远程医疗提供的职业治疗家访服务是否提供了一种不逊色于亲自提供相同服务的选择?一项匹配队列研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Rachel Lommerzheim, Feby Savira, Georgina Lewis, Grace Taylor, Kiran Hari, Shanice Pereira, Toni Heinemann, Lisa Barry, Rebecca Grant, Dave Parsons, Suzanne Robinson, Kristie Harper
{"title":"远程医疗提供的职业治疗家访服务是否提供了一种不逊色于亲自提供相同服务的选择?一项匹配队列研究。","authors":"Rachel Lommerzheim,&nbsp;Feby Savira,&nbsp;Georgina Lewis,&nbsp;Grace Taylor,&nbsp;Kiran Hari,&nbsp;Shanice Pereira,&nbsp;Toni Heinemann,&nbsp;Lisa Barry,&nbsp;Rebecca Grant,&nbsp;Dave Parsons,&nbsp;Suzanne Robinson,&nbsp;Kristie Harper","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Health services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (<i>P</i> = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary:</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does telehealth delivery of an occupational therapy home visiting service provide a non-inferior alternative to in-person delivery of the same service? A matched cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Lommerzheim,&nbsp;Feby Savira,&nbsp;Georgina Lewis,&nbsp;Grace Taylor,&nbsp;Kiran Hari,&nbsp;Shanice Pereira,&nbsp;Toni Heinemann,&nbsp;Lisa Barry,&nbsp;Rebecca Grant,&nbsp;Dave Parsons,&nbsp;Suzanne Robinson,&nbsp;Kristie Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Health services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (<i>P</i> = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:卫生服务部门鼓励采用远程保健,以提高效率和提高病人获得保健的机会。远程医疗职业治疗家访服务的临床效果有待进一步研究。本研究的目的是确定远程医疗提供的职业治疗家访服务是否在保持临床结果的同时减少了总治疗时间。方法:一项回顾性匹配队列研究,研究远程医疗职业治疗家访服务对治疗时间和临床结果的影响,并与标准的面对面治疗进行比较。结果:共纳入544例患者,其中远程医疗服务(病例)216例,现场医疗服务(对照)272例,两者混合服务56例。两组间的总治疗时间差异显著:远程医疗(病例)组的中位治疗时间为40分钟(IQR: 63.8),而现场(对照组)组的中位治疗时间为160分钟(IQR: 90)。然而,远程保健提供服务并不适合所有患者,必须考虑混合护理模式。简单的语言总结:职业治疗师帮助病人离开医院,安全地生活在家里。他们拜访病人的家庭,看他们是否能自己处理。治疗师可能会建议做一些改变,比如增加扶手或洗澡辅助工具,让家更安全。这些访问需要花费大量时间,因此正在测试远程保健,作为减少对面对面服务需求的一种方式。这项研究着眼于远程医疗是否可以节省时间和减少工作量。这项研究发现,远程医疗就诊时间比面对面就诊时间短。研究还发现,在跌倒、谵妄和压伤等事件上,两组之间没有差异。然而,一些患者仍然需要亲自访问,特别是在设备安装或护理人员培训方面。远程医疗是一种有用的工具,但重要的是要知道什么时候仍然需要亲自就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does telehealth delivery of an occupational therapy home visiting service provide a non-inferior alternative to in-person delivery of the same service? A matched cohort study

Introduction

Health services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.

Results

A total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (P < 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (P = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.

Conclusion

Telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered.

Plain Language Summary:

Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信