2008年日本岩手-宫城县6.9级地震震源区附近常规地震与板内低频地震能量辐射过程的系统差异

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Masaki Orimo, Keisuke Yoshida, Toru Matsuzawa, Taka'aki Taira, Kentaro Emoto, Akira Hasegawa
{"title":"2008年日本岩手-宫城县6.9级地震震源区附近常规地震与板内低频地震能量辐射过程的系统差异","authors":"Masaki Orimo,&nbsp;Keisuke Yoshida,&nbsp;Toru Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Taka'aki Taira,&nbsp;Kentaro Emoto,&nbsp;Akira Hasegawa","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many unknowns exist regarding the energy radiation processes of intraplate low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs), which are frequently observed beneath volcanoes. To evaluate their energy radiation characteristics, we estimated scaled energy (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) for LFEs and regular earthquakes around the focal area of the 2008 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${M}_{w}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, earthquake. Their source spectra were first obtained by correcting for the site and path effects from direct S-waves. We then estimated the radiated energy and seismic moment and obtained the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for the 1,421 regular earthquakes, 62 deep LFEs, and 46 shallow LFEs. The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for the regular earthquakes is in the order of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>5</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${10}^{-5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>4</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${10}^{-4}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, typical for crustal earthquakes and tends to be smaller near volcanoes and the shallow LFEs. In contrast, the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is in the order of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>7</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${10}^{-7}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>6</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${10}^{-6}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for the deep and shallow LFEs, respectively, one to three orders of magnitude smaller than that for the regular earthquakes. The systematically lower <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> suggests that LFEs are associated with a much lower stress drop and (or) slower deformation than regular earthquakes. While the energy magnitudes derived from radiated energy generally show good agreement with the local magnitudes for the three types of earthquakes, the moment and local magnitudes show a large discrepancy for the LFEs. This suggests that the local magnitude based only on the maximum amplitude of the observed seismic records may not provide good information on the static sizes of LFEs whose <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}_{R\\,}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is substantially different from that for regular earthquakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB030750","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Differences in Energy Radiation Processes Between Regular and Intraplate Low-Frequency Earthquakes Around the Focal Area of the 2008 \\n \\n \\n \\n M\\n w\\n \\n \\n ${\\\\boldsymbol{M}}_{\\\\boldsymbol{w}}$\\n 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, Earthquake\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Orimo,&nbsp;Keisuke Yoshida,&nbsp;Toru Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Taka'aki Taira,&nbsp;Kentaro Emoto,&nbsp;Akira Hasegawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB030750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many unknowns exist regarding the energy radiation processes of intraplate low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs), which are frequently observed beneath volcanoes. To evaluate their energy radiation characteristics, we estimated scaled energy (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) for LFEs and regular earthquakes around the focal area of the 2008 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mi>w</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${M}_{w}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, earthquake. Their source spectra were first obtained by correcting for the site and path effects from direct S-waves. We then estimated the radiated energy and seismic moment and obtained the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for the 1,421 regular earthquakes, 62 deep LFEs, and 46 shallow LFEs. The <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for the regular earthquakes is in the order of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>5</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${10}^{-5}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${10}^{-4}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, typical for crustal earthquakes and tends to be smaller near volcanoes and the shallow LFEs. In contrast, the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is in the order of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>7</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${10}^{-7}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>6</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${10}^{-6}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for the deep and shallow LFEs, respectively, one to three orders of magnitude smaller than that for the regular earthquakes. The systematically lower <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> suggests that LFEs are associated with a much lower stress drop and (or) slower deformation than regular earthquakes. While the energy magnitudes derived from radiated energy generally show good agreement with the local magnitudes for the three types of earthquakes, the moment and local magnitudes show a large discrepancy for the LFEs. This suggests that the local magnitude based only on the maximum amplitude of the observed seismic records may not provide good information on the static sizes of LFEs whose <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${e}_{R\\\\,}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is substantially different from that for regular earthquakes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB030750\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030750\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火山下经常观测到的板内低频地震(lfe)的能量辐射过程存在许多未知因素。为了评估它们的能量辐射特征,我们估计了2008年日本岩手-宫城地震(Mw${M}_{w}$ 6.9)震源区域附近的lfe和常规地震的标度能量(eR${e}_{R}$)。它们的源光谱首先通过校正直接s波的位置和路径效应得到。对1421次常规地震、62次深低频地震和46次浅低频地震的辐射能量和地震矩进行了估算,得到了eR${e}_{R}$。常规地震的eR${e}_{R}$在10−5${10}^{-5}$到10−4${10}^{-4}$之间,是典型的地壳地震,在火山和浅层生命活跃层附近往往较小。相比之下,深层和浅层低频地震的eR${e}_{R}$分别为10−7${10}^{-7}$和10−6${10}^{-6}$,比普通地震小1 ~ 3个数量级。较低的eR${e}_{R}$表明,与常规地震相比,lfe与更低的应力降和(或)更慢的变形有关。三种地震的辐射能震级与局地震级基本一致,而矩震级与局地震级存在较大差异。这表明,仅以观测到的地震记录的最大振幅为基础的局部震级可能不能很好地提供关于eR${e}_{R\,}$与常规地震的静态大小有很大不同的lfe的静态大小的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Systematic Differences in Energy Radiation Processes Between Regular and Intraplate Low-Frequency Earthquakes Around the Focal Area of the 2008 
         
            
               
                  M
                  w
               
            
             ${\boldsymbol{M}}_{\boldsymbol{w}}$
          6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, Earthquake

Systematic Differences in Energy Radiation Processes Between Regular and Intraplate Low-Frequency Earthquakes Around the Focal Area of the 2008 M w ${\boldsymbol{M}}_{\boldsymbol{w}}$ 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, Earthquake

Many unknowns exist regarding the energy radiation processes of intraplate low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs), which are frequently observed beneath volcanoes. To evaluate their energy radiation characteristics, we estimated scaled energy ( e R ${e}_{R}$ ) for LFEs and regular earthquakes around the focal area of the 2008 M w ${M}_{w}$ 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi, Japan, earthquake. Their source spectra were first obtained by correcting for the site and path effects from direct S-waves. We then estimated the radiated energy and seismic moment and obtained the e R ${e}_{R}$ for the 1,421 regular earthquakes, 62 deep LFEs, and 46 shallow LFEs. The e R ${e}_{R}$ for the regular earthquakes is in the order of 10 5 ${10}^{-5}$ to 10 4 ${10}^{-4}$ , typical for crustal earthquakes and tends to be smaller near volcanoes and the shallow LFEs. In contrast, the e R ${e}_{R}$ is in the order of 10 7 ${10}^{-7}$ and 10 6 ${10}^{-6}$ for the deep and shallow LFEs, respectively, one to three orders of magnitude smaller than that for the regular earthquakes. The systematically lower e R ${e}_{R}$ suggests that LFEs are associated with a much lower stress drop and (or) slower deformation than regular earthquakes. While the energy magnitudes derived from radiated energy generally show good agreement with the local magnitudes for the three types of earthquakes, the moment and local magnitudes show a large discrepancy for the LFEs. This suggests that the local magnitude based only on the maximum amplitude of the observed seismic records may not provide good information on the static sizes of LFEs whose e R ${e}_{R\,}$ is substantially different from that for regular earthquakes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信