替代燃料可持续性评估决策框架,以实现航运脱碳

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Kazi Khaled Mahmud , Wahidul Sheikh , Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury
{"title":"替代燃料可持续性评估决策框架,以实现航运脱碳","authors":"Kazi Khaled Mahmud ,&nbsp;Wahidul Sheikh ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition of shipping industry towards full decarbonization is under way, driven by regulations, the IMO's decarbonization targets, pressure from cargo owners, financial incentives, and evolving societal expectations. However, the need for a comprehensive framework to evaluate fuel options impedes the maritime industry's transition to alternative fuels. Stakeholders are still searching the most suitable alternative fuels which will ensure both the regulatory compliance and economic benefits. Hence, the study aimed to determine the most promising alternative fuel for the shipping industry based on a robust set of alternative fuel selection criteria and establish a comprehensive decision-making framework within a global context using a mixed-methods approach. The study identified an integrated set of sustainability criteria for alternative fuels utilizing systematic literature review framework and adopted the Best Worst Method (BWM) for determining the relative weight of criteria. Finally, the TOPSIS method has been used to outrank the alternative fuels-methanol, hydrogen, biofuel, ammonia, and LNG. The study concludes that methanol exhibits the highest potential as a sustainable future clean fuel, followed by hydrogen, biofuels, ammonia, and LNG respectively. The findings of the study are generalized as a decision support system to assist the stakeholder while making robust and comprehensive decisions about the choice of sustainable fuels through a balanced and all-encompassing view.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision framework for sustainability assessment of alternative fuels to achieve shipping decarbonization\",\"authors\":\"Kazi Khaled Mahmud ,&nbsp;Wahidul Sheikh ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The transition of shipping industry towards full decarbonization is under way, driven by regulations, the IMO's decarbonization targets, pressure from cargo owners, financial incentives, and evolving societal expectations. However, the need for a comprehensive framework to evaluate fuel options impedes the maritime industry's transition to alternative fuels. Stakeholders are still searching the most suitable alternative fuels which will ensure both the regulatory compliance and economic benefits. Hence, the study aimed to determine the most promising alternative fuel for the shipping industry based on a robust set of alternative fuel selection criteria and establish a comprehensive decision-making framework within a global context using a mixed-methods approach. The study identified an integrated set of sustainability criteria for alternative fuels utilizing systematic literature review framework and adopted the Best Worst Method (BWM) for determining the relative weight of criteria. Finally, the TOPSIS method has been used to outrank the alternative fuels-methanol, hydrogen, biofuel, ammonia, and LNG. The study concludes that methanol exhibits the highest potential as a sustainable future clean fuel, followed by hydrogen, biofuels, ammonia, and LNG respectively. The findings of the study are generalized as a decision support system to assist the stakeholder while making robust and comprehensive decisions about the choice of sustainable fuels through a balanced and all-encompassing view.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"265 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法规、国际海事组织脱碳目标、货主压力、财政激励和不断变化的社会期望的推动下,航运业正在向全面脱碳过渡。然而,需要一个全面的框架来评估燃料选择,这阻碍了海运业向替代燃料的过渡。利益相关者仍在寻找最合适的替代燃料,以确保符合法规和经济效益。因此,本研究旨在根据一套强有力的替代燃料选择标准,为航运业确定最有前途的替代燃料,并使用混合方法在全球范围内建立一个全面的决策框架。本研究利用系统的文献综述框架,确定了一套综合的替代燃料可持续性标准,并采用最佳最差法(Best - Worst Method, BWM)确定标准的相对权重。最后,TOPSIS方法已被用于超越替代燃料-甲醇,氢,生物燃料,氨和液化天然气。该研究得出结论,甲醇作为未来可持续清洁燃料的潜力最大,其次是氢、生物燃料、氨和液化天然气。该研究的结果被概括为一个决策支持系统,以帮助利益相关者在通过平衡和无所不包的观点做出关于可持续燃料选择的稳健和全面的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision framework for sustainability assessment of alternative fuels to achieve shipping decarbonization
The transition of shipping industry towards full decarbonization is under way, driven by regulations, the IMO's decarbonization targets, pressure from cargo owners, financial incentives, and evolving societal expectations. However, the need for a comprehensive framework to evaluate fuel options impedes the maritime industry's transition to alternative fuels. Stakeholders are still searching the most suitable alternative fuels which will ensure both the regulatory compliance and economic benefits. Hence, the study aimed to determine the most promising alternative fuel for the shipping industry based on a robust set of alternative fuel selection criteria and establish a comprehensive decision-making framework within a global context using a mixed-methods approach. The study identified an integrated set of sustainability criteria for alternative fuels utilizing systematic literature review framework and adopted the Best Worst Method (BWM) for determining the relative weight of criteria. Finally, the TOPSIS method has been used to outrank the alternative fuels-methanol, hydrogen, biofuel, ammonia, and LNG. The study concludes that methanol exhibits the highest potential as a sustainable future clean fuel, followed by hydrogen, biofuels, ammonia, and LNG respectively. The findings of the study are generalized as a decision support system to assist the stakeholder while making robust and comprehensive decisions about the choice of sustainable fuels through a balanced and all-encompassing view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信