在线技术和资源能取代会计教师吗?学生对会计教师重要性的认知

Q1 Social Sciences
Ferdinand Siagian , Daniel Bryan
{"title":"在线技术和资源能取代会计教师吗?学生对会计教师重要性的认知","authors":"Ferdinand Siagian ,&nbsp;Daniel Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in online technology and resources allow accounting programs to reduce faculty’s online teaching load. We investigate how students, the accounting education stakeholders most affected by the use of online technology, perceive this development. We surveyed students enrolled in online accounting courses at two AACSB-accredited universities in the US and find strong evidence that despite the advancement of online technology and resources, most students do not think that technology and online resources can replace faculty. Moreover, they do not believe that they can perform as well without faculty and thus prefer to take an online course with faculty. Their perceptions and preferences toward having an online course with faculty are positively influenced by the perceived quality of their current faculty and their GPA. Furthermore, they are negatively influenced by the perceived quality of the online technology and resources they use and their self-perceived computer ability. Additionally, we find that 25% of students who originally prefer an online course with faculty change their minds to a course without faculty when presented with a financial incentive. When presented with a flexibility incentive, 33% of students change their minds and prefer a course without faculty. Our results are consistent with the notion that most students recognize the importance of high-quality accounting faculty teaching their online courses and want them to teach their online courses. Our study is important for accounting programs interested in utilizing technology to reduce faculty teaching loads or searching for the optimal mix of faculty and technology in their accounting courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can online technology and resources replace accounting faculty? Student perceptions of the importance of accounting faculty\",\"authors\":\"Ferdinand Siagian ,&nbsp;Daniel Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advances in online technology and resources allow accounting programs to reduce faculty’s online teaching load. We investigate how students, the accounting education stakeholders most affected by the use of online technology, perceive this development. We surveyed students enrolled in online accounting courses at two AACSB-accredited universities in the US and find strong evidence that despite the advancement of online technology and resources, most students do not think that technology and online resources can replace faculty. Moreover, they do not believe that they can perform as well without faculty and thus prefer to take an online course with faculty. Their perceptions and preferences toward having an online course with faculty are positively influenced by the perceived quality of their current faculty and their GPA. Furthermore, they are negatively influenced by the perceived quality of the online technology and resources they use and their self-perceived computer ability. Additionally, we find that 25% of students who originally prefer an online course with faculty change their minds to a course without faculty when presented with a financial incentive. When presented with a flexibility incentive, 33% of students change their minds and prefer a course without faculty. Our results are consistent with the notion that most students recognize the importance of high-quality accounting faculty teaching their online courses and want them to teach their online courses. Our study is important for accounting programs interested in utilizing technology to reduce faculty teaching loads or searching for the optimal mix of faculty and technology in their accounting courses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线技术和资源的进步使会计课程减少了教师的在线教学负担。我们调查了受在线技术使用影响最大的会计教育利益相关者学生如何看待这一发展。我们调查了美国两所aacsb认证的大学的在线会计课程的学生,发现强有力的证据表明,尽管在线技术和资源取得了进步,但大多数学生并不认为技术和在线资源可以取代教师。此外,他们不相信自己在没有老师的情况下也能表现得很好,因此他们更愿意参加有老师的在线课程。他们对与教师一起参加在线课程的看法和偏好受到他们当前教师的感知质量和他们的GPA的积极影响。此外,他们使用的在线技术和资源的感知质量和他们自我感知的计算机能力对他们有负向影响。此外,我们发现,原本喜欢有教师的在线课程的学生中,有25%的人在有经济激励的情况下改变了主意,转而选择没有教师的课程。当提供灵活性激励时,33%的学生改变了主意,更喜欢没有教师的课程。我们的结果与大多数学生认识到高质量的会计教师教授他们在线课程的重要性并希望他们教授他们的在线课程的观点是一致的。我们的研究对于有兴趣利用技术来减少教师教学负担或在会计课程中寻找教师和技术的最佳组合的会计专业非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can online technology and resources replace accounting faculty? Student perceptions of the importance of accounting faculty
Advances in online technology and resources allow accounting programs to reduce faculty’s online teaching load. We investigate how students, the accounting education stakeholders most affected by the use of online technology, perceive this development. We surveyed students enrolled in online accounting courses at two AACSB-accredited universities in the US and find strong evidence that despite the advancement of online technology and resources, most students do not think that technology and online resources can replace faculty. Moreover, they do not believe that they can perform as well without faculty and thus prefer to take an online course with faculty. Their perceptions and preferences toward having an online course with faculty are positively influenced by the perceived quality of their current faculty and their GPA. Furthermore, they are negatively influenced by the perceived quality of the online technology and resources they use and their self-perceived computer ability. Additionally, we find that 25% of students who originally prefer an online course with faculty change their minds to a course without faculty when presented with a financial incentive. When presented with a flexibility incentive, 33% of students change their minds and prefer a course without faculty. Our results are consistent with the notion that most students recognize the importance of high-quality accounting faculty teaching their online courses and want them to teach their online courses. Our study is important for accounting programs interested in utilizing technology to reduce faculty teaching loads or searching for the optimal mix of faculty and technology in their accounting courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信