Justin P. Skinner*, Alia Raderstorf, Bruce E. Rittmann and Anca G. Delgado*,
{"title":"生物转化“永远的化学物质”:PFAS微生物学研究的趋势和见解","authors":"Justin P. Skinner*, Alia Raderstorf, Bruce E. Rittmann and Anca G. Delgado*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c0455710.1021/acs.est.4c04557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant contaminants of emerging concern. Research efforts have been dedicated to PFAS microbial biotransformation in the hopes of developing treatment technologies using microorganisms as catalysts. Here, we performed a meta-analysis by extracting and standardizing quantitative data from 97 microbial PFAS biotransformation studies and comparing outcomes <i>via</i> statistical tests. This meta-analysis indicated that the likelihood of PFAS biotransformation was higher under aerobic conditions, in experiments with defined or axenic cultures, when high concentrations of PFAS were used, and when PFAS contained fewer fluorine atoms in the molecule. This meta-analysis also documented that PFAS biotransformation depends on chain length, chain branching geometries, and headgroup chemistry. We found that the literature is scarce or lacking in (i) anaerobic PFAS biotransformation experiments with well-defined electron acceptors, electron donors, carbon sources, and oxidation–reduction potentials, (ii) analyses of PFAS biotransformation products, and (iii) analyses to identify microorganisms and enzymes responsible for PFAS biotransformation. To date, most biotransformation research emphasis has been on 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH), 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). A wide array of PFAS remains to be tested for their potential to biotransform.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 11","pages":"5417–5430 5417–5430"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.4c04557","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biotransforming the “Forever Chemicals”: Trends and Insights from Microbiological Studies on PFAS\",\"authors\":\"Justin P. Skinner*, Alia Raderstorf, Bruce E. Rittmann and Anca G. Delgado*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c0455710.1021/acs.est.4c04557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant contaminants of emerging concern. Research efforts have been dedicated to PFAS microbial biotransformation in the hopes of developing treatment technologies using microorganisms as catalysts. Here, we performed a meta-analysis by extracting and standardizing quantitative data from 97 microbial PFAS biotransformation studies and comparing outcomes <i>via</i> statistical tests. This meta-analysis indicated that the likelihood of PFAS biotransformation was higher under aerobic conditions, in experiments with defined or axenic cultures, when high concentrations of PFAS were used, and when PFAS contained fewer fluorine atoms in the molecule. This meta-analysis also documented that PFAS biotransformation depends on chain length, chain branching geometries, and headgroup chemistry. We found that the literature is scarce or lacking in (i) anaerobic PFAS biotransformation experiments with well-defined electron acceptors, electron donors, carbon sources, and oxidation–reduction potentials, (ii) analyses of PFAS biotransformation products, and (iii) analyses to identify microorganisms and enzymes responsible for PFAS biotransformation. To date, most biotransformation research emphasis has been on 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH), 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). A wide array of PFAS remains to be tested for their potential to biotransform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 11\",\"pages\":\"5417–5430 5417–5430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.4c04557\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c04557\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c04557","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biotransforming the “Forever Chemicals”: Trends and Insights from Microbiological Studies on PFAS
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant contaminants of emerging concern. Research efforts have been dedicated to PFAS microbial biotransformation in the hopes of developing treatment technologies using microorganisms as catalysts. Here, we performed a meta-analysis by extracting and standardizing quantitative data from 97 microbial PFAS biotransformation studies and comparing outcomes via statistical tests. This meta-analysis indicated that the likelihood of PFAS biotransformation was higher under aerobic conditions, in experiments with defined or axenic cultures, when high concentrations of PFAS were used, and when PFAS contained fewer fluorine atoms in the molecule. This meta-analysis also documented that PFAS biotransformation depends on chain length, chain branching geometries, and headgroup chemistry. We found that the literature is scarce or lacking in (i) anaerobic PFAS biotransformation experiments with well-defined electron acceptors, electron donors, carbon sources, and oxidation–reduction potentials, (ii) analyses of PFAS biotransformation products, and (iii) analyses to identify microorganisms and enzymes responsible for PFAS biotransformation. To date, most biotransformation research emphasis has been on 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH), 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). A wide array of PFAS remains to be tested for their potential to biotransform.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.