走到一起!或不呢?购房者与其他住户共享设施的兴趣

IF 4.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jon Martin Denstadli, Ole Jakob Sønstebø
{"title":"走到一起!或不呢?购房者与其他住户共享设施的兴趣","authors":"Jon Martin Denstadli, Ole Jakob Sønstebø","doi":"10.1177/00420980251321351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Housing stands as a significant contributor to the adverse environmental impacts stemming from human activities. Reducing floor space emerges as a key strategy for advancing sustainable urban development since larger homes typically consume more electricity and heating. However, there is an undeniable link between dwelling size and residential satisfaction, making it challenging to design homes that are both functional and appealing within limited spatial constraints. A solution to mitigate spatial limitations involves the implementation of shared facilities within residential complexes. While individual households maintain exclusive access to their units, they also benefit from amenities usually found in larger dwellings. Despite its potential, the concept of shared facilities has received limited attention in the urban housing literature. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) in this unexplored context, involving an investment that carries considerable financial risk. Results demonstrate that our extended TPB model provides insights into homebuyers’ intentions to purchase dwellings with shared facilities. Out of the variables examined, attitudes emerge as the strongest predictor of intentions, indicating the need for collaborative efforts between developers and policymakers to bolster homebuyers’ interest in these unique housing solutions. The data reveals a tendency among homebuyers to compromise on dwelling size in favour of accessing amenities deemed essential for enhancing liveability. However, on the whole, homebuyers do not exhibit strong purchasing intentions, and attitudes towards the concept tend to be neutral.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Come together! Or not? Homebuyers’ interest in sharing facilities with fellow residents\",\"authors\":\"Jon Martin Denstadli, Ole Jakob Sønstebø\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00420980251321351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Housing stands as a significant contributor to the adverse environmental impacts stemming from human activities. Reducing floor space emerges as a key strategy for advancing sustainable urban development since larger homes typically consume more electricity and heating. However, there is an undeniable link between dwelling size and residential satisfaction, making it challenging to design homes that are both functional and appealing within limited spatial constraints. A solution to mitigate spatial limitations involves the implementation of shared facilities within residential complexes. While individual households maintain exclusive access to their units, they also benefit from amenities usually found in larger dwellings. Despite its potential, the concept of shared facilities has received limited attention in the urban housing literature. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) in this unexplored context, involving an investment that carries considerable financial risk. Results demonstrate that our extended TPB model provides insights into homebuyers’ intentions to purchase dwellings with shared facilities. Out of the variables examined, attitudes emerge as the strongest predictor of intentions, indicating the need for collaborative efforts between developers and policymakers to bolster homebuyers’ interest in these unique housing solutions. The data reveals a tendency among homebuyers to compromise on dwelling size in favour of accessing amenities deemed essential for enhancing liveability. However, on the whole, homebuyers do not exhibit strong purchasing intentions, and attitudes towards the concept tend to be neutral.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251321351\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251321351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房是人类活动对环境造成不利影响的一个重要因素。减少建筑面积成为推进城市可持续发展的关键战略,因为大房子通常消耗更多的电力和供暖。然而,住宅尺寸和居住满意度之间存在着不可否认的联系,这使得在有限的空间限制下设计既实用又吸引人的住宅变得具有挑战性。缓解空间限制的解决方案包括在住宅综合体内实施共享设施。虽然每个家庭都可以独享自己的单元,但他们也受益于通常在大型住宅中发现的设施。尽管有潜力,共享设施的概念在城市住房文献中受到的关注有限。本研究通过调查计划行为理论(TPB)在这一未被探索的背景下的适用性,为文献做出了贡献,其中涉及到一项带有相当大金融风险的投资。结果表明,我们的扩展TPB模型可以深入了解购房者购买共享设施住宅的意愿。在调查的变量中,态度是最能预测意图的因素,这表明开发商和政策制定者需要共同努力,以提高购房者对这些独特住房解决方案的兴趣。数据显示,购房者倾向于在住宅面积上妥协,以获得被认为对提高宜居性至关重要的设施。然而,总体而言,购房者并没有表现出强烈的购买意愿,对这个概念的态度趋于中性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Come together! Or not? Homebuyers’ interest in sharing facilities with fellow residents
Housing stands as a significant contributor to the adverse environmental impacts stemming from human activities. Reducing floor space emerges as a key strategy for advancing sustainable urban development since larger homes typically consume more electricity and heating. However, there is an undeniable link between dwelling size and residential satisfaction, making it challenging to design homes that are both functional and appealing within limited spatial constraints. A solution to mitigate spatial limitations involves the implementation of shared facilities within residential complexes. While individual households maintain exclusive access to their units, they also benefit from amenities usually found in larger dwellings. Despite its potential, the concept of shared facilities has received limited attention in the urban housing literature. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) in this unexplored context, involving an investment that carries considerable financial risk. Results demonstrate that our extended TPB model provides insights into homebuyers’ intentions to purchase dwellings with shared facilities. Out of the variables examined, attitudes emerge as the strongest predictor of intentions, indicating the need for collaborative efforts between developers and policymakers to bolster homebuyers’ interest in these unique housing solutions. The data reveals a tendency among homebuyers to compromise on dwelling size in favour of accessing amenities deemed essential for enhancing liveability. However, on the whole, homebuyers do not exhibit strong purchasing intentions, and attitudes towards the concept tend to be neutral.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信