对安全堕胎的抗拒、合理化和妇女权利:来自罗伊诉韦德案推翻的证据

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ghina Abdul Baki , Louis-Philippe Beland , Myra Yazbeck , Aline Zayat
{"title":"对安全堕胎的抗拒、合理化和妇女权利:来自罗伊诉韦德案推翻的证据","authors":"Ghina Abdul Baki ,&nbsp;Louis-Philippe Beland ,&nbsp;Myra Yazbeck ,&nbsp;Aline Zayat","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the societal response to the overturning of Roe vs. Wade and its potential impact on abortion rights. We use data from Google Trends and Twitter engagement to comprehensively analyze public responses. Analysis of Google search trends and Twitter activity reveals a significant surge in public interest and concerns immediately following the news of the overturn. The findings demonstrate a clear polarization of sentiments, with expressions of both pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Additionally, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that reactions vary among states, with states hostile to abortion rights exhibiting heightened negative sentiment. Overall, our findings highlight an intense but short-lived public reaction to the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights, which may have broader social implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 106956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn\",\"authors\":\"Ghina Abdul Baki ,&nbsp;Louis-Philippe Beland ,&nbsp;Myra Yazbeck ,&nbsp;Aline Zayat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the societal response to the overturning of Roe vs. Wade and its potential impact on abortion rights. We use data from Google Trends and Twitter engagement to comprehensively analyze public responses. Analysis of Google search trends and Twitter activity reveals a significant surge in public interest and concerns immediately following the news of the overturn. The findings demonstrate a clear polarization of sentiments, with expressions of both pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Additionally, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that reactions vary among states, with states hostile to abortion rights exhibiting heightened negative sentiment. Overall, our findings highlight an intense but short-lived public reaction to the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights, which may have broader social implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000769\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了社会对推翻罗伊诉韦德案的反应及其对堕胎权的潜在影响。我们使用谷歌趋势和Twitter参与的数据来全面分析公众反应。对b谷歌搜索趋势和Twitter活动的分析显示,在判决被推翻的消息公布后,公众的兴趣和担忧立即大幅上升。调查结果显示了一种明显的两极分化情绪,既有支持堕胎的观点,也有反对堕胎的观点。此外,异质性分析表明,各州的反应各不相同,对堕胎权持敌对态度的州表现出强烈的负面情绪。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了公众对围绕堕胎权的持续辩论的强烈但短暂的反应,这可能具有更广泛的社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn
This study explores the societal response to the overturning of Roe vs. Wade and its potential impact on abortion rights. We use data from Google Trends and Twitter engagement to comprehensively analyze public responses. Analysis of Google search trends and Twitter activity reveals a significant surge in public interest and concerns immediately following the news of the overturn. The findings demonstrate a clear polarization of sentiments, with expressions of both pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Additionally, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that reactions vary among states, with states hostile to abortion rights exhibiting heightened negative sentiment. Overall, our findings highlight an intense but short-lived public reaction to the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights, which may have broader social implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信