{"title":"使用计算机断层扫描和弥散加权全身成像对类风湿性关节炎患者的恶性肿瘤筛查进行成像评估,并抑制背景体信号。","authors":"Takeshi Mochizuki, Koichiro Yano, Katsunori Ikari, Naoko Otani, Ryo Hiroshima, Ken Okazaki","doi":"10.1093/mr/roaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate differences in information obtained from plain computed tomography (CT) and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) during malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 524 patients with RA who underwent plain CT from the chest to the pelvis and DWIBS. CT and DWIBS were performed within 3 months of each other. Rheumatologists, radiologists, and pulmonologists interpreted the plain CT and DWIBS images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of malignancy was 3.1%. Prostate, lung, breast, uterine, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancers were detected in 7, 4, 2, 1, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivities of CT and DWIBS were 75.0% and 93.8%, respectively (P = .333). The specificities of CT and DWIBS were 76.0% and 85.8%, respectively (P < .001). The prevalence rates of interstitial lung disease, colonic diverticula, and kidney stones on CT were 17.6%, 27.1%, and 19.1%, respectively. The prevalence of lymphadenopathy in patients who underwent DWIBS was 3.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that DWIBS is superior to or equivalent to CT for malignancy screening. Our findings have important implications for imaging-based screening and can help address cancer-related issues in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"837-842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging assessment of malignancy screening using computed tomography and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression in rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Mochizuki, Koichiro Yano, Katsunori Ikari, Naoko Otani, Ryo Hiroshima, Ken Okazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate differences in information obtained from plain computed tomography (CT) and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) during malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 524 patients with RA who underwent plain CT from the chest to the pelvis and DWIBS. CT and DWIBS were performed within 3 months of each other. Rheumatologists, radiologists, and pulmonologists interpreted the plain CT and DWIBS images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of malignancy was 3.1%. Prostate, lung, breast, uterine, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancers were detected in 7, 4, 2, 1, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivities of CT and DWIBS were 75.0% and 93.8%, respectively (P = .333). The specificities of CT and DWIBS were 76.0% and 85.8%, respectively (P < .001). The prevalence rates of interstitial lung disease, colonic diverticula, and kidney stones on CT were 17.6%, 27.1%, and 19.1%, respectively. The prevalence of lymphadenopathy in patients who underwent DWIBS was 3.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that DWIBS is superior to or equivalent to CT for malignancy screening. Our findings have important implications for imaging-based screening and can help address cancer-related issues in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"837-842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Imaging assessment of malignancy screening using computed tomography and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression in rheumatoid arthritis.
Objectives: To investigate differences in information obtained from plain computed tomography (CT) and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) during malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods: We enrolled 524 patients with RA who underwent plain CT from the chest to the pelvis and DWIBS. CT and DWIBS were performed within 3 months of each other. Rheumatologists, radiologists, and pulmonologists interpreted the plain CT and DWIBS images.
Results: The prevalence of malignancy was 3.1%. Prostate, lung, breast, uterine, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancers were detected in 7, 4, 2, 1, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivities of CT and DWIBS were 75.0% and 93.8%, respectively (P = .333). The specificities of CT and DWIBS were 76.0% and 85.8%, respectively (P < .001). The prevalence rates of interstitial lung disease, colonic diverticula, and kidney stones on CT were 17.6%, 27.1%, and 19.1%, respectively. The prevalence of lymphadenopathy in patients who underwent DWIBS was 3.6%.
Conclusion: This study suggests that DWIBS is superior to or equivalent to CT for malignancy screening. Our findings have important implications for imaging-based screening and can help address cancer-related issues in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
期刊介绍:
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions