溶液中计算分子振荡器强度的椭球腔场校正的实现:一个(另一个)基准研究

IF 5.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Jorge C. Garcia-Alvarez*,  and , Samer Gozem*, 
{"title":"溶液中计算分子振荡器强度的椭球腔场校正的实现:一个(另一个)基准研究","authors":"Jorge C. Garcia-Alvarez*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Samer Gozem*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c0007010.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (<i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (<i>f</i><sub>exp</sub>) multiplied by the refractive index (<i>n</i>) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> instead of <i>f</i><sub>exp</sub> as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub> values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs, while for hybrid functionals <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> overestimates <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"21 6","pages":"3120–3131 3120–3131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an Ellipsoidal-Cavity Field Correction for Computed Molecular Oscillator Strengths in Solution: A(nother) Benchmark Study\",\"authors\":\"Jorge C. Garcia-Alvarez*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Samer Gozem*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c0007010.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (<i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (<i>f</i><sub>exp</sub>) multiplied by the refractive index (<i>n</i>) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> instead of <i>f</i><sub>exp</sub> as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub> values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub>. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (<i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub>, <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup>) pairs, while for hybrid functionals <i>f</i><sub>comp</sub><sup>S</sup> overestimates <i>nf</i><sub>exp</sub> to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"3120–3131 3120–3131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们最近比较了从电子结构计算(fcomp)得到的振荡器强度(OS)和从实验光谱(fexp)乘以测量光谱的溶液的折射率(n)得到的OS。选择fexp而不是fexp作为参考说明了介电介质(实验溶剂)中的宏观能量通量。在这里,我们对驱动吸收跃迁的局部电磁场(通常不同于宏观场)的fcomp值进行近似校正。我们把这些修改过的操作系统称为fcompS。修正是通过假设每个分子占据一个椭球腔,适合其范德华表面,被代表溶剂的连续介质模型包围而得到的。从33到85个实验转换的集合用于基准。对于LR-CCSD和EOM-CCSD,我们发现fcompS与实验强度的一致性优于fcompS。例如,对于长度计中的LR-CCSD, (nfexp, fcompS)对有1对1的缩放。相反,TD-DFT的结果取决于泛函中使用的HF交换量:纯泛函通常也具有1比1的缩放(nfexp, fcompS)对,而对于混合泛函,fcompS将nfexp高估到与泛函中存在的HF交换量成比例的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of an Ellipsoidal-Cavity Field Correction for Computed Molecular Oscillator Strengths in Solution: A(nother) Benchmark Study

We recently compared oscillator strengths (OS) obtained from electronic structure calculations (fcomp) to OSs derived from experimental spectra (fexp) multiplied by the refractive index (n) of the solution in which the spectra were measured. The choice of nfexp instead of fexp as a reference accounts for the macroscopic flux of energy in a dielectric (the experimental solvent). Here, we apply an approximate correction to fcomp values that accounts for the local electromagnetic field driving the absorption transition (which is generally different from the macroscopic field). We refer to these modified OSs as fcompS. The correction is obtained by assuming that each molecule occupies an ellipsoidal cavity, fitted to its van der Waals surface, surrounded by a continuum dielectric model representing the solvent. Sets ranging from 33 to 85 experimental transitions are used for the benchmark. For LR-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, we find that fcompS generally gives a better agreement with experimental strengths than fcomp. For LR-CCSD in the length gauge, for instance, there is a 1 to 1 scaling of the (nfexp, fcompS) pairs. Instead, the results for TD-DFT depend on the amount of HF exchange used in the functional: pure functionals typically also have a 1 to 1 scaling of the (nfexp, fcompS) pairs, while for hybrid functionals fcompS overestimates nfexp to a degree that appears proportional to the amount of HF exchange present in the functional.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信