体育教学中学生对人工智能生成内容的行为意向与使用行为研究：基于技术接受与使用统一理论模型的扩展

IF 4.8 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100547

Qianjin Wu , Shanshan Li , Shuang Xin , Qian Hou , Ping Li

{"title":"体育教学中学生对人工智能生成内容的行为意向与使用行为研究：基于技术接受与使用统一理论模型的扩展","authors":"Qianjin Wu , Shanshan Li , Shuang Xin , Qian Hou , Ping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines factors affecting AIGC acceptance among physical education students using the UTAUT model and perceived risk. Analyzing 414 Chinese students via PLS-SEM reveals that performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived risk significantly influence behavioural intention, whereas effort expectancy does not. Both facilitating conditions and behavioural intention positively influence use behaviour, with the impact of facilitating conditions being partially mediated by behavioural intention. Gender does not moderate these relationships. Findings suggest promoting AIGC in sports teaching by enhancing performance expectancy, leveraging social influence, optimizing facilitating conditions, and improving risk education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100547"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on students' behavioural intention and use behaviour of artificial intelligence-generated content in physical education: Employing an extended the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model\",\"authors\":\"Qianjin Wu , Shanshan Li , Shuang Xin , Qian Hou , Ping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines factors affecting AIGC acceptance among physical education students using the UTAUT model and perceived risk. Analyzing 414 Chinese students via PLS-SEM reveals that performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived risk significantly influence behavioural intention, whereas effort expectancy does not. Both facilitating conditions and behavioural intention positively influence use behaviour, with the impact of facilitating conditions being partially mediated by behavioural intention. Gender does not moderate these relationships. Findings suggest promoting AIGC in sports teaching by enhancing performance expectancy, leveraging social influence, optimizing facilitating conditions, and improving risk education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473837625000139\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473837625000139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究运用UTAUT模型和感知风险，探讨影响体育学生接受AIGC的因素。通过对414名中国学生的PLS-SEM分析发现，绩效期望、社会影响、便利条件和感知风险对行为意愿有显著影响，而努力期望对行为意愿没有显著影响。便利条件和行为意愿都对使用行为产生积极影响，便利条件的影响部分被行为意愿所调节。性别并不能调节这些关系。研究结果建议通过提高成绩期望、发挥社会影响、优化促进条件和加强风险教育等措施促进体育教学中的AIGC。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A study on students' behavioural intention and use behaviour of artificial intelligence-generated content in physical education: Employing an extended the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model

This study examines factors affecting AIGC acceptance among physical education students using the UTAUT model and perceived risk. Analyzing 414 Chinese students via PLS-SEM reveals that performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived risk significantly influence behavioural intention, whereas effort expectancy does not. Both facilitating conditions and behavioural intention positively influence use behaviour, with the impact of facilitating conditions being partially mediated by behavioural intention. Gender does not moderate these relationships. Findings suggest promoting AIGC in sports teaching by enhancing performance expectancy, leveraging social influence, optimizing facilitating conditions, and improving risk education.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education Multiple-

CiteScore

8.10

自引率

10.80%

发文量

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education (JoHLSTE) is the leading international, peer-reviewed educational journal for this subject grouping. Its aims are to: a) Promote, enhance and disseminate research, good practice and innovation in all aspects of higher education in Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism and Events to its prime audience including teachers, researchers, employers, and policy makers. b) Encourage greater understanding, links and collaboration across its constituent fields. JoHLSTE is designed to have maximum impact through it being available on-line, fully archived and peer-reviewed. JoHLSTE is divided into seven sections: Editorial; Academic Papers; Practice Papers, Perspectives, Comments and Rejoinders, Research Notes and Reports and Education Resource Reviews.