功能欣赏量表(FAS):荷兰语版本在社区样本和饮食失调女性样本中的心理测量特性和结果。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Marlies Rekkers, Aurélie Nieuwenhuijse, Mia Scheffers, Jooske T van Busschbach, Annemarie A van Elburg
{"title":"功能欣赏量表(FAS):荷兰语版本在社区样本和饮食失调女性样本中的心理测量特性和结果。","authors":"Marlies Rekkers, Aurélie Nieuwenhuijse, Mia Scheffers, Jooske T van Busschbach, Annemarie A van Elburg","doi":"10.1177/13591053251326002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body satisfaction in eating disorders (EDs) is negatively affected by critical evaluation of aesthetic aspects. A focus on the appreciation for the functioning of the body could create a more positive perspective. The Functional Appreciation Scale (FAS) measures functional appreciation. This is the first study that examines the Dutch version of the FAS in a clinical sample. Psychometric properties and differences in scores are evaluated in an ED and a community sample consisting of women. Factor Analysis identified and confirmed a one-dimensional factor structure. Reliability was adequate; convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with the Body Cathexis Scale and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire respectively. Women with EDs scored significantly lower than women from a community sample. Further research regarding the applicability of the FAS for clinical practice is needed because of the ceiling effect and the lack of strong invariance between the clinical and non-clinical group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251326002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The functionality appreciation scale (FAS): Psychometric properties and results of the Dutch version in a community sample and a sample of women with eating disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Marlies Rekkers, Aurélie Nieuwenhuijse, Mia Scheffers, Jooske T van Busschbach, Annemarie A van Elburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591053251326002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Body satisfaction in eating disorders (EDs) is negatively affected by critical evaluation of aesthetic aspects. A focus on the appreciation for the functioning of the body could create a more positive perspective. The Functional Appreciation Scale (FAS) measures functional appreciation. This is the first study that examines the Dutch version of the FAS in a clinical sample. Psychometric properties and differences in scores are evaluated in an ED and a community sample consisting of women. Factor Analysis identified and confirmed a one-dimensional factor structure. Reliability was adequate; convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with the Body Cathexis Scale and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire respectively. Women with EDs scored significantly lower than women from a community sample. Further research regarding the applicability of the FAS for clinical practice is needed because of the ceiling effect and the lack of strong invariance between the clinical and non-clinical group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13591053251326002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251326002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251326002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饮食失调(EDs)的身体满意度受到审美方面的批判性评价的负面影响。专注于欣赏身体的功能可以创造一个更积极的观点。功能增值量表(FAS)衡量功能增值。这是第一个在临床样本中检验荷兰版FAS的研究。在ED和由妇女组成的社区样本中评估心理测量特性和得分差异。因子分析识别并确定了一维的因子结构。可靠性是足够的;通过分别与身体cathexysis量表和饮食失调检查问卷的相关性来支持收敛效度和判别效度。患有急症的女性得分明显低于社区样本中的女性。由于天花板效应和临床组与非临床组之间缺乏强的不变性,需要进一步研究FAS在临床实践中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The functionality appreciation scale (FAS): Psychometric properties and results of the Dutch version in a community sample and a sample of women with eating disorders.

Body satisfaction in eating disorders (EDs) is negatively affected by critical evaluation of aesthetic aspects. A focus on the appreciation for the functioning of the body could create a more positive perspective. The Functional Appreciation Scale (FAS) measures functional appreciation. This is the first study that examines the Dutch version of the FAS in a clinical sample. Psychometric properties and differences in scores are evaluated in an ED and a community sample consisting of women. Factor Analysis identified and confirmed a one-dimensional factor structure. Reliability was adequate; convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with the Body Cathexis Scale and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire respectively. Women with EDs scored significantly lower than women from a community sample. Further research regarding the applicability of the FAS for clinical practice is needed because of the ceiling effect and the lack of strong invariance between the clinical and non-clinical group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信