{"title":"溶液中计算分子振荡器强度的椭球腔场校正的实现:一个(另一个)基准研究","authors":"Jorge C. Garcia-Alvarez*, and , Samer Gozem*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c0007010.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (<i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (<i>f</i><sub>exp</sub>) multiplied by the refractive index (<i>n</i>) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> instead of <i>f</i><sub>exp</sub> as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub> values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs, while for hybrid functionals <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> overestimates <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"21 6","pages":"3120–3131 3120–3131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an Ellipsoidal-Cavity Field Correction for Computed Molecular Oscillator Strengths in Solution: A(nother) Benchmark Study\",\"authors\":\"Jorge C. Garcia-Alvarez*, and , Samer Gozem*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c0007010.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (<i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (<i>f</i><sub>exp</sub>) multiplied by the refractive index (<i>n</i>) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> instead of <i>f</i><sub>exp</sub> as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub> values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs, while for hybrid functionals <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> overestimates <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"3120–3131 3120–3131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of an Ellipsoidal-Cavity Field Correction for Computed Molecular Oscillator Strengths in Solution: A(nother) Benchmark Study
We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (fcomp) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (fexp) multiplied by the refractive index (n) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of nfexp instead of fexp as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to fcomp values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as fcompS. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that fcompS generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than fcomp. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (nfexp, fcompS) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (nfexp, fcompS) pairs, while for hybrid functionals fcompS overestimates nfexp to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.