a discipline in the degree influences students and graduates in their choice of specialty.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Descriptive, observational and analytical study of surveys carried out on 422 students of the FCM subject who studied during the 2017-18 to 2023-24 academic years at the Faculty of Medicine of the Catholic University of Murcia and on 96 graduates of this university who, in the process of choosing a specialty, opted for FCM. In a first phase, the students of each course completed 2 surveys, one on the first day of class and another on the last, both in person. In each survey, 5 questions were asked on a 10-point Likert scale and one multiple-choice question. In the final survey, 4 questions were added, also on a 10-point Likert scale. In the second phase, a seven-question survey with dichotomous answers was sent electronically to the graduates in May 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>74% of the students were women, mean age 23.2 years SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.6. 290 (68.7%) answered the initial survey and 352 (83.4%) the final one. Most of them thought that FCM is important for the National Health System (NHS) and that it is not well valued by either the NHS or the patients. When asked if they considered the subject important in the degree, 75% of them gave it a score &gt;<!--> <!-->9. The percentage of students who considered FCM as a future option with an average score &gt;<!--> <!-->7 was 42% and after taking the subject this percentage increased to 57% (mean score at the beginning 5,9 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1,6 and at the end 7,7 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.6, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Regarding the academic and teaching staff evaluation, the average score was: interesting subject 7.9 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.8 (44%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->9), useful subject 8.57 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.6 (61%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->9) and different approach 7.6 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2 (78.2%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->7). The average evaluation of the teaching staff was &gt;<!--> <!-->9.</div><div>74.2% of the graduates were women, average age 28.4 years SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.8. 62 (64%) answered the survey; 66.1% did not know the specialty well before teaching the subject. For 51.6% of them, the subject changed their perception of the specialty, for 48.4% it made them consider the specialty as a future option and for 33.9% it influenced their choice of specialty. 91.9% chose the specialty by their own decision. Almost all of the graduates stated that the subject should be in the medical degree.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fact that the subject is taught by family doctors and the quality of teaching has positively influenced the choice of medical science as a specialty by students and graduates. Medical students considered the inclusion of the subject in the degree to be important and felt that medical science, as a specialty, is not well valued. The subject should be included in all medical schools and the teaching should be given by family doctors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53212,"journal":{"name":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencia de la asignatura Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria del grado de Medicina en la elección de la especialidad\",\"authors\":\"J.A. Divisón Garrote ,&nbsp;A. Castillo Sandoval ,&nbsp;J.A. Carbayo Herencia ,&nbsp;M. Simarro Rueda ,&nbsp;E. Carrasco Carrasco ,&nbsp;M. Guillén Pérez ,&nbsp;A. Muros Ortega\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The presence of the subject of Family and Community Medicine (FCM) is important in the medical degree and should be taught by family doctors. The aim of the study was to assess whether its inclusion as a discipline in the degree influences students and graduates in their choice of specialty.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Descriptive, observational and analytical study of surveys carried out on 422 students of the FCM subject who studied during the 2017-18 to 2023-24 academic years at the Faculty of Medicine of the Catholic University of Murcia and on 96 graduates of this university who, in the process of choosing a specialty, opted for FCM. In a first phase, the students of each course completed 2 surveys, one on the first day of class and another on the last, both in person. In each survey, 5 questions were asked on a 10-point Likert scale and one multiple-choice question. In the final survey, 4 questions were added, also on a 10-point Likert scale. In the second phase, a seven-question survey with dichotomous answers was sent electronically to the graduates in May 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>74% of the students were women, mean age 23.2 years SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.6. 290 (68.7%) answered the initial survey and 352 (83.4%) the final one. Most of them thought that FCM is important for the National Health System (NHS) and that it is not well valued by either the NHS or the patients. When asked if they considered the subject important in the degree, 75% of them gave it a score &gt;<!--> <!-->9. The percentage of students who considered FCM as a future option with an average score &gt;<!--> <!-->7 was 42% and after taking the subject this percentage increased to 57% (mean score at the beginning 5,9 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1,6 and at the end 7,7 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.6, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Regarding the academic and teaching staff evaluation, the average score was: interesting subject 7.9 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.8 (44%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->9), useful subject 8.57 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.6 (61%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->9) and different approach 7.6 SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2 (78.2%<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->7). The average evaluation of the teaching staff was &gt;<!--> <!-->9.</div><div>74.2% of the graduates were women, average age 28.4 years SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.8. 62 (64%) answered the survey; 66.1% did not know the specialty well before teaching the subject. For 51.6% of them, the subject changed their perception of the specialty, for 48.4% it made them consider the specialty as a future option and for 33.9% it influenced their choice of specialty. 91.9% chose the specialty by their own decision. Almost all of the graduates stated that the subject should be in the medical degree.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fact that the subject is taught by family doctors and the quality of teaching has positively influenced the choice of medical science as a specialty by students and graduates. Medical students considered the inclusion of the subject in the degree to be important and felt that medical science, as a specialty, is not well valued. The subject should be included in all medical schools and the teaching should be given by family doctors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的家庭与社区医学(FCM)学科在医学学位中占有重要地位,应由家庭医生讲授。该研究的目的是评估将其作为一门学科纳入学位是否会影响学生和毕业生对专业的选择。材料和方法对2017-18至2023-24学年在穆尔西亚天主教大学医学院学习的422名FCM学生和96名在选择专业过程中选择FCM的该大学毕业生进行的调查进行描述性,观察性和分析性研究。在第一阶段,每门课程的学生都要完成两份调查,一份在上课的第一天,另一份在上课的最后一天,都是面对面的。在每次调查中,有5个问题在10分的李克特量表和一个选择题。在最后的调查中,增加了4个问题,同样是10分的李克特量表。在第二阶段,一份由7个问题组成的调查问卷在2024年5月以电子方式发送给毕业生。结果女性占74%,平均年龄23.2岁,SD = 1.6。290名(68.7%)回答了第一次调查,352名(83.4%)回答了最后一次调查。他们中的大多数人认为FCM对国家卫生系统(NHS)很重要,NHS和患者都不重视它。当被问及他们是否认为这门学科在学位中很重要时,75%的人给了分数。9. 将FCM视为未来选择的平均成绩学生的百分比>;7为42%,在接受受试者后,这一百分比增加到57%(开始时的平均得分为5,9 SD = 1,6,结束时的平均得分为7,7 SD = 2.6, p <;0.001)。在学术和教学人员评价方面,平均得分为:有趣学科7.9 SD = 1.8 (44% >;9),有用受试者8.57 SD = 1.6 (61% >;9)和不同方法7.6 SD = 2 (78.2% >;7)教师的平均评价为>;9.74.2%为女性,平均年龄28.4岁,SD = 2.8。62人(64%)回答了调查;66.1%的学生在开课前对专业不了解。其中51.6%的人改变了他们对专业的看法,48.4%的人认为这是他们未来的选择,33.9%的人影响了他们对专业的选择。91.9%是自主选择专业。几乎所有的毕业生都认为这门学科应该在医学学位中。结论家庭医生授课和教学质量对学生和毕业生选择医学专业产生了积极的影响。医学生认为将这门学科纳入学位是很重要的,并且认为医学作为一门专业没有得到很好的重视。所有医学院都应开设这门课程,并由家庭医生授课。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influencia de la asignatura Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria del grado de Medicina en la elección de la especialidad

