前庭神经鞘瘤患者的生活质量评估工具：一项系统综述

IF 1.8 4区医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101585

Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Barbara Kostecka, Andrzej Kokoszka

{"title":"前庭神经鞘瘤患者的生活质量评估工具：一项系统综述","authors":"Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Barbara Kostecka, Andrzej Kokoszka","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) indicated that different study designs and methodologies led to inconsistent conclusions about treatment methods and QoL in patients with Vestibular Schwannoma (VS). This study systematically reviews recent findings about QoL assessment instruments for patients with VS and provides recommendations for the measurement of QoL with standardized psychometric tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The key words used were as follows: quality of life, health-related quality of life, vestibular schwannomas, acoustic neuroma. Studies were included when the following eligibility criteria were met.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our search finally yielded 48 articles published in years 2014–2024 that measured QoL in patients with VS using standardized psychometric tools. The studies examined various dimensions of QoL. The most frequently used disease-specific questionnaire was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL). As a generic tool, authors preferred to use the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Recent findings and data on Quality of Life (QoL) tools for patients with VS emphasize the importance of using standardized and disease specific tool like PANQOL, due to their frequent use and large amount of patient data. Although the SF-36 is commonly used for general assessments, it may not be sensitive enough for a complete QoL evaluation and should not be the only tool used. The GBI is effective for assessing changes after specific medical treatments. Using methods similar to those in past studies helps medical professionals make reliable conclusions about QoL and evaluate the effects of different treatments in VS patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"91 3","pages":"Article 101585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality-of-life assessment instruments for patients with vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Barbara Kostecka, Andrzej Kokoszka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) indicated that different study designs and methodologies led to inconsistent conclusions about treatment methods and QoL in patients with Vestibular Schwannoma (VS). This study systematically reviews recent findings about QoL assessment instruments for patients with VS and provides recommendations for the measurement of QoL with standardized psychometric tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The key words used were as follows: quality of life, health-related quality of life, vestibular schwannomas, acoustic neuroma. Studies were included when the following eligibility criteria were met.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our search finally yielded 48 articles published in years 2014–2024 that measured QoL in patients with VS using standardized psychometric tools. The studies examined various dimensions of QoL. The most frequently used disease-specific questionnaire was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL). As a generic tool, authors preferred to use the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Recent findings and data on Quality of Life (QoL) tools for patients with VS emphasize the importance of using standardized and disease specific tool like PANQOL, due to their frequent use and large amount of patient data. Although the SF-36 is commonly used for general assessments, it may not be sensitive enough for a complete QoL evaluation and should not be the only tool used. The GBI is effective for assessing changes after specific medical treatments. Using methods similar to those in past studies helps medical professionals make reliable conclusions about QoL and evaluate the effects of different treatments in VS patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S180886942500028X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S180886942500028X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的欧洲神经肿瘤学协会（EANO）指出，不同的研究设计和方法导致前庭神经鞘瘤（VS）患者的治疗方法和生活质量结论不一致。本研究系统回顾了近年来关于VS患者生活质量评估工具的研究成果，并提出了使用标准化心理测量工具测量VS患者生活质量的建议。方法本研究依据PRISMA 2020系统评价报告指南进行。关键词：生活质量、健康相关生活质量、前庭神经鞘瘤、听神经瘤。当符合下列资格标准时纳入研究。我们的搜索最终获得了2014-2024年间发表的48篇文章，这些文章使用标准化的心理测量工具测量了VS患者的生活质量。这些研究考察了生活质量的各个维度。最常用的疾病特异性问卷是宾州听神经瘤生活质量（PANQOL）。作为一种通用工具，作者倾向于使用简表36项健康调查（SF-36）。结论最近关于VS患者生活质量（QoL）工具的研究结果和数据强调了使用标准化和疾病特异性工具（如PANQOL）的重要性，因为它们使用频繁且患者数据量大。虽然SF-36通常用于一般评估，但对于完整的生活质量评估而言，它可能不够敏感，不应作为唯一使用的工具。GBI对于评估特定药物治疗后的变化是有效的。使用类似于过去研究的方法，可以帮助医疗专业人员得出可靠的生活质量结论，并评估VS患者不同治疗方法的效果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Quality-of-life assessment instruments for patients with vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review

Objective

The European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) indicated that different study designs and methodologies led to inconsistent conclusions about treatment methods and QoL in patients with Vestibular Schwannoma (VS). This study systematically reviews recent findings about QoL assessment instruments for patients with VS and provides recommendations for the measurement of QoL with standardized psychometric tools.

Methods

This study was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The key words used were as follows: quality of life, health-related quality of life, vestibular schwannomas, acoustic neuroma. Studies were included when the following eligibility criteria were met.

Results

Our search finally yielded 48 articles published in years 2014–2024 that measured QoL in patients with VS using standardized psychometric tools. The studies examined various dimensions of QoL. The most frequently used disease-specific questionnaire was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL). As a generic tool, authors preferred to use the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36).

Conclusion

Recent findings and data on Quality of Life (QoL) tools for patients with VS emphasize the importance of using standardized and disease specific tool like PANQOL, due to their frequent use and large amount of patient data. Although the SF-36 is commonly used for general assessments, it may not be sensitive enough for a complete QoL evaluation and should not be the only tool used. The GBI is effective for assessing changes after specific medical treatments. Using methods similar to those in past studies helps medical professionals make reliable conclusions about QoL and evaluate the effects of different treatments in VS patients.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

205

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance. The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.