Objectives

The presence of the subject of Family and Community Medicine (FCM) is important in the medical degree and should be taught by family doctors. The aim of the study was to assess whether its inclusion as a discipline in the degree influences students and graduates in their choice of specialty.

Material and methods

Descriptive, observational and analytical study of surveys carried out on 422 students of the FCM subject who studied during the 2017-18 to 2023-24 academic years at the Faculty of Medicine of the Catholic University of Murcia and on 96 graduates of this university who, in the process of choosing a specialty, opted for FCM. In a first phase, the students of each course completed 2 surveys, one on the first day of class and another on the last, both in person. In each survey, 5 questions were asked on a 10-point Likert scale and one multiple-choice question. In the final survey, 4 questions were added, also on a 10-point Likert scale. In the second phase, a seven-question survey with dichotomous answers was sent electronically to the graduates in May 2024.

Results

74% of the students were women, mean age 23.2 years SD = 1.6. 290 (68.7%) answered the initial survey and 352 (83.4%) the final one. Most of them thought that FCM is important for the National Health System (NHS) and that it is not well valued by either the NHS or the patients. When asked if they considered the subject important in the degree, 75% of them gave it a score > 9. The percentage of students who considered FCM as a future option with an average score > 7 was 42% and after taking the subject this percentage increased to 57% (mean score at the beginning 5,9 SD = 1,6 and at the end 7,7 SD = 2.6, p < 0.001). Regarding the academic and teaching staff evaluation, the average score was: interesting subject 7.9 SD = 1.8 (44% > 9), useful subject 8.57 SD = 1.6 (61% > 9) and different approach 7.6 SD = 2 (78.2% > 7). The average evaluation of the teaching staff was > 9.
74.2% of the graduates were women, average age 28.4 years SD = 2.8. 62 (64%) answered the survey; 66.1% did not know the specialty well before teaching the subject. For 51.6% of them, the subject changed their perception of the specialty, for 48.4% it made them consider the specialty as a future option and for 33.9% it influenced their choice of specialty. 91.9% chose the specialty by their own decision. Almost all of the graduates stated that the subject should be in the medical degree.

Conclusions

The fact that the subject is taught by family doctors and the quality of teaching has positively influenced the choice of medical science as a specialty by students and graduates. Medical students considered the inclusion of the subject in the degree to be important and felt that medical science, as a specialty, is not well valued. The subject should be included in all medical schools and the teaching should be given by family doctors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
39 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信